To ping or not to ping:the use of active acoustic devices in mitigating interactions between small cetaceans and gillnet fisheries

Active sound emitters (‘pingers’) are used in several gillnet fisheries to reduce bycatch of small cetaceans, and/or to reduce depredation by dolphins. Here, we review studies conducted to determine how effective these devices may be as management tools. Significant reductions in bycatch of harbour...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Endangered Species Research
Main Authors: Dawson, Steve, Northridge, Simon Patrick, Waples, Danielle, Read, Andrew
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://risweb.st-andrews.ac.uk/portal/en/researchoutput/to-ping-or-not-to-ping(bd73e339-714c-492c-bb34-4564718269e9).html
https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00464
https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/bitstream/10023/3394/1/Dawsonetal2013EndangeredSpRes019p201.pdf
id ftunstandrewcris:oai:risweb.st-andrews.ac.uk:publications/bd73e339-714c-492c-bb34-4564718269e9
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunstandrewcris:oai:risweb.st-andrews.ac.uk:publications/bd73e339-714c-492c-bb34-4564718269e9 2023-05-15T16:33:23+02:00 To ping or not to ping:the use of active acoustic devices in mitigating interactions between small cetaceans and gillnet fisheries Dawson, Steve Northridge, Simon Patrick Waples, Danielle Read, Andrew 2013 application/pdf https://risweb.st-andrews.ac.uk/portal/en/researchoutput/to-ping-or-not-to-ping(bd73e339-714c-492c-bb34-4564718269e9).html https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00464 https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/bitstream/10023/3394/1/Dawsonetal2013EndangeredSpRes019p201.pdf eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Dawson , S , Northridge , S P , Waples , D & Read , A 2013 , ' To ping or not to ping : the use of active acoustic devices in mitigating interactions between small cetaceans and gillnet fisheries ' , Endangered Species Research , vol. 19 , no. 3 , pp. 201-221 . https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00464 Gillnet Bycatch Dolphin Porpoise Pinger Acoustic devices article 2013 ftunstandrewcris https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00464 2022-06-02T07:41:35Z Active sound emitters (‘pingers’) are used in several gillnet fisheries to reduce bycatch of small cetaceans, and/or to reduce depredation by dolphins. Here, we review studies conducted to determine how effective these devices may be as management tools. Significant reductions in bycatch of harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena, franciscana Pontoporia blainvillei, common Delphinus delphis and striped dolphin Stenella coeruleoalba, and beaked whales as a group have been demonstrated. For harbour porpoise this result has been replicated in 14 controlled experiments in North America and Europe, and appears to be due to porpoises avoiding the area ensonified by pingers. Two gillnet fisheries (California-Oregon driftnet fishery for swordfish; New England groundfish fishery) with mandatory pinger use have been studied for over a decade. Bycatch rates of dolphins/porpoises have fallen by 50 to 60%, and there is no evidence of bycatch increasing over time due to habituation. In both fisheries, bycatch rates were significantly higher in nets sparsely equipped with pingers or in which pingers had failed, than in nets without any pingers at all. Studies of pinger use to reduce depredation by bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus generally show small and inconsistent improvements in fish catches and somewhat reduced net damage. Dolphin bycatch in these fisheries is rare, but still occurs in nets with pingers. Taken together, these studies suggest that the most promising candidates for bycatch reduction via pinger use will be gillnet fisheries in developed countries in which the bycaught cetaceans are generally neophobic species with large home ranges. We offer a set of lessons learned from the last decade of bycatch management. Article in Journal/Newspaper Harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena University of St Andrews: Research Portal Active Sound ENVELOPE(-56.167,-56.167,-63.417,-63.417) Endangered Species Research 19 3 201 221
institution Open Polar
collection University of St Andrews: Research Portal
op_collection_id ftunstandrewcris
language English
topic Gillnet
Bycatch
Dolphin
Porpoise
Pinger
Acoustic devices
spellingShingle Gillnet
Bycatch
Dolphin
Porpoise
Pinger
Acoustic devices
Dawson, Steve
Northridge, Simon Patrick
Waples, Danielle
Read, Andrew
To ping or not to ping:the use of active acoustic devices in mitigating interactions between small cetaceans and gillnet fisheries
topic_facet Gillnet
Bycatch
Dolphin
Porpoise
Pinger
Acoustic devices
description Active sound emitters (‘pingers’) are used in several gillnet fisheries to reduce bycatch of small cetaceans, and/or to reduce depredation by dolphins. Here, we review studies conducted to determine how effective these devices may be as management tools. Significant reductions in bycatch of harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena, franciscana Pontoporia blainvillei, common Delphinus delphis and striped dolphin Stenella coeruleoalba, and beaked whales as a group have been demonstrated. For harbour porpoise this result has been replicated in 14 controlled experiments in North America and Europe, and appears to be due to porpoises avoiding the area ensonified by pingers. Two gillnet fisheries (California-Oregon driftnet fishery for swordfish; New England groundfish fishery) with mandatory pinger use have been studied for over a decade. Bycatch rates of dolphins/porpoises have fallen by 50 to 60%, and there is no evidence of bycatch increasing over time due to habituation. In both fisheries, bycatch rates were significantly higher in nets sparsely equipped with pingers or in which pingers had failed, than in nets without any pingers at all. Studies of pinger use to reduce depredation by bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus generally show small and inconsistent improvements in fish catches and somewhat reduced net damage. Dolphin bycatch in these fisheries is rare, but still occurs in nets with pingers. Taken together, these studies suggest that the most promising candidates for bycatch reduction via pinger use will be gillnet fisheries in developed countries in which the bycaught cetaceans are generally neophobic species with large home ranges. We offer a set of lessons learned from the last decade of bycatch management.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Dawson, Steve
Northridge, Simon Patrick
Waples, Danielle
Read, Andrew
author_facet Dawson, Steve
Northridge, Simon Patrick
Waples, Danielle
Read, Andrew
author_sort Dawson, Steve
title To ping or not to ping:the use of active acoustic devices in mitigating interactions between small cetaceans and gillnet fisheries
title_short To ping or not to ping:the use of active acoustic devices in mitigating interactions between small cetaceans and gillnet fisheries
title_full To ping or not to ping:the use of active acoustic devices in mitigating interactions between small cetaceans and gillnet fisheries
title_fullStr To ping or not to ping:the use of active acoustic devices in mitigating interactions between small cetaceans and gillnet fisheries
title_full_unstemmed To ping or not to ping:the use of active acoustic devices in mitigating interactions between small cetaceans and gillnet fisheries
title_sort to ping or not to ping:the use of active acoustic devices in mitigating interactions between small cetaceans and gillnet fisheries
publishDate 2013
url https://risweb.st-andrews.ac.uk/portal/en/researchoutput/to-ping-or-not-to-ping(bd73e339-714c-492c-bb34-4564718269e9).html
https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00464
https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/bitstream/10023/3394/1/Dawsonetal2013EndangeredSpRes019p201.pdf
long_lat ENVELOPE(-56.167,-56.167,-63.417,-63.417)
geographic Active Sound
geographic_facet Active Sound
genre Harbour porpoise
Phocoena phocoena
genre_facet Harbour porpoise
Phocoena phocoena
op_source Dawson , S , Northridge , S P , Waples , D & Read , A 2013 , ' To ping or not to ping : the use of active acoustic devices in mitigating interactions between small cetaceans and gillnet fisheries ' , Endangered Species Research , vol. 19 , no. 3 , pp. 201-221 . https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00464
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00464
container_title Endangered Species Research
container_volume 19
container_issue 3
container_start_page 201
op_container_end_page 221
_version_ 1766023073180418048