Suburban Goose Management: Insights from New York State

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) conducted studies in suburban Rockland County, New York during 1993-2000 to help local officials develop strategies to alleviate conflicts associated with local-nesting or "resident" Canada geese (Branta canadensis). Annual coun...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Swift, Bryan L.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: DigitalCommons@USU 2000
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/wdmconference/2000/session5/14
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1082&context=wdmconference
id ftutahsudc:oai:digitalcommons.usu.edu:wdmconference-1082
record_format openpolar
spelling ftutahsudc:oai:digitalcommons.usu.edu:wdmconference-1082 2023-05-15T15:46:19+02:00 Suburban Goose Management: Insights from New York State Swift, Bryan L. 2000-10-05T07:00:00Z application/pdf https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/wdmconference/2000/session5/14 https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1082&context=wdmconference unknown DigitalCommons@USU https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/wdmconference/2000/session5/14 https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1082&context=wdmconference http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ CC-BY Wildlife Damage Management Conference Life Sciences text 2000 ftutahsudc 2022-03-07T21:49:16Z New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) conducted studies in suburban Rockland County, New York during 1993-2000 to help local officials develop strategies to alleviate conflicts associated with local-nesting or "resident" Canada geese (Branta canadensis). Annual counts indicated a relatively stable population of approximately 2,500-3,000 resident geese in the county, far fewer than anecdotal reports suggested. Counts tended to increase in towns where there was little or no goose management, whereas numbers declined in towns with active goose management efforts (i.e., egg-addling, capture and removal, or use of border collies). Egg-addling programs did not result in immediate reduction of goose numbers, but provided some relief at nesting sites and may have limited population growth. Removal of geese reduced total goose numbers but did not provide year-round relief at all capture locations. Use of border collies alleviated problems at many locations, but most displaced birds remained nearby. Costs of management alternatives varied widely, but all techniques were useful in a comprehensive management program. There is no quick or easy solution to goose problems in suburban areas; a coordinated community effort delivered by municipal "goose control officers" is recommended. Text Branta canadensis Utah State University: DigitalCommons@USU Canada
institution Open Polar
collection Utah State University: DigitalCommons@USU
op_collection_id ftutahsudc
language unknown
topic Life Sciences
spellingShingle Life Sciences
Swift, Bryan L.
Suburban Goose Management: Insights from New York State
topic_facet Life Sciences
description New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) conducted studies in suburban Rockland County, New York during 1993-2000 to help local officials develop strategies to alleviate conflicts associated with local-nesting or "resident" Canada geese (Branta canadensis). Annual counts indicated a relatively stable population of approximately 2,500-3,000 resident geese in the county, far fewer than anecdotal reports suggested. Counts tended to increase in towns where there was little or no goose management, whereas numbers declined in towns with active goose management efforts (i.e., egg-addling, capture and removal, or use of border collies). Egg-addling programs did not result in immediate reduction of goose numbers, but provided some relief at nesting sites and may have limited population growth. Removal of geese reduced total goose numbers but did not provide year-round relief at all capture locations. Use of border collies alleviated problems at many locations, but most displaced birds remained nearby. Costs of management alternatives varied widely, but all techniques were useful in a comprehensive management program. There is no quick or easy solution to goose problems in suburban areas; a coordinated community effort delivered by municipal "goose control officers" is recommended.
format Text
author Swift, Bryan L.
author_facet Swift, Bryan L.
author_sort Swift, Bryan L.
title Suburban Goose Management: Insights from New York State
title_short Suburban Goose Management: Insights from New York State
title_full Suburban Goose Management: Insights from New York State
title_fullStr Suburban Goose Management: Insights from New York State
title_full_unstemmed Suburban Goose Management: Insights from New York State
title_sort suburban goose management: insights from new york state
publisher DigitalCommons@USU
publishDate 2000
url https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/wdmconference/2000/session5/14
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1082&context=wdmconference
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Branta canadensis
genre_facet Branta canadensis
op_source Wildlife Damage Management Conference
op_relation https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/wdmconference/2000/session5/14
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1082&context=wdmconference
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
_version_ 1766381011945390080