Having a real say: findings from first nations community panels on pandemic influenza vaccine distribution

Background: Recent deliberations by Australian public health researchers and practitioners produced an ethical framework of how decisions should be made to distribute pandemic influenza vaccine. The outcome of the deliberations was that the population should be considered in two categories, Level 1...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC Public Health
Main Authors: Crooks, Kristy, Taylor, Kylie, Burns, Kiara, Campbell, Sandy, Degeling, Chris, Williams, Jane, Andrews, Ross, Massey, Peter, McVernon, Jodie, Miller, Adrian
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Research Online 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ro.uow.edu.au/test2021/10301
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17262-7
id ftunivwollongong:oai:ro.uow.edu.au:test2021-15848
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivwollongong:oai:ro.uow.edu.au:test2021-15848 2024-02-11T10:03:49+01:00 Having a real say: findings from first nations community panels on pandemic influenza vaccine distribution Crooks, Kristy Taylor, Kylie Burns, Kiara Campbell, Sandy Degeling, Chris Williams, Jane Andrews, Ross Massey, Peter McVernon, Jodie Miller, Adrian 2023-12-01T08:00:00Z https://ro.uow.edu.au/test2021/10301 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17262-7 unknown Research Online https://ro.uow.edu.au/test2021/10301 doi:10.1186/s12889-023-17262-7 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17262-7 Scopus Harvesting Series First Nations Governance Pandemic Influenza vaccination Public deliberation Public health policy text 2023 ftunivwollongong https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17262-7 2024-01-15T23:25:23Z Background: Recent deliberations by Australian public health researchers and practitioners produced an ethical framework of how decisions should be made to distribute pandemic influenza vaccine. The outcome of the deliberations was that the population should be considered in two categories, Level 1 and Level 2, with Level 1 groups being offered access to the pandemic influenza vaccine before other groups. However, the public health researchers and practitioners recognised the importance of making space for public opinion and sought to understand citizens values and preferences, especially First Nations peoples. Methods: We conducted First Nations Community Panels in two Australian locations in 2019 to assess First Nations people’s informed views through a deliberative process on pandemic influenza vaccination distribution strategies. Panels were asked to make decisions on priority levels, coverage and vaccine doses. Results: Two panels were conducted with eighteen First Nations participants from a range of ages who were purposively recruited through local community networks. Panels heard presentations from public health experts, cross-examined expert presenters and deliberated on the issues. Both panels agreed that First Nations peoples be assigned Level 1 priority, be offered pandemic influenza vaccination before other groups, and be offered two doses of vaccine. Reasons for this decision included First Nations people’s lives, culture and families are important; are at-risk of severe health outcomes; and experience barriers and challenges to accessing safe, quality and culturally appropriate healthcare. We found that communication strategies, utilising and upskilling the First Nations health workforce, and targeted vaccination strategies are important elements in pandemic preparedness and response with First Nations peoples. Conclusions: First Nations Community Panels supported prioritising First Nations peoples for pandemic influenza vaccination distribution and offering greater protection by using a two-dose ... Text First Nations University of Wollongong, Australia: Research Online BMC Public Health 23 1
institution Open Polar
collection University of Wollongong, Australia: Research Online
op_collection_id ftunivwollongong
language unknown
topic First Nations
Governance
Pandemic Influenza vaccination
Public deliberation
Public health policy
spellingShingle First Nations
Governance
Pandemic Influenza vaccination
Public deliberation
Public health policy
Crooks, Kristy
Taylor, Kylie
Burns, Kiara
Campbell, Sandy
Degeling, Chris
Williams, Jane
Andrews, Ross
Massey, Peter
McVernon, Jodie
Miller, Adrian
Having a real say: findings from first nations community panels on pandemic influenza vaccine distribution
topic_facet First Nations
Governance
Pandemic Influenza vaccination
Public deliberation
Public health policy
description Background: Recent deliberations by Australian public health researchers and practitioners produced an ethical framework of how decisions should be made to distribute pandemic influenza vaccine. The outcome of the deliberations was that the population should be considered in two categories, Level 1 and Level 2, with Level 1 groups being offered access to the pandemic influenza vaccine before other groups. However, the public health researchers and practitioners recognised the importance of making space for public opinion and sought to understand citizens values and preferences, especially First Nations peoples. Methods: We conducted First Nations Community Panels in two Australian locations in 2019 to assess First Nations people’s informed views through a deliberative process on pandemic influenza vaccination distribution strategies. Panels were asked to make decisions on priority levels, coverage and vaccine doses. Results: Two panels were conducted with eighteen First Nations participants from a range of ages who were purposively recruited through local community networks. Panels heard presentations from public health experts, cross-examined expert presenters and deliberated on the issues. Both panels agreed that First Nations peoples be assigned Level 1 priority, be offered pandemic influenza vaccination before other groups, and be offered two doses of vaccine. Reasons for this decision included First Nations people’s lives, culture and families are important; are at-risk of severe health outcomes; and experience barriers and challenges to accessing safe, quality and culturally appropriate healthcare. We found that communication strategies, utilising and upskilling the First Nations health workforce, and targeted vaccination strategies are important elements in pandemic preparedness and response with First Nations peoples. Conclusions: First Nations Community Panels supported prioritising First Nations peoples for pandemic influenza vaccination distribution and offering greater protection by using a two-dose ...
format Text
author Crooks, Kristy
Taylor, Kylie
Burns, Kiara
Campbell, Sandy
Degeling, Chris
Williams, Jane
Andrews, Ross
Massey, Peter
McVernon, Jodie
Miller, Adrian
author_facet Crooks, Kristy
Taylor, Kylie
Burns, Kiara
Campbell, Sandy
Degeling, Chris
Williams, Jane
Andrews, Ross
Massey, Peter
McVernon, Jodie
Miller, Adrian
author_sort Crooks, Kristy
title Having a real say: findings from first nations community panels on pandemic influenza vaccine distribution
title_short Having a real say: findings from first nations community panels on pandemic influenza vaccine distribution
title_full Having a real say: findings from first nations community panels on pandemic influenza vaccine distribution
title_fullStr Having a real say: findings from first nations community panels on pandemic influenza vaccine distribution
title_full_unstemmed Having a real say: findings from first nations community panels on pandemic influenza vaccine distribution
title_sort having a real say: findings from first nations community panels on pandemic influenza vaccine distribution
publisher Research Online
publishDate 2023
url https://ro.uow.edu.au/test2021/10301
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17262-7
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_source Scopus Harvesting Series
op_relation https://ro.uow.edu.au/test2021/10301
doi:10.1186/s12889-023-17262-7
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17262-7
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17262-7
container_title BMC Public Health
container_volume 23
container_issue 1
_version_ 1790600144962453504