Kihci-Asotamâtowin (The Treaty Sovereigns' Sacred Agreements) and The Crown's Constitutional Obligations to Holders of Treaty Rights through Consultation and Restoration of Treaty Constitutionalism.

ABSTRACT The purpose of this thesis is to assess the Crown’s Constitutional duty of consultation and its application on the holders of Treaty rights. Indigenous legal and Constitutional orders are the underpinning of the consensual Treaties. They were negotiated by sovereign nations through mutual c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bitternose, Leah
Other Authors: Henderson, James Sakej Y., Zlotkin, Norman, Newman, Dwight, Von Tigerstrom, Barbara, Coyle, Michael
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Saskatchewan 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10388/ETD-2014-04-1536
id ftusaskatchewan:oai:harvest.usask.ca:10388/ETD-2014-04-1536
record_format openpolar
spelling ftusaskatchewan:oai:harvest.usask.ca:10388/ETD-2014-04-1536 2023-05-15T16:16:41+02:00 Kihci-Asotamâtowin (The Treaty Sovereigns' Sacred Agreements) and The Crown's Constitutional Obligations to Holders of Treaty Rights through Consultation and Restoration of Treaty Constitutionalism. Bitternose, Leah Henderson, James Sakej Y. Zlotkin, Norman Newman, Dwight Von Tigerstrom, Barbara Coyle, Michael April 2014 http://hdl.handle.net/10388/ETD-2014-04-1536 eng eng University of Saskatchewan http://hdl.handle.net/10388/ETD-2014-04-1536 TC-SSU-2014041536 Kihci-Asotamâtowin The Treaty Sovereigns' Sacred Agreements The Crown's Constitutional Obligations Treaty Rights Treaty Constitutionalism text Thesis 2014 ftusaskatchewan 2022-01-17T11:52:46Z ABSTRACT The purpose of this thesis is to assess the Crown’s Constitutional duty of consultation and its application on the holders of Treaty rights. Indigenous legal and Constitutional orders are the underpinning of the consensual Treaties. They were negotiated by sovereign nations through mutual consent and established a distinct Constitutional authority establishing rights, responsibilities and rules of coexistence. Their implementation is a Crown Constitutional obligation. This thesis argues that the duty to consult jurisprudence reveals systemic colonial problems in the common law Treaty rights paradigm by colonial interpretation, unilateral abridgement and justified infringement of the consensual Treaty. Further, judicial and politically created doctrines of the honour of the Crown and reconciliation are rendered meaningless when used as part of the ongoing colonial paradigm and abridgement of Treaties. This thesis argues that Canada must enter a post-colonial era by giving content to Indigenous legal and Constitutional orders by implementing Treaty through Treaty Constitutionalism. This requires Canada to undertake a Constitutional paradigm shift to accord the sacred and inviolable Treaties their proper place as foundational instruments in the building of Canada. This means, as well, that the only forum for proper consultation on the numbered Treaties is through Constitutional conferences with full and equal participation of Treaty First Nations. Thesis First Nations University of Saskatchewan: eCommons@USASK Canada
institution Open Polar
collection University of Saskatchewan: eCommons@USASK
op_collection_id ftusaskatchewan
language English
topic Kihci-Asotamâtowin
The Treaty Sovereigns' Sacred Agreements
The Crown's Constitutional Obligations
Treaty Rights
Treaty Constitutionalism
spellingShingle Kihci-Asotamâtowin
The Treaty Sovereigns' Sacred Agreements
The Crown's Constitutional Obligations
Treaty Rights
Treaty Constitutionalism
Bitternose, Leah
Kihci-Asotamâtowin (The Treaty Sovereigns' Sacred Agreements) and The Crown's Constitutional Obligations to Holders of Treaty Rights through Consultation and Restoration of Treaty Constitutionalism.
topic_facet Kihci-Asotamâtowin
The Treaty Sovereigns' Sacred Agreements
The Crown's Constitutional Obligations
Treaty Rights
Treaty Constitutionalism
description ABSTRACT The purpose of this thesis is to assess the Crown’s Constitutional duty of consultation and its application on the holders of Treaty rights. Indigenous legal and Constitutional orders are the underpinning of the consensual Treaties. They were negotiated by sovereign nations through mutual consent and established a distinct Constitutional authority establishing rights, responsibilities and rules of coexistence. Their implementation is a Crown Constitutional obligation. This thesis argues that the duty to consult jurisprudence reveals systemic colonial problems in the common law Treaty rights paradigm by colonial interpretation, unilateral abridgement and justified infringement of the consensual Treaty. Further, judicial and politically created doctrines of the honour of the Crown and reconciliation are rendered meaningless when used as part of the ongoing colonial paradigm and abridgement of Treaties. This thesis argues that Canada must enter a post-colonial era by giving content to Indigenous legal and Constitutional orders by implementing Treaty through Treaty Constitutionalism. This requires Canada to undertake a Constitutional paradigm shift to accord the sacred and inviolable Treaties their proper place as foundational instruments in the building of Canada. This means, as well, that the only forum for proper consultation on the numbered Treaties is through Constitutional conferences with full and equal participation of Treaty First Nations.
author2 Henderson, James Sakej Y.
Zlotkin, Norman
Newman, Dwight
Von Tigerstrom, Barbara
Coyle, Michael
format Thesis
author Bitternose, Leah
author_facet Bitternose, Leah
author_sort Bitternose, Leah
title Kihci-Asotamâtowin (The Treaty Sovereigns' Sacred Agreements) and The Crown's Constitutional Obligations to Holders of Treaty Rights through Consultation and Restoration of Treaty Constitutionalism.
title_short Kihci-Asotamâtowin (The Treaty Sovereigns' Sacred Agreements) and The Crown's Constitutional Obligations to Holders of Treaty Rights through Consultation and Restoration of Treaty Constitutionalism.
title_full Kihci-Asotamâtowin (The Treaty Sovereigns' Sacred Agreements) and The Crown's Constitutional Obligations to Holders of Treaty Rights through Consultation and Restoration of Treaty Constitutionalism.
title_fullStr Kihci-Asotamâtowin (The Treaty Sovereigns' Sacred Agreements) and The Crown's Constitutional Obligations to Holders of Treaty Rights through Consultation and Restoration of Treaty Constitutionalism.
title_full_unstemmed Kihci-Asotamâtowin (The Treaty Sovereigns' Sacred Agreements) and The Crown's Constitutional Obligations to Holders of Treaty Rights through Consultation and Restoration of Treaty Constitutionalism.
title_sort kihci-asotamâtowin (the treaty sovereigns' sacred agreements) and the crown's constitutional obligations to holders of treaty rights through consultation and restoration of treaty constitutionalism.
publisher University of Saskatchewan
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10388/ETD-2014-04-1536
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/10388/ETD-2014-04-1536
TC-SSU-2014041536
_version_ 1766002546370936832