Seven considerations about dingoes as biodiversity engineers: the socioecological niches of dogs in Australia
Australian dingoes have recently been suggested as a tool to aid biodiversity conservation through the reversal or prevention of trophic cascades and mesopredator release. However, at least seven ecological and sociological considerations must be addressed before dog populations are positively manag...
Published in: | Australian Mammalogy |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
CSIRO Publishing
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q3847/seven-considerations-about-dingoes-as-biodiversity-engineers-the-socioecological-niches-of-dogs-in-australia https://doi.org/10.1071/AM11012 |
id |
ftusqland:oai:research.usq.edu.au:q3847 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftusqland:oai:research.usq.edu.au:q3847 2023-10-09T21:50:37+02:00 Seven considerations about dingoes as biodiversity engineers: the socioecological niches of dogs in Australia Fleming, Peter J. S. Allen, Benjamin L. Ballard, Guy-Anthony 2012 https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q3847/seven-considerations-about-dingoes-as-biodiversity-engineers-the-socioecological-niches-of-dogs-in-australia https://doi.org/10.1071/AM11012 unknown CSIRO Publishing https://doi.org/10.1071/AM11012 Fleming, Peter J. S., Allen, Benjamin L. and Ballard, Guy-Anthony. 2012. "Seven considerations about dingoes as biodiversity engineers: the socioecological niches of dogs in Australia." Australian Mammalogy. 34 (1), pp. 119-123. https://doi.org/10.1071/AM11012 apex predators Canis lupus dingo free-ranging dogs human values mesopredator release hypothesis reintroduction threatened species trophic cascade article PeerReviewed 2012 ftusqland https://doi.org/10.1071/AM11012 2023-09-18T22:38:20Z Australian dingoes have recently been suggested as a tool to aid biodiversity conservation through the reversal or prevention of trophic cascades and mesopredator release. However, at least seven ecological and sociological considerations must be addressed before dog populations are positively managed. 1. Domestication and feralisation of dingoes have resulted in behavioural changes that continue to expose a broad range of native and introduced fauna to predation. 2. Dingoes and other dogs are classic mesopredators, while humans are the apex predator and primary ecosystem engineers in Australia. 3. Anthropogenic landscape changes could prevent modern dingoes from fulfilling their pre-European roles. 4. Dingoes are known to exploit many of the same species they are often presumed to ‘protect’, predisposing them to presentdirect risks to many threatened species. 5. The assertion that contemporary dog control facilitates the release of mesopredators disregards the realities of effective dog control, which simultaneously reduces fox and dog abundance and is unlikely to enable increases in fox abundance. 6. The processes affecting threatened fauna are likely a combination of both top-down and bottom-up effects, which will not be solved or reversed by concentrating efforts on managing only predator effects. 7. Most importantly, human social and economic niches are highly variable across the ecosystems where dingoes are present or proposed. Human perceptions will ultimately determine acceptance of positive dingo management. Outside of an adaptive management framework, positively managing dingoes while ignoring these seven considerations is unlikely to succeed in conserving native faunal biodiversity but is likely to have negative effects on ecological, social and economic values. Article in Journal/Newspaper Canis lupus University of Southern Queensland: USQ ePrints Australian Mammalogy 34 1 119 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of Southern Queensland: USQ ePrints |
op_collection_id |
ftusqland |
language |
unknown |
topic |
apex predators Canis lupus dingo free-ranging dogs human values mesopredator release hypothesis reintroduction threatened species trophic cascade |
spellingShingle |
apex predators Canis lupus dingo free-ranging dogs human values mesopredator release hypothesis reintroduction threatened species trophic cascade Fleming, Peter J. S. Allen, Benjamin L. Ballard, Guy-Anthony Seven considerations about dingoes as biodiversity engineers: the socioecological niches of dogs in Australia |
topic_facet |
apex predators Canis lupus dingo free-ranging dogs human values mesopredator release hypothesis reintroduction threatened species trophic cascade |
description |
Australian dingoes have recently been suggested as a tool to aid biodiversity conservation through the reversal or prevention of trophic cascades and mesopredator release. However, at least seven ecological and sociological considerations must be addressed before dog populations are positively managed. 1. Domestication and feralisation of dingoes have resulted in behavioural changes that continue to expose a broad range of native and introduced fauna to predation. 2. Dingoes and other dogs are classic mesopredators, while humans are the apex predator and primary ecosystem engineers in Australia. 3. Anthropogenic landscape changes could prevent modern dingoes from fulfilling their pre-European roles. 4. Dingoes are known to exploit many of the same species they are often presumed to ‘protect’, predisposing them to presentdirect risks to many threatened species. 5. The assertion that contemporary dog control facilitates the release of mesopredators disregards the realities of effective dog control, which simultaneously reduces fox and dog abundance and is unlikely to enable increases in fox abundance. 6. The processes affecting threatened fauna are likely a combination of both top-down and bottom-up effects, which will not be solved or reversed by concentrating efforts on managing only predator effects. 7. Most importantly, human social and economic niches are highly variable across the ecosystems where dingoes are present or proposed. Human perceptions will ultimately determine acceptance of positive dingo management. Outside of an adaptive management framework, positively managing dingoes while ignoring these seven considerations is unlikely to succeed in conserving native faunal biodiversity but is likely to have negative effects on ecological, social and economic values. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Fleming, Peter J. S. Allen, Benjamin L. Ballard, Guy-Anthony |
author_facet |
Fleming, Peter J. S. Allen, Benjamin L. Ballard, Guy-Anthony |
author_sort |
Fleming, Peter J. S. |
title |
Seven considerations about dingoes as biodiversity engineers: the socioecological niches of dogs in Australia |
title_short |
Seven considerations about dingoes as biodiversity engineers: the socioecological niches of dogs in Australia |
title_full |
Seven considerations about dingoes as biodiversity engineers: the socioecological niches of dogs in Australia |
title_fullStr |
Seven considerations about dingoes as biodiversity engineers: the socioecological niches of dogs in Australia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Seven considerations about dingoes as biodiversity engineers: the socioecological niches of dogs in Australia |
title_sort |
seven considerations about dingoes as biodiversity engineers: the socioecological niches of dogs in australia |
publisher |
CSIRO Publishing |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q3847/seven-considerations-about-dingoes-as-biodiversity-engineers-the-socioecological-niches-of-dogs-in-australia https://doi.org/10.1071/AM11012 |
genre |
Canis lupus |
genre_facet |
Canis lupus |
op_relation |
https://doi.org/10.1071/AM11012 Fleming, Peter J. S., Allen, Benjamin L. and Ballard, Guy-Anthony. 2012. "Seven considerations about dingoes as biodiversity engineers: the socioecological niches of dogs in Australia." Australian Mammalogy. 34 (1), pp. 119-123. https://doi.org/10.1071/AM11012 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1071/AM11012 |
container_title |
Australian Mammalogy |
container_volume |
34 |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
119 |
_version_ |
1779313689151668224 |