Controls on Arctic River Temperatures: A Delicate Balance

Climate change effects are strongly manifested in the Arctic. Understanding the mechanisms that link climate to river temperature is critical for predicting the impact that climate change will have on aquatic species distribution, carbon cycling, and climate change feedback mechanisms as river tempe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: King, Tyler, Neilson, Bethany
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: DigitalCommons@USU 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/researchweek/ResearchWeek2015/All2015/130
id ftutahsudc:oai:digitalcommons.usu.edu:researchweek-1129
record_format openpolar
spelling ftutahsudc:oai:digitalcommons.usu.edu:researchweek-1129 2023-05-15T14:51:07+02:00 Controls on Arctic River Temperatures: A Delicate Balance King, Tyler Neilson, Bethany 2015-04-09T16:00:00Z https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/researchweek/ResearchWeek2015/All2015/130 unknown DigitalCommons@USU https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/researchweek/ResearchWeek2015/All2015/130 Student Research Symposium text 2015 ftutahsudc 2022-03-07T20:38:08Z Climate change effects are strongly manifested in the Arctic. Understanding the mechanisms that link climate to river temperature is critical for predicting the impact that climate change will have on aquatic species distribution, carbon cycling, and climate change feedback mechanisms as river temperature exerts direct control over biological, physical, and chemical processes in the aquatic environment. We present the results from a basic dynamic stream temperature model for the Kuparuk River in Arctic Alaska. This model is used to determine and quantify mechanisms that control river temperature and to identify additional mechanisms necessary to capture Arctic river temperature regimes. This basic model accounts for heat exchange between the river and the atmosphere, river bed, and landscape through lateral inflows (combined surface and subsurface flow). The watershed was divided into headwater (lower order) and coastal (higher order) sections to determine spatial variability in dominant mechanisms. Due to the complexity of lateral inflows and minimal information on the spatial and temporal variability of volumes and temperatures, different simplified treatments were tested within the model. Based on two years of data and subsequent modeling, this basic model reproduced the thermal behavior in the coastal portion of the study reach, but not in the headwater regions. It is expected that due to smaller volumes of water in the lower order portions of the watershed, it is necessary to have more detailed information on channel morphology to capture the variability of surface areas with the highly transient flow regime. Further, additional heat transfer mechanisms such as surface and hyporheic transient storage may be necessary to capture temperature responses during low flow periods. Text Arctic Climate change Alaska Utah State University: DigitalCommons@USU Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Utah State University: DigitalCommons@USU
op_collection_id ftutahsudc
language unknown
description Climate change effects are strongly manifested in the Arctic. Understanding the mechanisms that link climate to river temperature is critical for predicting the impact that climate change will have on aquatic species distribution, carbon cycling, and climate change feedback mechanisms as river temperature exerts direct control over biological, physical, and chemical processes in the aquatic environment. We present the results from a basic dynamic stream temperature model for the Kuparuk River in Arctic Alaska. This model is used to determine and quantify mechanisms that control river temperature and to identify additional mechanisms necessary to capture Arctic river temperature regimes. This basic model accounts for heat exchange between the river and the atmosphere, river bed, and landscape through lateral inflows (combined surface and subsurface flow). The watershed was divided into headwater (lower order) and coastal (higher order) sections to determine spatial variability in dominant mechanisms. Due to the complexity of lateral inflows and minimal information on the spatial and temporal variability of volumes and temperatures, different simplified treatments were tested within the model. Based on two years of data and subsequent modeling, this basic model reproduced the thermal behavior in the coastal portion of the study reach, but not in the headwater regions. It is expected that due to smaller volumes of water in the lower order portions of the watershed, it is necessary to have more detailed information on channel morphology to capture the variability of surface areas with the highly transient flow regime. Further, additional heat transfer mechanisms such as surface and hyporheic transient storage may be necessary to capture temperature responses during low flow periods.
format Text
author King, Tyler
Neilson, Bethany
spellingShingle King, Tyler
Neilson, Bethany
Controls on Arctic River Temperatures: A Delicate Balance
author_facet King, Tyler
Neilson, Bethany
author_sort King, Tyler
title Controls on Arctic River Temperatures: A Delicate Balance
title_short Controls on Arctic River Temperatures: A Delicate Balance
title_full Controls on Arctic River Temperatures: A Delicate Balance
title_fullStr Controls on Arctic River Temperatures: A Delicate Balance
title_full_unstemmed Controls on Arctic River Temperatures: A Delicate Balance
title_sort controls on arctic river temperatures: a delicate balance
publisher DigitalCommons@USU
publishDate 2015
url https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/researchweek/ResearchWeek2015/All2015/130
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Climate change
Alaska
genre_facet Arctic
Climate change
Alaska
op_source Student Research Symposium
op_relation https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/researchweek/ResearchWeek2015/All2015/130
_version_ 1766322182959398912