Monitoring, control and surveillance of protected areas and specially managed areas in the marine domain

A checklist is provided for monitoring, control and surveillance (MCS) actions to be applied in the areal-based management of marine fisheries and attached biodiversity conservation needs. The application of MCS to underpin compliance enforcement in marine protected and specially managed areas is se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Miller, Denzil G, Slicer, N, Hanich, Quentin A
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Research Online 2013
Subjects:
Law
Online Access:https://ro.uow.edu.au/lawpapers/722
id ftunivwollongong:oai:ro.uow.edu.au:lawpapers-1735
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivwollongong:oai:ro.uow.edu.au:lawpapers-1735 2023-05-15T13:58:42+02:00 Monitoring, control and surveillance of protected areas and specially managed areas in the marine domain Miller, Denzil G Slicer, N Hanich, Quentin A 2013-01-01T08:00:00Z https://ro.uow.edu.au/lawpapers/722 unknown Research Online https://ro.uow.edu.au/lawpapers/722 Faculty of Law - Papers (Archive) managed marine domain specially areas monitoring protected surveillance control Law article 2013 ftunivwollongong 2020-02-25T11:36:00Z A checklist is provided for monitoring, control and surveillance (MCS) actions to be applied in the areal-based management of marine fisheries and attached biodiversity conservation needs. The application of MCS to underpin compliance enforcement in marine protected and specially managed areas is seen as important in addressing such needs. Spatial, temporal, management and practical considerations are identified as important implementing considerations for effective MCS-based compliance enforcement. Most notably, human activity impact mitigation appears to possess the greatest potential to reduce potentially-harmful and cumulative long-term effects across all relevant spatial-temporal ranges considered. Equally, selection of suitable MCS approaches requires careful consideration of spatial and/or temporal constraints, as well as regulatory requirements. Express reference is therefore made to conservation measures adopted by the Commission of the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) as examples of where specific, areal-based, precautionary, ecosystem-directed and operational MCS measures have been applied. It is concluded that customary MCS measures are suitable for both fisheries management and biodiversity conservation in protected, or specially managed, areas. The importance of cost-benefit considerations, management feedback and information review is also discussed in the context of minimising protected-area MCS costs. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic University of Wollongong, Australia: Research Online Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection University of Wollongong, Australia: Research Online
op_collection_id ftunivwollongong
language unknown
topic managed
marine
domain
specially
areas
monitoring
protected
surveillance
control
Law
spellingShingle managed
marine
domain
specially
areas
monitoring
protected
surveillance
control
Law
Miller, Denzil G
Slicer, N
Hanich, Quentin A
Monitoring, control and surveillance of protected areas and specially managed areas in the marine domain
topic_facet managed
marine
domain
specially
areas
monitoring
protected
surveillance
control
Law
description A checklist is provided for monitoring, control and surveillance (MCS) actions to be applied in the areal-based management of marine fisheries and attached biodiversity conservation needs. The application of MCS to underpin compliance enforcement in marine protected and specially managed areas is seen as important in addressing such needs. Spatial, temporal, management and practical considerations are identified as important implementing considerations for effective MCS-based compliance enforcement. Most notably, human activity impact mitigation appears to possess the greatest potential to reduce potentially-harmful and cumulative long-term effects across all relevant spatial-temporal ranges considered. Equally, selection of suitable MCS approaches requires careful consideration of spatial and/or temporal constraints, as well as regulatory requirements. Express reference is therefore made to conservation measures adopted by the Commission of the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) as examples of where specific, areal-based, precautionary, ecosystem-directed and operational MCS measures have been applied. It is concluded that customary MCS measures are suitable for both fisheries management and biodiversity conservation in protected, or specially managed, areas. The importance of cost-benefit considerations, management feedback and information review is also discussed in the context of minimising protected-area MCS costs.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Miller, Denzil G
Slicer, N
Hanich, Quentin A
author_facet Miller, Denzil G
Slicer, N
Hanich, Quentin A
author_sort Miller, Denzil G
title Monitoring, control and surveillance of protected areas and specially managed areas in the marine domain
title_short Monitoring, control and surveillance of protected areas and specially managed areas in the marine domain
title_full Monitoring, control and surveillance of protected areas and specially managed areas in the marine domain
title_fullStr Monitoring, control and surveillance of protected areas and specially managed areas in the marine domain
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring, control and surveillance of protected areas and specially managed areas in the marine domain
title_sort monitoring, control and surveillance of protected areas and specially managed areas in the marine domain
publisher Research Online
publishDate 2013
url https://ro.uow.edu.au/lawpapers/722
geographic Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
op_source Faculty of Law - Papers (Archive)
op_relation https://ro.uow.edu.au/lawpapers/722
_version_ 1766267053064323072