The European Union in the Arctic: A Pole Position? Bruges Regional Integration & Global Governance Papers 4/2012, December 2012

With temperatures in the Arctic rising at twice the pace of anywhere else in the world, the European Union (EU) decided in 2008 to begin formulating an overall Arctic policy tackling maritime, environmental, energy and transport challenges. This attempt to draft a comprehensive policy on a topic tha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daemers, Julien
Format: Report
Language:unknown
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://aei.pitt.edu/38343/
http://aei.pitt.edu/38343/1/BRIGG_2012%2D4.pdf
http://www.coleurope.eu/sites/default/files/research-paper/brigg_2012_daemers.pdf
id ftupittaei:oai:aei.pitt.edu:38343
record_format openpolar
spelling ftupittaei:oai:aei.pitt.edu:38343 2023-05-15T14:23:31+02:00 The European Union in the Arctic: A Pole Position? Bruges Regional Integration & Global Governance Papers 4/2012, December 2012 Daemers, Julien 2012-12 application/pdf http://aei.pitt.edu/38343/ http://aei.pitt.edu/38343/1/BRIGG_2012%2D4.pdf http://www.coleurope.eu/sites/default/files/research-paper/brigg_2012_daemers.pdf unknown http://aei.pitt.edu/38343/1/BRIGG_2012%2D4.pdf Daemers, Julien (2012) The European Union in the Arctic: A Pole Position? Bruges Regional Integration & Global Governance Papers 4/2012, December 2012. [Working Paper] energy policy (Including international arena) environmental policy (including international arena) Russia China Working Paper NonPeerReviewed 2012 ftupittaei 2019-06-03T19:51:50Z With temperatures in the Arctic rising at twice the pace of anywhere else in the world, the European Union (EU) decided in 2008 to begin formulating an overall Arctic policy tackling maritime, environmental, energy and transport challenges. This attempt to draft a comprehensive policy on a topic that the EU had rarely touched upon unavoidably ran up against other existing strategies from Arctic and non-Arctic states. Against this background, this paper examines whether the EU’s current Arctic policy is conducive to framing a strategy that is both correctly targeted and flexible enough to represent Europe’s interests. It shows that the EU’s approach can serve as an effective foreign policy tool to establish the Union’s legitimacy as an Arctic player. However, the EU’s Arctic policy is still underestimating its potential to find common grounds with the strategic partners Russia and China. A properly targeted Arctic policy could help influence Russia over the EU’s interests in the Northern Sea Route and strengthen cooperation with China in an endeavour to gain recognition as relevant Arctic players. Report Arctic Arctic Northern Sea Route University of Pittsburgh: Archive of European Integration (AEI) Arctic Endeavour ENVELOPE(162.000,162.000,-76.550,-76.550)
institution Open Polar
collection University of Pittsburgh: Archive of European Integration (AEI)
op_collection_id ftupittaei
language unknown
topic energy policy (Including international arena)
environmental policy (including international arena)
Russia
China
spellingShingle energy policy (Including international arena)
environmental policy (including international arena)
Russia
China
Daemers, Julien
The European Union in the Arctic: A Pole Position? Bruges Regional Integration & Global Governance Papers 4/2012, December 2012
topic_facet energy policy (Including international arena)
environmental policy (including international arena)
Russia
China
description With temperatures in the Arctic rising at twice the pace of anywhere else in the world, the European Union (EU) decided in 2008 to begin formulating an overall Arctic policy tackling maritime, environmental, energy and transport challenges. This attempt to draft a comprehensive policy on a topic that the EU had rarely touched upon unavoidably ran up against other existing strategies from Arctic and non-Arctic states. Against this background, this paper examines whether the EU’s current Arctic policy is conducive to framing a strategy that is both correctly targeted and flexible enough to represent Europe’s interests. It shows that the EU’s approach can serve as an effective foreign policy tool to establish the Union’s legitimacy as an Arctic player. However, the EU’s Arctic policy is still underestimating its potential to find common grounds with the strategic partners Russia and China. A properly targeted Arctic policy could help influence Russia over the EU’s interests in the Northern Sea Route and strengthen cooperation with China in an endeavour to gain recognition as relevant Arctic players.
format Report
author Daemers, Julien
author_facet Daemers, Julien
author_sort Daemers, Julien
title The European Union in the Arctic: A Pole Position? Bruges Regional Integration & Global Governance Papers 4/2012, December 2012
title_short The European Union in the Arctic: A Pole Position? Bruges Regional Integration & Global Governance Papers 4/2012, December 2012
title_full The European Union in the Arctic: A Pole Position? Bruges Regional Integration & Global Governance Papers 4/2012, December 2012
title_fullStr The European Union in the Arctic: A Pole Position? Bruges Regional Integration & Global Governance Papers 4/2012, December 2012
title_full_unstemmed The European Union in the Arctic: A Pole Position? Bruges Regional Integration & Global Governance Papers 4/2012, December 2012
title_sort european union in the arctic: a pole position? bruges regional integration & global governance papers 4/2012, december 2012
publishDate 2012
url http://aei.pitt.edu/38343/
http://aei.pitt.edu/38343/1/BRIGG_2012%2D4.pdf
http://www.coleurope.eu/sites/default/files/research-paper/brigg_2012_daemers.pdf
long_lat ENVELOPE(162.000,162.000,-76.550,-76.550)
geographic Arctic
Endeavour
geographic_facet Arctic
Endeavour
genre Arctic
Arctic
Northern Sea Route
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic
Northern Sea Route
op_relation http://aei.pitt.edu/38343/1/BRIGG_2012%2D4.pdf
Daemers, Julien (2012) The European Union in the Arctic: A Pole Position? Bruges Regional Integration & Global Governance Papers 4/2012, December 2012. [Working Paper]
_version_ 1766296051889733632