Экономико-экологическая оценка изменения землепользования (на примере Карелии)
Land use change and a shift in economic activity often bring to unpredictable consequences for local ecosystems. There is a necessity of making preliminary evaluation and analysis of comparing the different types of economic and ecological transformation, including cost and benefit analysis, not onl...
Published in: | Economy of Region |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
Institute of Economics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/91660 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85021121252&doi=10.17059%2f2017-2-8&partnerID=40&md5=fe5459e4c04cc9cbfc0c1d6079ce3393 https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-2-8 |
id |
fturalfuniv:oai:elar.urfu.ru:10995/91660 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
fturalfuniv:oai:elar.urfu.ru:10995/91660 2024-01-21T10:07:44+01:00 Экономико-экологическая оценка изменения землепользования (на примере Карелии) Economic and ecological evaluation of land use change: Evidence from Karelia Strokov, A. S. Yakubovich, E. N. Krasilnikov, P. V. Строков, А. С. Якубович, Е. Н. Красильников, П. В. 2017 application/pdf http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/91660 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85021121252&doi=10.17059%2f2017-2-8&partnerID=40&md5=fe5459e4c04cc9cbfc0c1d6079ce3393 https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-2-8 ru rus Institute of Economics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences Институт экономики Уральского отделения РАН info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/RSF//14-38-00023 Экономика региона. 2017. Том 13, выпуск 2 Строков А. С. Экономико-экологическая оценка изменения землепользования (на примере Карелии) / А. С. Строков, Е. Н. Якубович, П. В. Красильников. — DOI 10.17059/2017-2-8. — Текст : электронный // Экономика региона. — 2017. — Том 13, выпуск 2. — С. 422-433. 2411-1406 2072-6414 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85021121252&doi=10.17059%2f2017-2-8&partnerID=40&md5=fe5459e4c04cc9cbfc0c1d6079ce3393 WOS:000403655000008 http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/91660 doi:10.17059/2017-2-8 85021121252 000403655000008 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ANIMAL HUSBANDRY COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS ECOSYSTEM SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS KARELIA LAND DEGRADATION PEAT MINING RUSSIA WETLANDS Article info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2017 fturalfuniv https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-2-810.17059/2017-2-8. 2023-12-26T01:59:54Z Land use change and a shift in economic activity often bring to unpredictable consequences for local ecosystems. There is a necessity of making preliminary evaluation and analysis of comparing the different types of economic and ecological transformation, including cost and benefit analysis, not only for business and local population, but for the whole environment. We give an example of a particular animal husbandry farm in Karelia and show how potential change in economic specialization can be effective on a 10 years horizon. Among other land use types, we chose peat mining and wetland conservation. Each type of activities was complexly evaluated with different types of costs and benefits. In the paper, we use a method of land use change evaluation including the value of ecosystem services. The monetary values of ecosystem services are given with the respect to foreign analogues and taking into account local realities and prices. Our results have shown that the most beneficial for the society and the environment is wetland conservation, due to their berries picking service, which are highly appreciated on the market, and due to low costs for the third parties, since wetlands contain regulative and refinery services for local ecosystems. As a contrary peat mining is a profitable business, but pollutes the environment because of carbon emissions into the atmosphere. The current specialization for animal husbandry is neither an optimal solution because of low profitability of the chosen farm. The results of the research can be used for optimization in regional politics in the sphere of agriculture and environment economics in order to protect the ecological balance between human activities and nature. Дан анализ возможной смены землепользования и хозяйственной деятельности одного из хозяйств Пряжинского национального района Республики Карелии. Представлен метод оценки экономической прибыли от восстановления земель с учетом экономической оценки экосистемных услуг. The article has been prepared with the support ... Article in Journal/Newspaper karelia* Ural Federal University (URFU): ELAR Economy of Region 422 433 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Ural Federal University (URFU): ELAR |
op_collection_id |
fturalfuniv |
language |
Russian |
topic |
ANIMAL HUSBANDRY COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS ECOSYSTEM SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS KARELIA LAND DEGRADATION PEAT MINING RUSSIA WETLANDS |
spellingShingle |
ANIMAL HUSBANDRY COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS ECOSYSTEM SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS KARELIA LAND DEGRADATION PEAT MINING RUSSIA WETLANDS Strokov, A. S. Yakubovich, E. N. Krasilnikov, P. V. Строков, А. С. Якубович, Е. Н. Красильников, П. В. Экономико-экологическая оценка изменения землепользования (на примере Карелии) |
topic_facet |
ANIMAL HUSBANDRY COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS ECOSYSTEM SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS KARELIA LAND DEGRADATION PEAT MINING RUSSIA WETLANDS |
description |
Land use change and a shift in economic activity often bring to unpredictable consequences for local ecosystems. There is a necessity of making preliminary evaluation and analysis of comparing the different types of economic and ecological transformation, including cost and benefit analysis, not only for business and local population, but for the whole environment. We give an example of a particular animal husbandry farm in Karelia and show how potential change in economic specialization can be effective on a 10 years horizon. Among other land use types, we chose peat mining and wetland conservation. Each type of activities was complexly evaluated with different types of costs and benefits. In the paper, we use a method of land use change evaluation including the value of ecosystem services. The monetary values of ecosystem services are given with the respect to foreign analogues and taking into account local realities and prices. Our results have shown that the most beneficial for the society and the environment is wetland conservation, due to their berries picking service, which are highly appreciated on the market, and due to low costs for the third parties, since wetlands contain regulative and refinery services for local ecosystems. As a contrary peat mining is a profitable business, but pollutes the environment because of carbon emissions into the atmosphere. The current specialization for animal husbandry is neither an optimal solution because of low profitability of the chosen farm. The results of the research can be used for optimization in regional politics in the sphere of agriculture and environment economics in order to protect the ecological balance between human activities and nature. Дан анализ возможной смены землепользования и хозяйственной деятельности одного из хозяйств Пряжинского национального района Республики Карелии. Представлен метод оценки экономической прибыли от восстановления земель с учетом экономической оценки экосистемных услуг. The article has been prepared with the support ... |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Strokov, A. S. Yakubovich, E. N. Krasilnikov, P. V. Строков, А. С. Якубович, Е. Н. Красильников, П. В. |
author_facet |
Strokov, A. S. Yakubovich, E. N. Krasilnikov, P. V. Строков, А. С. Якубович, Е. Н. Красильников, П. В. |
author_sort |
Strokov, A. S. |
title |
Экономико-экологическая оценка изменения землепользования (на примере Карелии) |
title_short |
Экономико-экологическая оценка изменения землепользования (на примере Карелии) |
title_full |
Экономико-экологическая оценка изменения землепользования (на примере Карелии) |
title_fullStr |
Экономико-экологическая оценка изменения землепользования (на примере Карелии) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Экономико-экологическая оценка изменения землепользования (на примере Карелии) |
title_sort |
экономико-экологическая оценка изменения землепользования (на примере карелии) |
publisher |
Institute of Economics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/91660 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85021121252&doi=10.17059%2f2017-2-8&partnerID=40&md5=fe5459e4c04cc9cbfc0c1d6079ce3393 https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-2-8 |
genre |
karelia* |
genre_facet |
karelia* |
op_relation |
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/RSF//14-38-00023 Экономика региона. 2017. Том 13, выпуск 2 Строков А. С. Экономико-экологическая оценка изменения землепользования (на примере Карелии) / А. С. Строков, Е. Н. Якубович, П. В. Красильников. — DOI 10.17059/2017-2-8. — Текст : электронный // Экономика региона. — 2017. — Том 13, выпуск 2. — С. 422-433. 2411-1406 2072-6414 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85021121252&doi=10.17059%2f2017-2-8&partnerID=40&md5=fe5459e4c04cc9cbfc0c1d6079ce3393 WOS:000403655000008 http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/91660 doi:10.17059/2017-2-8 85021121252 000403655000008 |
op_rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-2-810.17059/2017-2-8. |
container_title |
Economy of Region |
container_start_page |
422 |
op_container_end_page |
433 |
_version_ |
1788698349909573632 |