Indigenous internal self-determination in Australia and Norway

This thesis compares the history and politics of the “Indigenous question” in Norway and Australia, using the Norwegian experience as a point of reference for a critical examination of the prevailing discourse and policies in Australia. Although the territory inhabited by the Sami extends into four...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Solberg, Pia
Format: Doctoral or Postdoctoral Thesis
Language:English
Published: UNSW, Sydney 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/56971
https://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/bitstreams/1a712594-a258-4cbc-9299-7e50f7965115/download
https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/19245
id ftunswworks:oai:unsworks.library.unsw.edu.au:1959.4/56971
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunswworks:oai:unsworks.library.unsw.edu.au:1959.4/56971 2023-05-15T16:12:14+02:00 Indigenous internal self-determination in Australia and Norway Solberg, Pia 2016 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/56971 https://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/bitstreams/1a712594-a258-4cbc-9299-7e50f7965115/download https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/19245 EN eng UNSW, Sydney http://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/56971 https://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/bitstreams/1a712594-a258-4cbc-9299-7e50f7965115/download https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/19245 open access https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/ free_to_read CC-BY-NC-ND internal self-determination Self-determination Sami Aboriginal doctoral thesis http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06 2016 ftunswworks https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/19245 2022-08-09T07:40:13Z This thesis compares the history and politics of the “Indigenous question” in Norway and Australia, using the Norwegian experience as a point of reference for a critical examination of the prevailing discourse and policies in Australia. Although the territory inhabited by the Sami extends into four states – Norway, Sweden, Finland and Russia – the Norwegian Sami have been the most active in global campaigns for Indigenous rights, and the Norwegian state has adopted the most developed policies designed to implement such rights. At the same time, the Norwegian Sami – in sharp contrast to the shocking poverty and social disadvantage of Aboriginal Australians – enjoy a relatively high standard of living. The relationship between Indigenous rights and socio-­economic development is at the heart of the thesis. Its distinctive approach is to eschew theoretical and philosophical abstractions and focus on an exploration of the historical and political circumstances that shaped the nature and the range of possible solutions, of the problem: the very different pace and nature of colonisation, in Australia rapid and driven by the rapacious appetite of British capitalism for global expansion which had little use for the Indigenous peoples it encountered and dispossessed, in Norway/Fennoscandia a much more protracted process which allowed for some coexistence and cooperation (and mutual adaptation) between Indigenous and non-­Indigenous societies over several centuries; the strategic importance of the Sami in their geopolitically contested region; the very different (and historically changing) possibilities for economic relations and political alliances between Indigenous and non-­Indigenous interests and movements. As the first ever systematic comparison between the Sami and Aboriginal Australia (which is more commonly compared with the Maori or Native Americans), the choice of a comparative reference point outside the historical context of the British Empire and Anglo­-American political culture is in itself an original ... Doctoral or Postdoctoral Thesis Fennoscandia sami sami UNSW Sydney (The University of New South Wales): UNSWorks Norway
institution Open Polar
collection UNSW Sydney (The University of New South Wales): UNSWorks
op_collection_id ftunswworks
language English
topic internal self-determination
Self-determination
Sami
Aboriginal
spellingShingle internal self-determination
Self-determination
Sami
Aboriginal
Solberg, Pia
Indigenous internal self-determination in Australia and Norway
topic_facet internal self-determination
Self-determination
Sami
Aboriginal
description This thesis compares the history and politics of the “Indigenous question” in Norway and Australia, using the Norwegian experience as a point of reference for a critical examination of the prevailing discourse and policies in Australia. Although the territory inhabited by the Sami extends into four states – Norway, Sweden, Finland and Russia – the Norwegian Sami have been the most active in global campaigns for Indigenous rights, and the Norwegian state has adopted the most developed policies designed to implement such rights. At the same time, the Norwegian Sami – in sharp contrast to the shocking poverty and social disadvantage of Aboriginal Australians – enjoy a relatively high standard of living. The relationship between Indigenous rights and socio-­economic development is at the heart of the thesis. Its distinctive approach is to eschew theoretical and philosophical abstractions and focus on an exploration of the historical and political circumstances that shaped the nature and the range of possible solutions, of the problem: the very different pace and nature of colonisation, in Australia rapid and driven by the rapacious appetite of British capitalism for global expansion which had little use for the Indigenous peoples it encountered and dispossessed, in Norway/Fennoscandia a much more protracted process which allowed for some coexistence and cooperation (and mutual adaptation) between Indigenous and non-­Indigenous societies over several centuries; the strategic importance of the Sami in their geopolitically contested region; the very different (and historically changing) possibilities for economic relations and political alliances between Indigenous and non-­Indigenous interests and movements. As the first ever systematic comparison between the Sami and Aboriginal Australia (which is more commonly compared with the Maori or Native Americans), the choice of a comparative reference point outside the historical context of the British Empire and Anglo­-American political culture is in itself an original ...
format Doctoral or Postdoctoral Thesis
author Solberg, Pia
author_facet Solberg, Pia
author_sort Solberg, Pia
title Indigenous internal self-determination in Australia and Norway
title_short Indigenous internal self-determination in Australia and Norway
title_full Indigenous internal self-determination in Australia and Norway
title_fullStr Indigenous internal self-determination in Australia and Norway
title_full_unstemmed Indigenous internal self-determination in Australia and Norway
title_sort indigenous internal self-determination in australia and norway
publisher UNSW, Sydney
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/56971
https://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/bitstreams/1a712594-a258-4cbc-9299-7e50f7965115/download
https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/19245
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Fennoscandia
sami
sami
genre_facet Fennoscandia
sami
sami
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/56971
https://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/bitstreams/1a712594-a258-4cbc-9299-7e50f7965115/download
https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/19245
op_rights open access
https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/
free_to_read
op_rightsnorm CC-BY-NC-ND
op_doi https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/19245
_version_ 1765997495429627904