Transmission loss patterns from acoustic harassment and deterrent devices do not always follow geometrical spreading predictions

Acoustic harassment and deterrent devices have become increasingly popular mitigation tools for negotiating the impacts of marine mammals on fisheries. The rationale for their variable effectiveness remains unexplained, but high variability in the surrounding acoustic field may be relevant. In the p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine Mammal Science
Main Authors: Shapiro, Ari D., Tougaard, Jakob, Jorgensen, Poul Boel, Kyhn, Line A., Balle, Jeppe Dalgaard, Bernardez, Cristina, Fjalling, Arne, Karlsen, Junita, Wahlberg, Magnus
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://risweb.st-andrews.ac.uk/portal/en/researchoutput/transmission-loss-patterns-from-acoustic-harassment-and-deterrent-devices-do-not-always-follow-geometrical-spreading-predictions(cdd48178-c629-46d5-a02a-8165e03e2976).html
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2008.00243.x
id ftunstandrewcris:oai:risweb.st-andrews.ac.uk:publications/cdd48178-c629-46d5-a02a-8165e03e2976
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunstandrewcris:oai:risweb.st-andrews.ac.uk:publications/cdd48178-c629-46d5-a02a-8165e03e2976 2023-05-15T17:59:13+02:00 Transmission loss patterns from acoustic harassment and deterrent devices do not always follow geometrical spreading predictions Shapiro, Ari D. Tougaard, Jakob Jorgensen, Poul Boel Kyhn, Line A. Balle, Jeppe Dalgaard Bernardez, Cristina Fjalling, Arne Karlsen, Junita Wahlberg, Magnus 2009-01 https://risweb.st-andrews.ac.uk/portal/en/researchoutput/transmission-loss-patterns-from-acoustic-harassment-and-deterrent-devices-do-not-always-follow-geometrical-spreading-predictions(cdd48178-c629-46d5-a02a-8165e03e2976).html https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2008.00243.x eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess Shapiro , A D , Tougaard , J , Jorgensen , P B , Kyhn , L A , Balle , J D , Bernardez , C , Fjalling , A , Karlsen , J & Wahlberg , M 2009 , ' Transmission loss patterns from acoustic harassment and deterrent devices do not always follow geometrical spreading predictions ' , Marine Mammal Science , vol. 25 , no. 1 , pp. 53-67 . https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2008.00243.x acoustic harassment device (AHD) acoustic deterrent device (ADD) non-geometrical acoustic spreading sound exposure level multipath interference marine mammal-fisheries interactions bycatch TEMPORARY THRESHOLD SHIFT WHALES PHYSETER-MACROCEPHALUS PORPOISES PHOCOENA-PHOCOENA BOTTLE-NOSED DOLPHINS TURSIOPS-TRUNCATUS BRITISH-COLUMBIA FISHING NETS HARBOR SEALS UNDERWATER SOUND article 2009 ftunstandrewcris https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2008.00243.x 2022-06-02T07:45:58Z Acoustic harassment and deterrent devices have become increasingly popular mitigation tools for negotiating the impacts of marine mammals on fisheries. The rationale for their variable effectiveness remains unexplained, but high variability in the surrounding acoustic field may be relevant. In the present study, the sound fields of one acoustic harassment device and three acoustic deterrent devices were measured at three study sites along the Scandinavian coast. Superimposed onto an overall trend of decreasing sound exposure levels with increasing range were large local variations in the sound level for all sources in each of the environments. This variability was likely caused by source directionality, inter-ping source level variation and multipath interference. Rapid and unpredictable variations in the sound level as a function of range deviated from expectations derived from spherical and cylindrical spreading models and conflicted with the classic concept of concentric zones of increasing disturbance with decreasing range. Under such conditions, animals may encounter difficulties when trying to determine the direction to and location of a sound source, which may complicate or jeopardize avoidance responses. Article in Journal/Newspaper Phocoena phocoena Physeter macrocephalus University of St Andrews: Research Portal Marine Mammal Science 25 1 53 67
institution Open Polar
collection University of St Andrews: Research Portal
op_collection_id ftunstandrewcris
language English
topic acoustic harassment device (AHD)
acoustic deterrent device (ADD)
non-geometrical acoustic spreading
sound exposure level
multipath interference
marine mammal-fisheries
interactions
bycatch
TEMPORARY THRESHOLD SHIFT
WHALES PHYSETER-MACROCEPHALUS
PORPOISES PHOCOENA-PHOCOENA
BOTTLE-NOSED DOLPHINS
TURSIOPS-TRUNCATUS
BRITISH-COLUMBIA
FISHING NETS
HARBOR SEALS
UNDERWATER
SOUND
spellingShingle acoustic harassment device (AHD)
acoustic deterrent device (ADD)
non-geometrical acoustic spreading
sound exposure level
multipath interference
marine mammal-fisheries
interactions
bycatch
TEMPORARY THRESHOLD SHIFT
WHALES PHYSETER-MACROCEPHALUS
PORPOISES PHOCOENA-PHOCOENA
BOTTLE-NOSED DOLPHINS
TURSIOPS-TRUNCATUS
BRITISH-COLUMBIA
FISHING NETS
HARBOR SEALS
UNDERWATER
SOUND
Shapiro, Ari D.
Tougaard, Jakob
Jorgensen, Poul Boel
Kyhn, Line A.
Balle, Jeppe Dalgaard
Bernardez, Cristina
Fjalling, Arne
Karlsen, Junita
Wahlberg, Magnus
Transmission loss patterns from acoustic harassment and deterrent devices do not always follow geometrical spreading predictions
topic_facet acoustic harassment device (AHD)
acoustic deterrent device (ADD)
non-geometrical acoustic spreading
sound exposure level
multipath interference
marine mammal-fisheries
interactions
bycatch
TEMPORARY THRESHOLD SHIFT
WHALES PHYSETER-MACROCEPHALUS
PORPOISES PHOCOENA-PHOCOENA
BOTTLE-NOSED DOLPHINS
TURSIOPS-TRUNCATUS
BRITISH-COLUMBIA
FISHING NETS
HARBOR SEALS
UNDERWATER
SOUND
description Acoustic harassment and deterrent devices have become increasingly popular mitigation tools for negotiating the impacts of marine mammals on fisheries. The rationale for their variable effectiveness remains unexplained, but high variability in the surrounding acoustic field may be relevant. In the present study, the sound fields of one acoustic harassment device and three acoustic deterrent devices were measured at three study sites along the Scandinavian coast. Superimposed onto an overall trend of decreasing sound exposure levels with increasing range were large local variations in the sound level for all sources in each of the environments. This variability was likely caused by source directionality, inter-ping source level variation and multipath interference. Rapid and unpredictable variations in the sound level as a function of range deviated from expectations derived from spherical and cylindrical spreading models and conflicted with the classic concept of concentric zones of increasing disturbance with decreasing range. Under such conditions, animals may encounter difficulties when trying to determine the direction to and location of a sound source, which may complicate or jeopardize avoidance responses.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Shapiro, Ari D.
Tougaard, Jakob
Jorgensen, Poul Boel
Kyhn, Line A.
Balle, Jeppe Dalgaard
Bernardez, Cristina
Fjalling, Arne
Karlsen, Junita
Wahlberg, Magnus
author_facet Shapiro, Ari D.
Tougaard, Jakob
Jorgensen, Poul Boel
Kyhn, Line A.
Balle, Jeppe Dalgaard
Bernardez, Cristina
Fjalling, Arne
Karlsen, Junita
Wahlberg, Magnus
author_sort Shapiro, Ari D.
title Transmission loss patterns from acoustic harassment and deterrent devices do not always follow geometrical spreading predictions
title_short Transmission loss patterns from acoustic harassment and deterrent devices do not always follow geometrical spreading predictions
title_full Transmission loss patterns from acoustic harassment and deterrent devices do not always follow geometrical spreading predictions
title_fullStr Transmission loss patterns from acoustic harassment and deterrent devices do not always follow geometrical spreading predictions
title_full_unstemmed Transmission loss patterns from acoustic harassment and deterrent devices do not always follow geometrical spreading predictions
title_sort transmission loss patterns from acoustic harassment and deterrent devices do not always follow geometrical spreading predictions
publishDate 2009
url https://risweb.st-andrews.ac.uk/portal/en/researchoutput/transmission-loss-patterns-from-acoustic-harassment-and-deterrent-devices-do-not-always-follow-geometrical-spreading-predictions(cdd48178-c629-46d5-a02a-8165e03e2976).html
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2008.00243.x
genre Phocoena phocoena
Physeter macrocephalus
genre_facet Phocoena phocoena
Physeter macrocephalus
op_source Shapiro , A D , Tougaard , J , Jorgensen , P B , Kyhn , L A , Balle , J D , Bernardez , C , Fjalling , A , Karlsen , J & Wahlberg , M 2009 , ' Transmission loss patterns from acoustic harassment and deterrent devices do not always follow geometrical spreading predictions ' , Marine Mammal Science , vol. 25 , no. 1 , pp. 53-67 . https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2008.00243.x
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2008.00243.x
container_title Marine Mammal Science
container_volume 25
container_issue 1
container_start_page 53
op_container_end_page 67
_version_ 1766167979844698112