Nutrient intake and its possible drivers in free-ranging European brown bears (Ursus arctos arctos)

• Main Authors: De Cuyper, Annelies, Strubbe, Diederik, Clauss, Marcus, Lens, Luc, Zedrosser, Andreas, Steyaert, Sam, Verbist, Leen, Janssens, Geert P J
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley Open Access 2023
• Subjects: Department of Small Animals; 570 Life sciences; biology; 630 Agriculture; Ursus arctos
• Online Access: https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/233995/; https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/233995/1/EcolEvol_brown_bear_diets_2023.pdf; https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-233995; https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10156

The dietary nutrient profile has metabolic significance and possibly contributes to species' foraging behavior. The brown bear (Ursus arctos) was used as a model species for which dietary ingredient and nutrient concentrations as well as nutrient ratios were determined annually, seasonally and per reproductive class. Brown bears had a vertebrate-and-ant-dominated diet in spring and early summer and a berry-dominated diet in fall, which translated into protein-rich and carbohydrate-rich diets, respectively. Fiber concentrations appeared constant over time and averaged at 25% of dry matter intake. Dietary ingredient proportions differed between reproductive classes; however, these differences did not translate into a difference in dietary nutrient concentrations, suggesting that bears manage to maintain similar nutrient profiles with selection of different ingredients. In terms of nutrient ratios, the dietary protein to non-protein ratio, considered optimal at around 0.2 (on metabolizable energy basis), averaged around 0.2 in this study in fall and around 0.8 in spring and summer. We introduced the minimal non-fat to fat ratio necessary for efficient maintenance metabolism. This ratio varied across seasons but never fell beneath the theoretically estimated minimum to ensure metabolic efficiency. This population thus managed to ingest diets that never exerted a lack of glucogenic substrate, suggesting that metabolic efficiency may either be a driver of active diet selection or that natural resources available to bears did not constitute a constraint in this respect. Given the considerable proportion of fiber in the diet of brown bears, the relevance of this nutrient and its role in foraging behavior might be underestimated.