Comparing methods suitable for monitoring marine mammals in low visibility conditions during seismic surveys

Loud sound emitted during offshore industrial activities can impact marine mammals. Regulations typically prescribe marine mammal monitoring before and/or during these activities to implement mitigation measures that minimise potential acoustic impacts. Using seismic surveys under low visibility con...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine Pollution Bulletin
Main Authors: Verfuss, Ursula K., Gillespie, Douglas, Gordon, Jonathan, Marques, Tiago A., Miller, Brianne, Plunkett, Rachael, Theriault, James A., Tollit, Dominic J., Zitterbart, Daniel P., Hubert, Philippe, Thomas, Len
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://risweb.st-andrews.ac.uk/portal/en/researchoutput/comparing-methods-suitable-for-monitoring-marine-mammals-in-low-visibility-conditions-during-seismic-surveys(6e015ec5-d0d3-43a5-9e66-4f288c65520f).html
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.10.034
https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/bitstream/10023/12898/1/Verfuss_2018_MPB_Lowvisibility_CC.pdf
id ftunstandrewcris:oai:risweb.st-andrews.ac.uk:publications/6e015ec5-d0d3-43a5-9e66-4f288c65520f
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunstandrewcris:oai:risweb.st-andrews.ac.uk:publications/6e015ec5-d0d3-43a5-9e66-4f288c65520f 2023-05-15T17:10:15+02:00 Comparing methods suitable for monitoring marine mammals in low visibility conditions during seismic surveys Verfuss, Ursula K. Gillespie, Douglas Gordon, Jonathan Marques, Tiago A. Miller, Brianne Plunkett, Rachael Theriault, James A. Tollit, Dominic J. Zitterbart, Daniel P. Hubert, Philippe Thomas, Len 2018-01 application/pdf https://risweb.st-andrews.ac.uk/portal/en/researchoutput/comparing-methods-suitable-for-monitoring-marine-mammals-in-low-visibility-conditions-during-seismic-surveys(6e015ec5-d0d3-43a5-9e66-4f288c65520f).html https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.10.034 https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/bitstream/10023/12898/1/Verfuss_2018_MPB_Lowvisibility_CC.pdf eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Verfuss , U K , Gillespie , D , Gordon , J , Marques , T A , Miller , B , Plunkett , R , Theriault , J A , Tollit , D J , Zitterbart , D P , Hubert , P & Thomas , L 2018 , ' Comparing methods suitable for monitoring marine mammals in low visibility conditions during seismic surveys ' , Marine Pollution Bulletin , vol. 126 , pp. 1-18 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.10.034 Marine mammals Monitoring methods Underwater noise Seismic survey Detection performance Low visibility article 2018 ftunstandrewcris https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.10.034 2021-12-26T14:31:56Z Loud sound emitted during offshore industrial activities can impact marine mammals. Regulations typically prescribe marine mammal monitoring before and/or during these activities to implement mitigation measures that minimise potential acoustic impacts. Using seismic surveys under low visibility conditions as a case study, we review which monitoring methods are suitable and compare their relative strengths and weaknesses. Passive acoustic monitoring has been implemented as either a complementary or alternative method to visual monitoring in low visibility conditions. Other methods such as RADAR, active sonar and thermal infrared have also been tested, but are rarely recommended by regulatory bodies. The efficiency of the monitoring method(s) will depend on the animal behaviour and environmental conditions, however, using a combination of complementary systems generally improves the overall detection performance. We recommend that the performance of monitoring systems, over a range of conditions, is explored in a modelling framework for a variety of species. Article in Journal/Newspaper Marine Mammal Monitoring University of St Andrews: Research Portal Marine Pollution Bulletin 126 1 18
institution Open Polar
collection University of St Andrews: Research Portal
op_collection_id ftunstandrewcris
language English
topic Marine mammals
Monitoring methods
Underwater noise
Seismic survey
Detection performance
Low visibility
spellingShingle Marine mammals
Monitoring methods
Underwater noise
Seismic survey
Detection performance
Low visibility
Verfuss, Ursula K.
Gillespie, Douglas
Gordon, Jonathan
Marques, Tiago A.
Miller, Brianne
Plunkett, Rachael
Theriault, James A.
Tollit, Dominic J.
Zitterbart, Daniel P.
Hubert, Philippe
Thomas, Len
Comparing methods suitable for monitoring marine mammals in low visibility conditions during seismic surveys
topic_facet Marine mammals
Monitoring methods
Underwater noise
Seismic survey
Detection performance
Low visibility
description Loud sound emitted during offshore industrial activities can impact marine mammals. Regulations typically prescribe marine mammal monitoring before and/or during these activities to implement mitigation measures that minimise potential acoustic impacts. Using seismic surveys under low visibility conditions as a case study, we review which monitoring methods are suitable and compare their relative strengths and weaknesses. Passive acoustic monitoring has been implemented as either a complementary or alternative method to visual monitoring in low visibility conditions. Other methods such as RADAR, active sonar and thermal infrared have also been tested, but are rarely recommended by regulatory bodies. The efficiency of the monitoring method(s) will depend on the animal behaviour and environmental conditions, however, using a combination of complementary systems generally improves the overall detection performance. We recommend that the performance of monitoring systems, over a range of conditions, is explored in a modelling framework for a variety of species.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Verfuss, Ursula K.
Gillespie, Douglas
Gordon, Jonathan
Marques, Tiago A.
Miller, Brianne
Plunkett, Rachael
Theriault, James A.
Tollit, Dominic J.
Zitterbart, Daniel P.
Hubert, Philippe
Thomas, Len
author_facet Verfuss, Ursula K.
Gillespie, Douglas
Gordon, Jonathan
Marques, Tiago A.
Miller, Brianne
Plunkett, Rachael
Theriault, James A.
Tollit, Dominic J.
Zitterbart, Daniel P.
Hubert, Philippe
Thomas, Len
author_sort Verfuss, Ursula K.
title Comparing methods suitable for monitoring marine mammals in low visibility conditions during seismic surveys
title_short Comparing methods suitable for monitoring marine mammals in low visibility conditions during seismic surveys
title_full Comparing methods suitable for monitoring marine mammals in low visibility conditions during seismic surveys
title_fullStr Comparing methods suitable for monitoring marine mammals in low visibility conditions during seismic surveys
title_full_unstemmed Comparing methods suitable for monitoring marine mammals in low visibility conditions during seismic surveys
title_sort comparing methods suitable for monitoring marine mammals in low visibility conditions during seismic surveys
publishDate 2018
url https://risweb.st-andrews.ac.uk/portal/en/researchoutput/comparing-methods-suitable-for-monitoring-marine-mammals-in-low-visibility-conditions-during-seismic-surveys(6e015ec5-d0d3-43a5-9e66-4f288c65520f).html
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.10.034
https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/bitstream/10023/12898/1/Verfuss_2018_MPB_Lowvisibility_CC.pdf
genre Marine Mammal Monitoring
genre_facet Marine Mammal Monitoring
op_source Verfuss , U K , Gillespie , D , Gordon , J , Marques , T A , Miller , B , Plunkett , R , Theriault , J A , Tollit , D J , Zitterbart , D P , Hubert , P & Thomas , L 2018 , ' Comparing methods suitable for monitoring marine mammals in low visibility conditions during seismic surveys ' , Marine Pollution Bulletin , vol. 126 , pp. 1-18 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.10.034
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.10.034
container_title Marine Pollution Bulletin
container_volume 126
container_start_page 1
op_container_end_page 18
_version_ 1766066827022041088