Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism

While international instruments and a few state governments endorse the “free, prior and informed consent” of Indigenous peoples in decision-making about the water in their traditional territories, most state water governance regimes do not recognize Indigenous water rights and responsibilities. App...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water
Main Author: Curran, Deborah
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Water 2019
Subjects:
law
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1828/10673
https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030571
id ftuvicpubl:oai:dspace.library.uvic.ca:1828/10673
record_format openpolar
spelling ftuvicpubl:oai:dspace.library.uvic.ca:1828/10673 2024-01-14T10:06:52+01:00 Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism Curran, Deborah 2019 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1828/10673 https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030571 en eng Water Curran, D.(2019). Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism. Water, 11(3), 571. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030571 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w11030571 http://hdl.handle.net/1828/10673 water governance politics law decision-making processes governmentalities UNDRIP free prior and informed consent FPIC groundwater environmental flows environmental assessment Article 2019 ftuvicpubl https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030571 2023-12-20T00:47:28Z While international instruments and a few state governments endorse the “free, prior and informed consent” of Indigenous peoples in decision-making about the water in their traditional territories, most state water governance regimes do not recognize Indigenous water rights and responsibilities. Applying a political ecology lens to the settler colonialism of water governance exposes the continued depoliticizing personality of natural resources decision-making and reveals water as an abstract, static resource in law and governance processes. Most plainly, these decision-making processes inadequately consider environmental flows or cumulative effects and are at odds with both Indigenous governance and social-ecological approaches to watershed management. Using the example of groundwater licensing in British Columbia, Canada as reinforcing colonialism in water governance, this article examines how First Nations are asserting Indigenous rights in response to natural resource decision-making. Both within and outside of colonial governance processes they are establishing administrative and governance structures that express their water laws and jurisdiction. These structures include the Syilx, Nadleh Wut’en and Stellat’en creating standards for water, the Tsleil-Waututh and Stk’emlúpsemc te Secwépemc community assessments of proposed pipeline and mining facilities, and the First Nations of the Nicola Valley planning process based on their own legal traditions. Where provincial and federal environmental governance has failed, Indigenous communities are repoliticizing colonial decision-making processes to shift jurisdiction towards Indigenous processes that institutionalize responsibilities for and relationships with water. This research was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council grant number 890-2015-0115 and the Real Estate Foundation of British Columbia grant number 2016-11. Faculty Reviewed Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations University of Victoria (Canada): UVicDSpace Canada British Columbia ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000) Water 11 3 571
institution Open Polar
collection University of Victoria (Canada): UVicDSpace
op_collection_id ftuvicpubl
language English
topic water governance
politics
law
decision-making processes
governmentalities
UNDRIP
free
prior and informed consent
FPIC
groundwater
environmental flows
environmental assessment
spellingShingle water governance
politics
law
decision-making processes
governmentalities
UNDRIP
free
prior and informed consent
FPIC
groundwater
environmental flows
environmental assessment
Curran, Deborah
Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism
topic_facet water governance
politics
law
decision-making processes
governmentalities
UNDRIP
free
prior and informed consent
FPIC
groundwater
environmental flows
environmental assessment
description While international instruments and a few state governments endorse the “free, prior and informed consent” of Indigenous peoples in decision-making about the water in their traditional territories, most state water governance regimes do not recognize Indigenous water rights and responsibilities. Applying a political ecology lens to the settler colonialism of water governance exposes the continued depoliticizing personality of natural resources decision-making and reveals water as an abstract, static resource in law and governance processes. Most plainly, these decision-making processes inadequately consider environmental flows or cumulative effects and are at odds with both Indigenous governance and social-ecological approaches to watershed management. Using the example of groundwater licensing in British Columbia, Canada as reinforcing colonialism in water governance, this article examines how First Nations are asserting Indigenous rights in response to natural resource decision-making. Both within and outside of colonial governance processes they are establishing administrative and governance structures that express their water laws and jurisdiction. These structures include the Syilx, Nadleh Wut’en and Stellat’en creating standards for water, the Tsleil-Waututh and Stk’emlúpsemc te Secwépemc community assessments of proposed pipeline and mining facilities, and the First Nations of the Nicola Valley planning process based on their own legal traditions. Where provincial and federal environmental governance has failed, Indigenous communities are repoliticizing colonial decision-making processes to shift jurisdiction towards Indigenous processes that institutionalize responsibilities for and relationships with water. This research was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council grant number 890-2015-0115 and the Real Estate Foundation of British Columbia grant number 2016-11. Faculty Reviewed
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Curran, Deborah
author_facet Curran, Deborah
author_sort Curran, Deborah
title Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism
title_short Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism
title_full Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism
title_fullStr Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism
title_full_unstemmed Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism
title_sort indigenous processes of consent: repoliticizing water governance through legal pluralism
publisher Water
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/1828/10673
https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030571
long_lat ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000)
geographic Canada
British Columbia
geographic_facet Canada
British Columbia
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_relation Curran, D.(2019). Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism. Water, 11(3), 571. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030571
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w11030571
http://hdl.handle.net/1828/10673
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030571
container_title Water
container_volume 11
container_issue 3
container_start_page 571
_version_ 1788061291446796288