Экономико-экологическая оценка изменения землепользования (на примере Карелии)

Land use change and a shift in economic activity often bring to unpredictable consequences for local ecosystems. There is a necessity of making preliminary evaluation and analysis of comparing the different types of economic and ecological transformation, including cost and benefit analysis, not onl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Economy of Region
Main Authors: Strokov, A. S., Yakubovich, E. N., Krasilnikov, P. V., Строков, А. С., Якубович, Е. Н., Красильников, П. В.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:Russian
Published: Institute of Economics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/91660
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85021121252&doi=10.17059%2f2017-2-8&partnerID=40&md5=fe5459e4c04cc9cbfc0c1d6079ce3393
https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-2-8
id fturalfuniv:oai:elar.urfu.ru:10995/91660
record_format openpolar
spelling fturalfuniv:oai:elar.urfu.ru:10995/91660 2024-01-21T10:07:44+01:00 Экономико-экологическая оценка изменения землепользования (на примере Карелии) Economic and ecological evaluation of land use change: Evidence from Karelia Strokov, A. S. Yakubovich, E. N. Krasilnikov, P. V. Строков, А. С. Якубович, Е. Н. Красильников, П. В. 2017 application/pdf http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/91660 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85021121252&doi=10.17059%2f2017-2-8&partnerID=40&md5=fe5459e4c04cc9cbfc0c1d6079ce3393 https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-2-8 ru rus Institute of Economics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences Институт экономики Уральского отделения РАН info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/RSF//14-38-00023 Экономика региона. 2017. Том 13, выпуск 2 Строков А. С. Экономико-экологическая оценка изменения землепользования (на примере Карелии) / А. С. Строков, Е. Н. Якубович, П. В. Красильников. — DOI 10.17059/2017-2-8. — Текст : электронный // Экономика региона. — 2017. — Том 13, выпуск 2. — С. 422-433. 2411-1406 2072-6414 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85021121252&doi=10.17059%2f2017-2-8&partnerID=40&md5=fe5459e4c04cc9cbfc0c1d6079ce3393 WOS:000403655000008 http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/91660 doi:10.17059/2017-2-8 85021121252 000403655000008 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ANIMAL HUSBANDRY COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS ECOSYSTEM SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS KARELIA LAND DEGRADATION PEAT MINING RUSSIA WETLANDS Article info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2017 fturalfuniv https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-2-810.17059/2017-2-8. 2023-12-26T01:59:54Z Land use change and a shift in economic activity often bring to unpredictable consequences for local ecosystems. There is a necessity of making preliminary evaluation and analysis of comparing the different types of economic and ecological transformation, including cost and benefit analysis, not only for business and local population, but for the whole environment. We give an example of a particular animal husbandry farm in Karelia and show how potential change in economic specialization can be effective on a 10 years horizon. Among other land use types, we chose peat mining and wetland conservation. Each type of activities was complexly evaluated with different types of costs and benefits. In the paper, we use a method of land use change evaluation including the value of ecosystem services. The monetary values of ecosystem services are given with the respect to foreign analogues and taking into account local realities and prices. Our results have shown that the most beneficial for the society and the environment is wetland conservation, due to their berries picking service, which are highly appreciated on the market, and due to low costs for the third parties, since wetlands contain regulative and refinery services for local ecosystems. As a contrary peat mining is a profitable business, but pollutes the environment because of carbon emissions into the atmosphere. The current specialization for animal husbandry is neither an optimal solution because of low profitability of the chosen farm. The results of the research can be used for optimization in regional politics in the sphere of agriculture and environment economics in order to protect the ecological balance between human activities and nature. Дан анализ возможной смены землепользования и хозяйственной деятельности одного из хозяйств Пряжинского национального района Республики Карелии. Представлен метод оценки экономической прибыли от восстановления земель с учетом экономической оценки экосистемных услуг. The article has been prepared with the support ... Article in Journal/Newspaper karelia* Ural Federal University (URFU): ELAR Economy of Region 422 433
institution Open Polar
collection Ural Federal University (URFU): ELAR
op_collection_id fturalfuniv
language Russian
topic ANIMAL HUSBANDRY
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS
KARELIA
LAND DEGRADATION
PEAT MINING
RUSSIA
WETLANDS
spellingShingle ANIMAL HUSBANDRY
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS
KARELIA
LAND DEGRADATION
PEAT MINING
RUSSIA
WETLANDS
Strokov, A. S.
Yakubovich, E. N.
Krasilnikov, P. V.
Строков, А. С.
Якубович, Е. Н.
Красильников, П. В.
Экономико-экологическая оценка изменения землепользования (на примере Карелии)
topic_facet ANIMAL HUSBANDRY
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS
KARELIA
LAND DEGRADATION
PEAT MINING
RUSSIA
WETLANDS
description Land use change and a shift in economic activity often bring to unpredictable consequences for local ecosystems. There is a necessity of making preliminary evaluation and analysis of comparing the different types of economic and ecological transformation, including cost and benefit analysis, not only for business and local population, but for the whole environment. We give an example of a particular animal husbandry farm in Karelia and show how potential change in economic specialization can be effective on a 10 years horizon. Among other land use types, we chose peat mining and wetland conservation. Each type of activities was complexly evaluated with different types of costs and benefits. In the paper, we use a method of land use change evaluation including the value of ecosystem services. The monetary values of ecosystem services are given with the respect to foreign analogues and taking into account local realities and prices. Our results have shown that the most beneficial for the society and the environment is wetland conservation, due to their berries picking service, which are highly appreciated on the market, and due to low costs for the third parties, since wetlands contain regulative and refinery services for local ecosystems. As a contrary peat mining is a profitable business, but pollutes the environment because of carbon emissions into the atmosphere. The current specialization for animal husbandry is neither an optimal solution because of low profitability of the chosen farm. The results of the research can be used for optimization in regional politics in the sphere of agriculture and environment economics in order to protect the ecological balance between human activities and nature. Дан анализ возможной смены землепользования и хозяйственной деятельности одного из хозяйств Пряжинского национального района Республики Карелии. Представлен метод оценки экономической прибыли от восстановления земель с учетом экономической оценки экосистемных услуг. The article has been prepared with the support ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Strokov, A. S.
Yakubovich, E. N.
Krasilnikov, P. V.
Строков, А. С.
Якубович, Е. Н.
Красильников, П. В.
author_facet Strokov, A. S.
Yakubovich, E. N.
Krasilnikov, P. V.
Строков, А. С.
Якубович, Е. Н.
Красильников, П. В.
author_sort Strokov, A. S.
title Экономико-экологическая оценка изменения землепользования (на примере Карелии)
title_short Экономико-экологическая оценка изменения землепользования (на примере Карелии)
title_full Экономико-экологическая оценка изменения землепользования (на примере Карелии)
title_fullStr Экономико-экологическая оценка изменения землепользования (на примере Карелии)
title_full_unstemmed Экономико-экологическая оценка изменения землепользования (на примере Карелии)
title_sort экономико-экологическая оценка изменения землепользования (на примере карелии)
publisher Institute of Economics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
publishDate 2017
url http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/91660
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85021121252&doi=10.17059%2f2017-2-8&partnerID=40&md5=fe5459e4c04cc9cbfc0c1d6079ce3393
https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-2-8
genre karelia*
genre_facet karelia*
op_relation info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/RSF//14-38-00023
Экономика региона. 2017. Том 13, выпуск 2
Строков А. С. Экономико-экологическая оценка изменения землепользования (на примере Карелии) / А. С. Строков, Е. Н. Якубович, П. В. Красильников. — DOI 10.17059/2017-2-8. — Текст : электронный // Экономика региона. — 2017. — Том 13, выпуск 2. — С. 422-433.
2411-1406
2072-6414
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85021121252&doi=10.17059%2f2017-2-8&partnerID=40&md5=fe5459e4c04cc9cbfc0c1d6079ce3393
WOS:000403655000008
http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/91660
doi:10.17059/2017-2-8
85021121252
000403655000008
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-2-810.17059/2017-2-8.
container_title Economy of Region
container_start_page 422
op_container_end_page 433
_version_ 1788698349909573632