Evaluation of foliar sprays to reduce crop damage by Canada geese

South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks annually spends >$500,000 managing crop damage caused by grazing Canada geese (Branta canadensis). Foliar applications of a chemical feeding deterrent could provide an effective alternative to the methods currently being used to reduce damage. In 20...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dieter, Charles D., Warner, Cody S., Ren, Curiong
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: DigitalCommons@USU 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol8/iss1/15
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1024&context=hwi
id ftutahsudc:oai:digitalcommons.usu.edu:hwi-1024
record_format openpolar
spelling ftutahsudc:oai:digitalcommons.usu.edu:hwi-1024 2023-05-15T15:46:21+02:00 Evaluation of foliar sprays to reduce crop damage by Canada geese Dieter, Charles D. Warner, Cody S. Ren, Curiong 2014-01-01T08:00:00Z application/pdf https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol8/iss1/15 https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1024&context=hwi unknown DigitalCommons@USU https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol8/iss1/15 https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1024&context=hwi Human–Wildlife Interactions anthraquinone Canada geese crop damage human–wildlife conflicts methyl anthranilate soybeans Animal Sciences text 2014 ftutahsudc 2022-03-07T21:36:10Z South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks annually spends >$500,000 managing crop damage caused by grazing Canada geese (Branta canadensis). Foliar applications of a chemical feeding deterrent could provide an effective alternative to the methods currently being used to reduce damage. In 2011 and 2012, we evaluated Rejex-It Migrate Turfguard®, Bird Shield®, Avian Control®, and Avipel® as grazing deterrents. We used a ground sprayer to apply the treatments every 7 days to plots in soybean fields in Day County, South Dakota. We monitored activity in the plots using time-lapse photography. We began treating the plots after geese had begun using them (late June through mid- July). Damage was estimated after geese had abandoned the plots (August). The methyl anthranilate products (Rejex-It, Bird Shield, and Avian Control) were ineffective at reducing crop damage. Damage was 100% on all plots treated with these products. Use of plots significantly increased (P < 0.02) between the pretreatment and postreatment periods for Rejex-It (180 minutes/day and 313 minutes/day) and Bird Shield (200 minutes/day and 299 minutes/day); whereas, use was similar (P = 0.99) between plots treated with Avian Control (111 minutes/day) and reference plots (104 minutes/day). Less time was spent on plots treated with the anthraquinone-based product, Avipel (44 minutes/day) than on reference plots (132 minutes/day; P < 0.01). Additionally, soybean damage was less on Avipel-treated plots than on reference plots (P < 0.01). We recommend more research on Avipel to assess rates and timing of application to make this product efficacious and economical in the field. Text Branta canadensis Utah State University: DigitalCommons@USU Canada
institution Open Polar
collection Utah State University: DigitalCommons@USU
op_collection_id ftutahsudc
language unknown
topic anthraquinone
Canada geese
crop damage
human–wildlife conflicts
methyl anthranilate
soybeans
Animal Sciences
spellingShingle anthraquinone
Canada geese
crop damage
human–wildlife conflicts
methyl anthranilate
soybeans
Animal Sciences
Dieter, Charles D.
Warner, Cody S.
Ren, Curiong
Evaluation of foliar sprays to reduce crop damage by Canada geese
topic_facet anthraquinone
Canada geese
crop damage
human–wildlife conflicts
methyl anthranilate
soybeans
Animal Sciences
description South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks annually spends >$500,000 managing crop damage caused by grazing Canada geese (Branta canadensis). Foliar applications of a chemical feeding deterrent could provide an effective alternative to the methods currently being used to reduce damage. In 2011 and 2012, we evaluated Rejex-It Migrate Turfguard®, Bird Shield®, Avian Control®, and Avipel® as grazing deterrents. We used a ground sprayer to apply the treatments every 7 days to plots in soybean fields in Day County, South Dakota. We monitored activity in the plots using time-lapse photography. We began treating the plots after geese had begun using them (late June through mid- July). Damage was estimated after geese had abandoned the plots (August). The methyl anthranilate products (Rejex-It, Bird Shield, and Avian Control) were ineffective at reducing crop damage. Damage was 100% on all plots treated with these products. Use of plots significantly increased (P < 0.02) between the pretreatment and postreatment periods for Rejex-It (180 minutes/day and 313 minutes/day) and Bird Shield (200 minutes/day and 299 minutes/day); whereas, use was similar (P = 0.99) between plots treated with Avian Control (111 minutes/day) and reference plots (104 minutes/day). Less time was spent on plots treated with the anthraquinone-based product, Avipel (44 minutes/day) than on reference plots (132 minutes/day; P < 0.01). Additionally, soybean damage was less on Avipel-treated plots than on reference plots (P < 0.01). We recommend more research on Avipel to assess rates and timing of application to make this product efficacious and economical in the field.
format Text
author Dieter, Charles D.
Warner, Cody S.
Ren, Curiong
author_facet Dieter, Charles D.
Warner, Cody S.
Ren, Curiong
author_sort Dieter, Charles D.
title Evaluation of foliar sprays to reduce crop damage by Canada geese
title_short Evaluation of foliar sprays to reduce crop damage by Canada geese
title_full Evaluation of foliar sprays to reduce crop damage by Canada geese
title_fullStr Evaluation of foliar sprays to reduce crop damage by Canada geese
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of foliar sprays to reduce crop damage by Canada geese
title_sort evaluation of foliar sprays to reduce crop damage by canada geese
publisher DigitalCommons@USU
publishDate 2014
url https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol8/iss1/15
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1024&context=hwi
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Branta canadensis
genre_facet Branta canadensis
op_source Human–Wildlife Interactions
op_relation https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol8/iss1/15
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1024&context=hwi
_version_ 1766381041519427584