Evaluating the Efficacy of Livestock Guardian Dogs

Large carnivores are unique in their ability to elicit strong human emotions and reactions, making their management extremely contentious. Lethal control is still a common management technique where livestock and carnivores overlap despite a social preference for non-lethal techniques. The use of li...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kinka, Daniel
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Hosted by Utah State University Libraries 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/grs/57
id ftutahsudc:oai:digitalcommons.usu.edu:grs-1296
record_format openpolar
spelling ftutahsudc:oai:digitalcommons.usu.edu:grs-1296 2023-05-15T15:51:07+02:00 Evaluating the Efficacy of Livestock Guardian Dogs Kinka, Daniel 2014-04-10T07:00:00Z https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/grs/57 unknown Hosted by Utah State University Libraries https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/grs/57 Graduate Research Symposium text 2014 ftutahsudc 2022-03-07T20:40:46Z Large carnivores are unique in their ability to elicit strong human emotions and reactions, making their management extremely contentious. Lethal control is still a common management technique where livestock and carnivores overlap despite a social preference for non-lethal techniques. The use of livestock guardian dogs (LGDs) as a non-lethal tool for reducing livestock depredations is becoming common in the United States. LGDs may provide a viable alternative to lethal management of carnivores in the U.S., but currently utilized breeds appear ineffective against large carnivores. There is little research to determine if different LGD breeds can curb livestock depredations by large carnivores. This study evaluates the effectiveness of LGD breeds in the Western U.S. to determine best management practices for LGDs where wolves (Canis lupus) and grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) are present. LGD breeds common in the U.S. are compared with three European breeds believed to be more effective at deterring large carnivores. In a pilot study, three Turkish-breed LGDs (Kangals) were placed with a sheep producer in Northwestern Montana, and contrasted with three common-breed LGDs at a neighboring ranch. In both operations the LGDs were left unattended for long periods of time with flocks of about 800 sheep in large (1-10 km2), fenced pastures. GPS data collected for LGDs indicate that all LGDs stayed close by their flocks during the grazing season (median distance to pasture = 0 meters). Remote cameras detected grizzly bears in and around sheep pastures while sheep were nearby. Neither operation lost sheep to grizzly bears during the pilot study. However, grizzly bear density was higher near the kangal's flock and reports from ranchers suggest there were numerous LGD-bear encounters there. The lack of grizzly bear depredations makes direct breed comparisons difficult at this time, but evidence suggests that kangals are effective at deterring grizzly bears. Text Canis lupus Ursus arctos Utah State University: DigitalCommons@USU
institution Open Polar
collection Utah State University: DigitalCommons@USU
op_collection_id ftutahsudc
language unknown
description Large carnivores are unique in their ability to elicit strong human emotions and reactions, making their management extremely contentious. Lethal control is still a common management technique where livestock and carnivores overlap despite a social preference for non-lethal techniques. The use of livestock guardian dogs (LGDs) as a non-lethal tool for reducing livestock depredations is becoming common in the United States. LGDs may provide a viable alternative to lethal management of carnivores in the U.S., but currently utilized breeds appear ineffective against large carnivores. There is little research to determine if different LGD breeds can curb livestock depredations by large carnivores. This study evaluates the effectiveness of LGD breeds in the Western U.S. to determine best management practices for LGDs where wolves (Canis lupus) and grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) are present. LGD breeds common in the U.S. are compared with three European breeds believed to be more effective at deterring large carnivores. In a pilot study, three Turkish-breed LGDs (Kangals) were placed with a sheep producer in Northwestern Montana, and contrasted with three common-breed LGDs at a neighboring ranch. In both operations the LGDs were left unattended for long periods of time with flocks of about 800 sheep in large (1-10 km2), fenced pastures. GPS data collected for LGDs indicate that all LGDs stayed close by their flocks during the grazing season (median distance to pasture = 0 meters). Remote cameras detected grizzly bears in and around sheep pastures while sheep were nearby. Neither operation lost sheep to grizzly bears during the pilot study. However, grizzly bear density was higher near the kangal's flock and reports from ranchers suggest there were numerous LGD-bear encounters there. The lack of grizzly bear depredations makes direct breed comparisons difficult at this time, but evidence suggests that kangals are effective at deterring grizzly bears.
format Text
author Kinka, Daniel
spellingShingle Kinka, Daniel
Evaluating the Efficacy of Livestock Guardian Dogs
author_facet Kinka, Daniel
author_sort Kinka, Daniel
title Evaluating the Efficacy of Livestock Guardian Dogs
title_short Evaluating the Efficacy of Livestock Guardian Dogs
title_full Evaluating the Efficacy of Livestock Guardian Dogs
title_fullStr Evaluating the Efficacy of Livestock Guardian Dogs
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Efficacy of Livestock Guardian Dogs
title_sort evaluating the efficacy of livestock guardian dogs
publisher Hosted by Utah State University Libraries
publishDate 2014
url https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/grs/57
genre Canis lupus
Ursus arctos
genre_facet Canis lupus
Ursus arctos
op_source Graduate Research Symposium
op_relation https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/grs/57
_version_ 1766386180309385216