The governance of a common in the European Community, the common fisheries policy

This thesis investigates the variables that explain the behaviour of States in their national arenas regarding the implementation of collectively agreed measures within the framework of fisheries regimes. According to orthodoxy, States set up regimes to manage fish exploitation and subsequently fail...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thom, Mireille
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:unknown
Published: 1993
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.48730/t1cv-yy39
https://stax.strath.ac.uk/concern/theses/6m311p28w
id ftunsthclydestax:oai:strathclyde:6m311p28w
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunsthclydestax:oai:strathclyde:6m311p28w 2023-05-15T17:38:34+02:00 The governance of a common in the European Community, the common fisheries policy Thom, Mireille 1993 https://doi.org/10.48730/t1cv-yy39 https://stax.strath.ac.uk/concern/theses/6m311p28w unknown https://stax.strath.ac.uk/downloads/rj430480f uk.bl.ethos.294242 T8063 https://stax.strath.ac.uk/thesis_copyright_statement http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06 1993 ftunsthclydestax https://doi.org/10.48730/t1cv-yy39 2021-12-20T08:44:31Z This thesis investigates the variables that explain the behaviour of States in their national arenas regarding the implementation of collectively agreed measures within the framework of fisheries regimes. According to orthodoxy, States set up regimes to manage fish exploitation and subsequently fail to implement the policies they have devised. Overexploitation and scarcity are said to follow. Using the first ten years of the twenty year common fisheries policy, agreed in January 1983, this thesis examines and compares Implementation of Community measures in France and in the United Kingdom. Two competing conceptual approaches are tested: the sectoral policy approach and the national policy style approach. In the policy sector approach, public policy is said to show variation across sectors within countries and similarities across countries. In such a model, policy determines politics. The national policy style approach, on the other hand, predicts that policy will be shaped by national characteristics and variations In policy processes. The study demonstrates that, despite contrasting traditions, patterns of Interest representation, policy making processes, ideological background of government in power in France and the UK and timing in compliance, the substance of policy, in the implementation of fisheries measures, was strikingly similar in the two countries. Sectoral imperatives determined States' decisions more than any other variable. It was also found that the normative dimension within the European Community, absent in other arenas, made States comply in a way, which, although unsatisfactory, was still better than had been the case with the CFP's predecessor, the North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission. Other/Unknown Material North East Atlantic University of Strathclyde Glasgow: STAX
institution Open Polar
collection University of Strathclyde Glasgow: STAX
op_collection_id ftunsthclydestax
language unknown
description This thesis investigates the variables that explain the behaviour of States in their national arenas regarding the implementation of collectively agreed measures within the framework of fisheries regimes. According to orthodoxy, States set up regimes to manage fish exploitation and subsequently fail to implement the policies they have devised. Overexploitation and scarcity are said to follow. Using the first ten years of the twenty year common fisheries policy, agreed in January 1983, this thesis examines and compares Implementation of Community measures in France and in the United Kingdom. Two competing conceptual approaches are tested: the sectoral policy approach and the national policy style approach. In the policy sector approach, public policy is said to show variation across sectors within countries and similarities across countries. In such a model, policy determines politics. The national policy style approach, on the other hand, predicts that policy will be shaped by national characteristics and variations In policy processes. The study demonstrates that, despite contrasting traditions, patterns of Interest representation, policy making processes, ideological background of government in power in France and the UK and timing in compliance, the substance of policy, in the implementation of fisheries measures, was strikingly similar in the two countries. Sectoral imperatives determined States' decisions more than any other variable. It was also found that the normative dimension within the European Community, absent in other arenas, made States comply in a way, which, although unsatisfactory, was still better than had been the case with the CFP's predecessor, the North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission.
format Other/Unknown Material
author Thom, Mireille
spellingShingle Thom, Mireille
The governance of a common in the European Community, the common fisheries policy
author_facet Thom, Mireille
author_sort Thom, Mireille
title The governance of a common in the European Community, the common fisheries policy
title_short The governance of a common in the European Community, the common fisheries policy
title_full The governance of a common in the European Community, the common fisheries policy
title_fullStr The governance of a common in the European Community, the common fisheries policy
title_full_unstemmed The governance of a common in the European Community, the common fisheries policy
title_sort governance of a common in the european community, the common fisheries policy
publishDate 1993
url https://doi.org/10.48730/t1cv-yy39
https://stax.strath.ac.uk/concern/theses/6m311p28w
genre North East Atlantic
genre_facet North East Atlantic
op_relation https://stax.strath.ac.uk/downloads/rj430480f
uk.bl.ethos.294242
T8063
op_rights https://stax.strath.ac.uk/thesis_copyright_statement
op_doi https://doi.org/10.48730/t1cv-yy39
_version_ 1766139063723622400