Assessing the Utility of Three Calibration Methods for Digital Elevation Models (DEMs)

Permafrost degradation in the Arctic is negatively effecting the environment, structures, and livelihoods of residents in Arctic areas. Melting of permafrost from increased global temperatures causes inconsistent land subsidence and compromises infrastructure, including buildings, roads, and energy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Miller, Diana, Dixon, Timothy H.
Format: Conference Object
Language:unknown
Published: Digital Commons @ University of South Florida 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/geo_facpub/2204
https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm19/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/620897
id ftusouthflorida:oai:digitalcommons.usf.edu:geo_facpub-3192
record_format openpolar
spelling ftusouthflorida:oai:digitalcommons.usf.edu:geo_facpub-3192 2023-07-30T04:01:16+02:00 Assessing the Utility of Three Calibration Methods for Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) Miller, Diana Dixon, Timothy H. 2019-12-09T08:00:00Z https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/geo_facpub/2204 https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm19/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/620897 unknown Digital Commons @ University of South Florida https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/geo_facpub/2204 https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm19/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/620897 School of Geosciences Faculty and Staff Publications Earth Sciences presentation 2019 ftusouthflorida 2023-07-13T20:47:09Z Permafrost degradation in the Arctic is negatively effecting the environment, structures, and livelihoods of residents in Arctic areas. Melting of permafrost from increased global temperatures causes inconsistent land subsidence and compromises infrastructure, including buildings, roads, and energy pipelines. ArcticDEM data, created by the Polar Geospatial Center from DigitalGlobe, Inc. imagery, is being used to study permafrost degradation, including long-term change, in the North Slope Borough, Alaska. To utilize Arctic DEM for this purpose, it must be calibrated. This study examines the utility of three methods of calibration of ArcticDEM data from each year of 2010, 2011, 2012, 2015, 2016, and 2017. The first method is to calibrate the data using internal referencing, assuming the majority of the area has not changed in elevation and adjusting subsequent years to the first data strip collected in 2010. The second method identifies rock outcrops within the study area and assumes that these outcrops do not change in elevation. The DEMs are all adjusted so the rock outcrops are consistently the same elevation throughout the time series. The third method utilizes an extraneous data source, e.g. LiDAR data from the 2010 USGS North Slope of Alaska LiDAR project, obtained through the NOAA Data Access Viewer. The LiDAR data is compared with the ArcticDEM data strips, and the ArcticDEM are shifted to match the elevation of the LiDAR data. The results of all three calibration methods are compared for precision and accuracy. Conference Object Arctic north slope permafrost Alaska University of South Florida St. Petersburg: Digital USFSP Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection University of South Florida St. Petersburg: Digital USFSP
op_collection_id ftusouthflorida
language unknown
topic Earth Sciences
spellingShingle Earth Sciences
Miller, Diana
Dixon, Timothy H.
Assessing the Utility of Three Calibration Methods for Digital Elevation Models (DEMs)
topic_facet Earth Sciences
description Permafrost degradation in the Arctic is negatively effecting the environment, structures, and livelihoods of residents in Arctic areas. Melting of permafrost from increased global temperatures causes inconsistent land subsidence and compromises infrastructure, including buildings, roads, and energy pipelines. ArcticDEM data, created by the Polar Geospatial Center from DigitalGlobe, Inc. imagery, is being used to study permafrost degradation, including long-term change, in the North Slope Borough, Alaska. To utilize Arctic DEM for this purpose, it must be calibrated. This study examines the utility of three methods of calibration of ArcticDEM data from each year of 2010, 2011, 2012, 2015, 2016, and 2017. The first method is to calibrate the data using internal referencing, assuming the majority of the area has not changed in elevation and adjusting subsequent years to the first data strip collected in 2010. The second method identifies rock outcrops within the study area and assumes that these outcrops do not change in elevation. The DEMs are all adjusted so the rock outcrops are consistently the same elevation throughout the time series. The third method utilizes an extraneous data source, e.g. LiDAR data from the 2010 USGS North Slope of Alaska LiDAR project, obtained through the NOAA Data Access Viewer. The LiDAR data is compared with the ArcticDEM data strips, and the ArcticDEM are shifted to match the elevation of the LiDAR data. The results of all three calibration methods are compared for precision and accuracy.
format Conference Object
author Miller, Diana
Dixon, Timothy H.
author_facet Miller, Diana
Dixon, Timothy H.
author_sort Miller, Diana
title Assessing the Utility of Three Calibration Methods for Digital Elevation Models (DEMs)
title_short Assessing the Utility of Three Calibration Methods for Digital Elevation Models (DEMs)
title_full Assessing the Utility of Three Calibration Methods for Digital Elevation Models (DEMs)
title_fullStr Assessing the Utility of Three Calibration Methods for Digital Elevation Models (DEMs)
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Utility of Three Calibration Methods for Digital Elevation Models (DEMs)
title_sort assessing the utility of three calibration methods for digital elevation models (dems)
publisher Digital Commons @ University of South Florida
publishDate 2019
url https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/geo_facpub/2204
https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm19/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/620897
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
north slope
permafrost
Alaska
genre_facet Arctic
north slope
permafrost
Alaska
op_source School of Geosciences Faculty and Staff Publications
op_relation https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/geo_facpub/2204
https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm19/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/620897
_version_ 1772812013566689280