Intertidal resource cultivation over millennia structures coastal biodiversity

• Main Author: Cox, Kieran D.
• Other Authors: Juanes, Francis, Dudas, Sarah Elizabeth
• Format: Thesis
• Language: English
• Published: 2021
• Subjects: Shellfish Mariculture; Species-Habitat Relationships; Resource Management; Spatial Subsidies; Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry; Multivariate Random Forest; First Nations
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/1828/13638

Cultivation of marine ecosystems began in the early Holocene and has contributed vital resources to humans over millennia. Several more recent cultivation practices, however, erode biodiversity. Emerging lines of evidence indicate that certain resource management practices may promote favourable ecological conditions. Here, I use the co-occurrence of 24 First Nations clam gardens, shellfish aquaculture farms, and unmodified clam beaches to test several hypotheses concerning the ecological implications of managing intertidal bivalve populations. To so do, in 2015 and 2016, I surveyed epifaunal (surface) and bivalve communities and quantified each intertidal sites’ abiotic conditions, including sediment characteristics and substrate composition. In 2017, I generated three-dimensional models of each site using structure-from-motion photogrammetry and measured several aspects of habitat complexity. Statistical analyses use a combination of non-parametric multivariate statistics, multivariate regression trees, and random forests to quantify the extent to which the intertidal resource cultivation structures nearshore biodiversity Chapter 1 outlines a brief history of humanity's use of marine resources, the transition from extracting to cultivating aquatic taxa, and the emergences of the northeast Pacific’s most prevalent shellfish cultivation practices: clam gardens and shellfish farms. Chapter 2 evaluates the ability of epifaunal community assessment methods to capture species diversity by conducting a paired field experiment using four assessment methods: photo-quadrat, point-intercept, random subsampling, and full-quadrat assessments. Conducting each method concurrently within multiple intertidal sites allowed me to quantify the implications of varying sampling areas, subsampling, and photo surveys on detecting species diversity, abundance, and sample- and coverage-based biodiversity metrics. Species richness, density, and sample-based rarefaction varied between methods, despite assessments occurring at the same ...