Identification of Southern Ocean acoustic targets using aggregation backscatter and shape characteristics

• Published in: ICES Journal of Marine Science
• Main Authors: Woodd-Walker, RS, Watkins, JL, Brierley, Andrew Stuart
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: 2003
• Subjects: acoustics; artificial neural network; Euphausia superba; krill; linear discriminant analysis; South Georgia; Southern Ocean; zooplankton; ANTARCTIC KRILL; FISH SCHOOLS; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; BIOLOGICAL PATCHINESS; CLASSIFICATION; ABUNDANCE; GEORGIA; EDGE; ATLANTIC; NETWORKS; Antarctic; Antarc*; Antarctic Krill
• Online Access: https://risweb.st-andrews.ac.uk/portal/en/researchoutput/identification-of-southern-ocean-acoustic-targets-using-aggregation-backscatter-and-shape-characteristics(05ffb027-cac6-4016-9d47-1f8c2a568190).html; https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-3139(03)00062-6; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038538500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

Acoustic surveys for biomass estimation require accurate identification of echoes from the target species. In one objective technique for identifying Antarctic krill, the difference between mean volume-backscattering strength at two frequencies is used, but can misclassify small krill and other plankton. Here, we investigate ways to improve target identification by including characteristics of backscattering energy and morphology of aggregations. To do this, multi-frequency acoustic data were collected concurrently with target fishing of Antarctic krill and other euphausiid and salp aggregations. Parameter sets for these known aggregations were collated and used to develop empirical classifications. Both linear discriminant-function analysis (DFA) and the artificial neural network technique were employed. In both cases, acoustic-backscattering energy parameters were most important for discriminating between Antarctic krill and other zooplankton. However, swarm morphology and other parameters improved the discrimination, particularly between krill and salps. Our study suggests that for krill-biomass estimates, a simple DFA based on acoustic-energy parameters is a substantial improvement over current dB-difference acoustic methods; but studies requiring the discrimination of zooplankton other than krill must still be supported by target fishing. (C) 2003 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.