В поисках «выхода из тупика»: транссибирские транспортные проекты конца XIX – начала XX в.
The article was submitted on 16.05.2018. Referring to a large number of journalistic works of the turn of the 20th century that reflect the views of different business, political, and social groups, the author analyses the narrative strategies underlying the representation of both implemented and hy...
Published in: | QUAESTIO ROSSICA |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
Издательство Уральского университета
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/63065 https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36430514 https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2018.3.327 |
id |
fturalfuniv:oai:elar.urfu.ru:10995/63065 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
fturalfuniv:oai:elar.urfu.ru:10995/63065 2024-01-21T10:07:42+01:00 В поисках «выхода из тупика»: транссибирские транспортные проекты конца XIX – начала XX в. Looking for a Way out: Trans-Siberian Transportation Projects at the Turn of the 20th Century Агапов, М. Agapov, М. 2018 application/pdf http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/63065 https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36430514 https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2018.3.327 ru rus Издательство Уральского университета Quaestio Rossica. 2018. Т. 6. № 3 Агапов М. В поисках «выхода из тупика»: транссибирские транспортные проекты конца XIX – начала XX в. / М. Агапов // Quaestio Rossica. — 2018. — Т. 6, № 3. — С. 771-783. 2313-6871 2311-911X http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/63065 https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36430514 doi:10.15826/qr.2018.3.327 85055192617 WOS:000456117000011 GEOGRAPHIC IMAGINATION TRANSPORT ROUTES TRANS-SIBERIAN RAILWAY SIBERIAN RIVER ROUTES NORTHERN SEA ROUTE НОВАЯ ПРОСТРАНСТВЕННАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ГЕОГРАФИЧЕСКОЕ ВООБРАЖЕНИЕ ПУТИ СООБЩЕНИЯ ТРАНССИБИРСКАЯ ЖЕЛЕЗНОДОРОЖНАЯ МАГИСТРАЛЬ ВЕЛИКИЙ СИБИРСКИЙ РЕЧНОЙ ПУТЬ СЕВЕРНЫЙ МОРСКОЙ ПУТЬ Article info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2018 fturalfuniv https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2018.3.327 2023-12-26T01:44:48Z The article was submitted on 16.05.2018. Referring to a large number of journalistic works of the turn of the 20th century that reflect the views of different business, political, and social groups, the author analyses the narrative strategies underlying the representation of both implemented and hypothetical Trans-Siberian transportation projects. The article aims to explicate the cultural attitudes and political goals of the authors of the transportation projects which formed their strategies of mental appropriation of territories. The author singles out and analyses three aspects related to the perception of Siberian space: imperial, regional, and transnational. According to the first aspect, Siberian space was regarded as an enormous geopolitical bridge meant to connect the centre of the country with remote Russian territories (the Far East) and Russia’s spheres of influence (Manchuria, Northeast China). This approach was implemented when the Great Siberian Railway was built and came to represent a horizontal distribution of power, connecting the imperial centre and the periphery. The regional idea of Siberia was a metaphor of its closedness: this was not induced by its nature but rather by artificial economic reasons. The Russian government favoured the export of Siberian butter but not that of grain. The Great Siberian Railway was thus regarded as a means of improving foreign trade. However, this route for Siberian grain was closed following the introduction of the Chelyabinsk railway tariff in 1896. Under such circumstances, Siberians had to resort to the idea of the 1860s–1870s of organising a transit trade route from Siberia to Europe. At the turn of the 20th century, there appeared two approaches to how this could be fulfilled: by joining the basins of Siberian and Central Russian rivers (Siberian River Routes) or establishing a connection between these rivers by means of the Kara Sea (Northern Sea Route). According to the third – transnational – aspect, all three routes were regarded as elements of ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Kara Sea Northern Sea Route Siberia Ural Federal University (URFU): ELAR Kara Sea QUAESTIO ROSSICA 6 3 771 783 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Ural Federal University (URFU): ELAR |
op_collection_id |
fturalfuniv |
language |
Russian |
topic |
GEOGRAPHIC IMAGINATION TRANSPORT ROUTES TRANS-SIBERIAN RAILWAY SIBERIAN RIVER ROUTES NORTHERN SEA ROUTE НОВАЯ ПРОСТРАНСТВЕННАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ГЕОГРАФИЧЕСКОЕ ВООБРАЖЕНИЕ ПУТИ СООБЩЕНИЯ ТРАНССИБИРСКАЯ ЖЕЛЕЗНОДОРОЖНАЯ МАГИСТРАЛЬ ВЕЛИКИЙ СИБИРСКИЙ РЕЧНОЙ ПУТЬ СЕВЕРНЫЙ МОРСКОЙ ПУТЬ |
spellingShingle |
GEOGRAPHIC IMAGINATION TRANSPORT ROUTES TRANS-SIBERIAN RAILWAY SIBERIAN RIVER ROUTES NORTHERN SEA ROUTE НОВАЯ ПРОСТРАНСТВЕННАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ГЕОГРАФИЧЕСКОЕ ВООБРАЖЕНИЕ ПУТИ СООБЩЕНИЯ ТРАНССИБИРСКАЯ ЖЕЛЕЗНОДОРОЖНАЯ МАГИСТРАЛЬ ВЕЛИКИЙ СИБИРСКИЙ РЕЧНОЙ ПУТЬ СЕВЕРНЫЙ МОРСКОЙ ПУТЬ Агапов, М. Agapov, М. В поисках «выхода из тупика»: транссибирские транспортные проекты конца XIX – начала XX в. |
topic_facet |
GEOGRAPHIC IMAGINATION TRANSPORT ROUTES TRANS-SIBERIAN RAILWAY SIBERIAN RIVER ROUTES NORTHERN SEA ROUTE НОВАЯ ПРОСТРАНСТВЕННАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ГЕОГРАФИЧЕСКОЕ ВООБРАЖЕНИЕ ПУТИ СООБЩЕНИЯ ТРАНССИБИРСКАЯ ЖЕЛЕЗНОДОРОЖНАЯ МАГИСТРАЛЬ ВЕЛИКИЙ СИБИРСКИЙ РЕЧНОЙ ПУТЬ СЕВЕРНЫЙ МОРСКОЙ ПУТЬ |
description |
The article was submitted on 16.05.2018. Referring to a large number of journalistic works of the turn of the 20th century that reflect the views of different business, political, and social groups, the author analyses the narrative strategies underlying the representation of both implemented and hypothetical Trans-Siberian transportation projects. The article aims to explicate the cultural attitudes and political goals of the authors of the transportation projects which formed their strategies of mental appropriation of territories. The author singles out and analyses three aspects related to the perception of Siberian space: imperial, regional, and transnational. According to the first aspect, Siberian space was regarded as an enormous geopolitical bridge meant to connect the centre of the country with remote Russian territories (the Far East) and Russia’s spheres of influence (Manchuria, Northeast China). This approach was implemented when the Great Siberian Railway was built and came to represent a horizontal distribution of power, connecting the imperial centre and the periphery. The regional idea of Siberia was a metaphor of its closedness: this was not induced by its nature but rather by artificial economic reasons. The Russian government favoured the export of Siberian butter but not that of grain. The Great Siberian Railway was thus regarded as a means of improving foreign trade. However, this route for Siberian grain was closed following the introduction of the Chelyabinsk railway tariff in 1896. Under such circumstances, Siberians had to resort to the idea of the 1860s–1870s of organising a transit trade route from Siberia to Europe. At the turn of the 20th century, there appeared two approaches to how this could be fulfilled: by joining the basins of Siberian and Central Russian rivers (Siberian River Routes) or establishing a connection between these rivers by means of the Kara Sea (Northern Sea Route). According to the third – transnational – aspect, all three routes were regarded as elements of ... |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Агапов, М. Agapov, М. |
author_facet |
Агапов, М. Agapov, М. |
author_sort |
Агапов, М. |
title |
В поисках «выхода из тупика»: транссибирские транспортные проекты конца XIX – начала XX в. |
title_short |
В поисках «выхода из тупика»: транссибирские транспортные проекты конца XIX – начала XX в. |
title_full |
В поисках «выхода из тупика»: транссибирские транспортные проекты конца XIX – начала XX в. |
title_fullStr |
В поисках «выхода из тупика»: транссибирские транспортные проекты конца XIX – начала XX в. |
title_full_unstemmed |
В поисках «выхода из тупика»: транссибирские транспортные проекты конца XIX – начала XX в. |
title_sort |
в поисках «выхода из тупика»: транссибирские транспортные проекты конца xix – начала xx в. |
publisher |
Издательство Уральского университета |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/63065 https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36430514 https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2018.3.327 |
geographic |
Kara Sea |
geographic_facet |
Kara Sea |
genre |
Kara Sea Northern Sea Route Siberia |
genre_facet |
Kara Sea Northern Sea Route Siberia |
op_relation |
Quaestio Rossica. 2018. Т. 6. № 3 Агапов М. В поисках «выхода из тупика»: транссибирские транспортные проекты конца XIX – начала XX в. / М. Агапов // Quaestio Rossica. — 2018. — Т. 6, № 3. — С. 771-783. 2313-6871 2311-911X http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/63065 https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36430514 doi:10.15826/qr.2018.3.327 85055192617 WOS:000456117000011 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2018.3.327 |
container_title |
QUAESTIO ROSSICA |
container_volume |
6 |
container_issue |
3 |
container_start_page |
771 |
op_container_end_page |
783 |
_version_ |
1788698319476752384 |