Extraction, Indigenous Dispossession and State Power: Lessons from Standing Rock and Wet’suwet’en Resistance
One way settler-colonialism operates in North America is through the extraction of resource wealth, facilitated by the dispossession of Indigenous lands. When Indigenous-led resistance to land- and water-killing projects threatens extraction, settler state and corporate institutions use security mec...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Still Image |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1828/13240 |
id |
ftuvicpubl:oai:dspace.library.uvic.ca:1828/13240 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftuvicpubl:oai:dspace.library.uvic.ca:1828/13240 2023-05-15T16:16:44+02:00 Extraction, Indigenous Dispossession and State Power: Lessons from Standing Rock and Wet’suwet’en Resistance Mittal, Paarth 2021 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1828/13240 en eng http://hdl.handle.net/1828/13240 Wet’suwet’en First Nations Standing Rock Sioux Tribe pipelines dispossession securitization of critical infrastructure (CI) Poster 2021 ftuvicpubl 2022-05-19T06:10:27Z One way settler-colonialism operates in North America is through the extraction of resource wealth, facilitated by the dispossession of Indigenous lands. When Indigenous-led resistance to land- and water-killing projects threatens extraction, settler state and corporate institutions use security mechanisms to eliminate such “threats.” Using as case studies the pipeline conflicts of the Wet’suwet’en Nation’s (especially Unist’ot’en Camp’s) resistance to Coastal GasLink (CGL) in British Columbia (BC), Canada, and the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s resistance to the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL)’ in North Dakota, United States (US), this paper explores how fossil-fuel extraction interacts with critical infrastructure (CI) securitization to further Indigenous land dispossession. Through an in-depth content analysis of passages from TigerSwan surveillance and BC Supreme Court injunction documents, I elicit meaning around how settler states and fossil-fuel corporations rationalize and practice securitization and, consequently, dispossession. First, I introduce some historical context of dispossession and securitization relevant to the Wet’suwet’en and Standing Rock cases. Next, I outline the findings and offer a comparative analysis of the similarities and differences in the security rationales and strategies used. Security actors in both cases shared rationales such as protecting private property, while also exhibiting strategic differences (i.e. social media narrative-shifting in Standing Rock). Jamie Cassels Undergraduate Research Awards (JCURA) Undergraduate Reviewed Still Image First Nations University of Victoria (Canada): UVicDSpace British Columbia ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000) Canada |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of Victoria (Canada): UVicDSpace |
op_collection_id |
ftuvicpubl |
language |
English |
topic |
Wet’suwet’en First Nations Standing Rock Sioux Tribe pipelines dispossession securitization of critical infrastructure (CI) |
spellingShingle |
Wet’suwet’en First Nations Standing Rock Sioux Tribe pipelines dispossession securitization of critical infrastructure (CI) Mittal, Paarth Extraction, Indigenous Dispossession and State Power: Lessons from Standing Rock and Wet’suwet’en Resistance |
topic_facet |
Wet’suwet’en First Nations Standing Rock Sioux Tribe pipelines dispossession securitization of critical infrastructure (CI) |
description |
One way settler-colonialism operates in North America is through the extraction of resource wealth, facilitated by the dispossession of Indigenous lands. When Indigenous-led resistance to land- and water-killing projects threatens extraction, settler state and corporate institutions use security mechanisms to eliminate such “threats.” Using as case studies the pipeline conflicts of the Wet’suwet’en Nation’s (especially Unist’ot’en Camp’s) resistance to Coastal GasLink (CGL) in British Columbia (BC), Canada, and the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s resistance to the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL)’ in North Dakota, United States (US), this paper explores how fossil-fuel extraction interacts with critical infrastructure (CI) securitization to further Indigenous land dispossession. Through an in-depth content analysis of passages from TigerSwan surveillance and BC Supreme Court injunction documents, I elicit meaning around how settler states and fossil-fuel corporations rationalize and practice securitization and, consequently, dispossession. First, I introduce some historical context of dispossession and securitization relevant to the Wet’suwet’en and Standing Rock cases. Next, I outline the findings and offer a comparative analysis of the similarities and differences in the security rationales and strategies used. Security actors in both cases shared rationales such as protecting private property, while also exhibiting strategic differences (i.e. social media narrative-shifting in Standing Rock). Jamie Cassels Undergraduate Research Awards (JCURA) Undergraduate Reviewed |
format |
Still Image |
author |
Mittal, Paarth |
author_facet |
Mittal, Paarth |
author_sort |
Mittal, Paarth |
title |
Extraction, Indigenous Dispossession and State Power: Lessons from Standing Rock and Wet’suwet’en Resistance |
title_short |
Extraction, Indigenous Dispossession and State Power: Lessons from Standing Rock and Wet’suwet’en Resistance |
title_full |
Extraction, Indigenous Dispossession and State Power: Lessons from Standing Rock and Wet’suwet’en Resistance |
title_fullStr |
Extraction, Indigenous Dispossession and State Power: Lessons from Standing Rock and Wet’suwet’en Resistance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Extraction, Indigenous Dispossession and State Power: Lessons from Standing Rock and Wet’suwet’en Resistance |
title_sort |
extraction, indigenous dispossession and state power: lessons from standing rock and wet’suwet’en resistance |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1828/13240 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000) |
geographic |
British Columbia Canada |
geographic_facet |
British Columbia Canada |
genre |
First Nations |
genre_facet |
First Nations |
op_relation |
http://hdl.handle.net/1828/13240 |
_version_ |
1766002592564903936 |