Effectiveness of a Simulated Pack to Manipulate Wolf Movements

Bioboundaries, also called biofences, are deterrents that attempt to exploit certain innate behaviors to exclude wildlife from target areas. We hypothesized that human-deployed scent marks and playbacks of foreign howls could simulate a territorial gray wolf (Canis lupus) pack impinging on a residen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anhalt, Christine M., Van Deelen, Timothy R., Schultz, Ronald N., Wydeven, Adrian P.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: DigitalCommons@USU 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol8/iss2/6
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1051&context=hwi
id ftutahsudc:oai:digitalcommons.usu.edu:hwi-1051
record_format openpolar
spelling ftutahsudc:oai:digitalcommons.usu.edu:hwi-1051 2023-05-15T15:49:36+02:00 Effectiveness of a Simulated Pack to Manipulate Wolf Movements Anhalt, Christine M. Van Deelen, Timothy R. Schultz, Ronald N. Wydeven, Adrian P. 2014-01-01T08:00:00Z application/pdf https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol8/iss2/6 https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1051&context=hwi unknown DigitalCommons@USU https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol8/iss2/6 https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1051&context=hwi Human–Wildlife Interactions bioboundary biofence Canis lupus deterrent human–wildlife conflicts nonlethal rendezvous site territoriality Life Sciences text 2014 ftutahsudc 2022-03-07T21:36:17Z Bioboundaries, also called biofences, are deterrents that attempt to exploit certain innate behaviors to exclude wildlife from target areas. We hypothesized that human-deployed scent marks and playbacks of foreign howls could simulate a territorial gray wolf (Canis lupus) pack impinging on a resident pack, thereby causing the resident pack to move. During summer 2010, we deployed a simulated-pack bioboundary near 3 wolf packs in northern Wisconsin and monitored their movements relative to 3 wolf packs experiencing a sham treatment, to control for effects of human presence. We analyzed wolves’ locations (≥1 location per week) and used linear models with mixed effects to examine distance from the rendezvous site as a function of treatment (sham or experimental) and phase of treatment (before or after treatment was initiated), while accounting for variations in individual wolves. We found little evidence that biofences, as configured and deployed in this study, caused wolves to change use of their territory. Text Canis lupus gray wolf Utah State University: DigitalCommons@USU
institution Open Polar
collection Utah State University: DigitalCommons@USU
op_collection_id ftutahsudc
language unknown
topic bioboundary
biofence
Canis lupus
deterrent
human–wildlife conflicts
nonlethal
rendezvous site
territoriality
Life Sciences
spellingShingle bioboundary
biofence
Canis lupus
deterrent
human–wildlife conflicts
nonlethal
rendezvous site
territoriality
Life Sciences
Anhalt, Christine M.
Van Deelen, Timothy R.
Schultz, Ronald N.
Wydeven, Adrian P.
Effectiveness of a Simulated Pack to Manipulate Wolf Movements
topic_facet bioboundary
biofence
Canis lupus
deterrent
human–wildlife conflicts
nonlethal
rendezvous site
territoriality
Life Sciences
description Bioboundaries, also called biofences, are deterrents that attempt to exploit certain innate behaviors to exclude wildlife from target areas. We hypothesized that human-deployed scent marks and playbacks of foreign howls could simulate a territorial gray wolf (Canis lupus) pack impinging on a resident pack, thereby causing the resident pack to move. During summer 2010, we deployed a simulated-pack bioboundary near 3 wolf packs in northern Wisconsin and monitored their movements relative to 3 wolf packs experiencing a sham treatment, to control for effects of human presence. We analyzed wolves’ locations (≥1 location per week) and used linear models with mixed effects to examine distance from the rendezvous site as a function of treatment (sham or experimental) and phase of treatment (before or after treatment was initiated), while accounting for variations in individual wolves. We found little evidence that biofences, as configured and deployed in this study, caused wolves to change use of their territory.
format Text
author Anhalt, Christine M.
Van Deelen, Timothy R.
Schultz, Ronald N.
Wydeven, Adrian P.
author_facet Anhalt, Christine M.
Van Deelen, Timothy R.
Schultz, Ronald N.
Wydeven, Adrian P.
author_sort Anhalt, Christine M.
title Effectiveness of a Simulated Pack to Manipulate Wolf Movements
title_short Effectiveness of a Simulated Pack to Manipulate Wolf Movements
title_full Effectiveness of a Simulated Pack to Manipulate Wolf Movements
title_fullStr Effectiveness of a Simulated Pack to Manipulate Wolf Movements
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of a Simulated Pack to Manipulate Wolf Movements
title_sort effectiveness of a simulated pack to manipulate wolf movements
publisher DigitalCommons@USU
publishDate 2014
url https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol8/iss2/6
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1051&context=hwi
genre Canis lupus
gray wolf
genre_facet Canis lupus
gray wolf
op_source Human–Wildlife Interactions
op_relation https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol8/iss2/6
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1051&context=hwi
_version_ 1766384626482282496