Phase-resolved wave prediction with varying buoy positions in the field using machine learning-based methods

Surface wave predictions for several wave periods in advance are crucial for optimizing a wide range of offshore applications. This work focuses on the potential application in active control of wave energy converters (WECs), which can dramatically enhance the efficiency of power generation. Field t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ocean Engineering
Main Authors: Chen, Jialun, Hlophe, Thobani, Gunawan, David, Taylor, Paul H., Milne, Ian A., Zhao, Wenhua
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Research Online 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ro.uow.edu.au/test2021/11621
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118107
id ftunivwollongong:oai:ro.uow.edu.au:test2021-17168
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivwollongong:oai:ro.uow.edu.au:test2021-17168 2024-09-09T20:10:04+00:00 Phase-resolved wave prediction with varying buoy positions in the field using machine learning-based methods Chen, Jialun Hlophe, Thobani Gunawan, David Taylor, Paul H. Milne, Ian A. Zhao, Wenhua 2024-09-01T07:00:00Z https://ro.uow.edu.au/test2021/11621 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118107 unknown Research Online https://ro.uow.edu.au/test2021/11621 doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118107 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118107 Scopus Harvesting Series Artificial intelligence Directional spreading Machine learning Wave buoys Wave prediction text 2024 ftunivwollongong https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118107 2024-06-18T23:54:46Z Surface wave predictions for several wave periods in advance are crucial for optimizing a wide range of offshore applications. This work focuses on the potential application in active control of wave energy converters (WECs), which can dramatically enhance the efficiency of power generation. Field tests were conducted in the Southern Ocean of Albany, Western Australia. We compared two prediction models: a physics-based algebraic model and a machine learning-based Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model. Although the standard ANN model is found to achieve better prediction accuracy than the algebraic model for highly directional spreading waves, the prediction performance of the model is greatly reduced due to varying buoy positions, leading to phase offset in predictions. To overcome this limitation, phase correction and partition methods have been incorporated with physical insights into a purely data-driven ANN model. The modified ANN model significantly reduced the prediction error in peaks and troughs compared to the standard ANN model. This study demonstrates that both physics-based and machine learning-based models can work in parallel to provide more accurate predictions, thereby enhancing the practical value of wave prediction for WECs. Text Southern Ocean University of Wollongong, Australia: Research Online Southern Ocean Ocean Engineering 307 118107
institution Open Polar
collection University of Wollongong, Australia: Research Online
op_collection_id ftunivwollongong
language unknown
topic Artificial intelligence
Directional spreading
Machine learning
Wave buoys
Wave prediction
spellingShingle Artificial intelligence
Directional spreading
Machine learning
Wave buoys
Wave prediction
Chen, Jialun
Hlophe, Thobani
Gunawan, David
Taylor, Paul H.
Milne, Ian A.
Zhao, Wenhua
Phase-resolved wave prediction with varying buoy positions in the field using machine learning-based methods
topic_facet Artificial intelligence
Directional spreading
Machine learning
Wave buoys
Wave prediction
description Surface wave predictions for several wave periods in advance are crucial for optimizing a wide range of offshore applications. This work focuses on the potential application in active control of wave energy converters (WECs), which can dramatically enhance the efficiency of power generation. Field tests were conducted in the Southern Ocean of Albany, Western Australia. We compared two prediction models: a physics-based algebraic model and a machine learning-based Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model. Although the standard ANN model is found to achieve better prediction accuracy than the algebraic model for highly directional spreading waves, the prediction performance of the model is greatly reduced due to varying buoy positions, leading to phase offset in predictions. To overcome this limitation, phase correction and partition methods have been incorporated with physical insights into a purely data-driven ANN model. The modified ANN model significantly reduced the prediction error in peaks and troughs compared to the standard ANN model. This study demonstrates that both physics-based and machine learning-based models can work in parallel to provide more accurate predictions, thereby enhancing the practical value of wave prediction for WECs.
format Text
author Chen, Jialun
Hlophe, Thobani
Gunawan, David
Taylor, Paul H.
Milne, Ian A.
Zhao, Wenhua
author_facet Chen, Jialun
Hlophe, Thobani
Gunawan, David
Taylor, Paul H.
Milne, Ian A.
Zhao, Wenhua
author_sort Chen, Jialun
title Phase-resolved wave prediction with varying buoy positions in the field using machine learning-based methods
title_short Phase-resolved wave prediction with varying buoy positions in the field using machine learning-based methods
title_full Phase-resolved wave prediction with varying buoy positions in the field using machine learning-based methods
title_fullStr Phase-resolved wave prediction with varying buoy positions in the field using machine learning-based methods
title_full_unstemmed Phase-resolved wave prediction with varying buoy positions in the field using machine learning-based methods
title_sort phase-resolved wave prediction with varying buoy positions in the field using machine learning-based methods
publisher Research Online
publishDate 2024
url https://ro.uow.edu.au/test2021/11621
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118107
geographic Southern Ocean
geographic_facet Southern Ocean
genre Southern Ocean
genre_facet Southern Ocean
op_source Scopus Harvesting Series
op_relation https://ro.uow.edu.au/test2021/11621
doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118107
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118107
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118107
container_title Ocean Engineering
container_volume 307
container_start_page 118107
_version_ 1809944410349109248