The United States of America: an imperial manifestation? a study of the strengths and weaknesses of empire theory

Research Report submitted in the obtainment of a Masters in International Relations. UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND Johannesburg, South Africa 28 May 2015 This research sets to understand the intricacies of modern Empire and in particular the United States of America as the central agent of neolibe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bonvalot-Noirot, Emma
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10539/18318
id ftunivwitwaters:oai:wiredspace.wits.ac.za:10539/18318
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivwitwaters:oai:wiredspace.wits.ac.za:10539/18318 2023-06-11T04:15:01+02:00 The United States of America: an imperial manifestation? a study of the strengths and weaknesses of empire theory Bonvalot-Noirot, Emma 2015-08-25 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10539/18318 en eng http://hdl.handle.net/10539/18318 Neoliberalism| United States of America Authoritarianism Politics and government Thesis 2015 ftunivwitwaters 2023-05-15T09:52:20Z Research Report submitted in the obtainment of a Masters in International Relations. UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND Johannesburg, South Africa 28 May 2015 This research sets to understand the intricacies of modern Empire and in particular the United States of America as the central agent of neoliberal imperialism. This is done with the objective of assessing the accuracy of Empire theory as an international relations tool of analysis. Empire theory has gained rising academic attention since the early 2000s, this research sought to assess its place and use when analysing the United States as Empire. In particular, the study focused on Leo Panitch and Sam Gindin’s version of informal Empire and Empire by invitation. These notions were understood in the relations existing between the United States and its client states, Mexico and South Korea, via the medium of international financial institutions and trade agreements, namely the International Monetary Fund and the North Atlantic Free Trade Agreement. Mexico and South Korea were clearly described as neoliberal states operating within Empire. Yet, this study sought to challenge the concept and the theory of Empire by investigating these client states’ political voices. Their agenda-setting abilities were analysed within the G20 context, thanks to its rotational presidency within the forum. The researcher sought to uncover whether Mexico and South Korea had the ability to shape discussions and break away from the neoliberal discourse, and therefore Empire. The findings were of mixed results as it was established that while Mexico steps further away than South Korea from neoliberal perspectives, both client states still formulate their policies within a neoliberal framework, as the United States does not oppose or contest their agendas. While a fundamental conclusion was not reached, it was settled that Empire theory is still accurate in describing inter-capitalist state relations however it does not analytically grasp the rising opportunities existing for states, ... Thesis North Atlantic University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg: WITS Institutional Repository on DSpace (WIReDSpace)
institution Open Polar
collection University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg: WITS Institutional Repository on DSpace (WIReDSpace)
op_collection_id ftunivwitwaters
language English
topic Neoliberalism|
United States of America
Authoritarianism
Politics and government
spellingShingle Neoliberalism|
United States of America
Authoritarianism
Politics and government
Bonvalot-Noirot, Emma
The United States of America: an imperial manifestation? a study of the strengths and weaknesses of empire theory
topic_facet Neoliberalism|
United States of America
Authoritarianism
Politics and government
description Research Report submitted in the obtainment of a Masters in International Relations. UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND Johannesburg, South Africa 28 May 2015 This research sets to understand the intricacies of modern Empire and in particular the United States of America as the central agent of neoliberal imperialism. This is done with the objective of assessing the accuracy of Empire theory as an international relations tool of analysis. Empire theory has gained rising academic attention since the early 2000s, this research sought to assess its place and use when analysing the United States as Empire. In particular, the study focused on Leo Panitch and Sam Gindin’s version of informal Empire and Empire by invitation. These notions were understood in the relations existing between the United States and its client states, Mexico and South Korea, via the medium of international financial institutions and trade agreements, namely the International Monetary Fund and the North Atlantic Free Trade Agreement. Mexico and South Korea were clearly described as neoliberal states operating within Empire. Yet, this study sought to challenge the concept and the theory of Empire by investigating these client states’ political voices. Their agenda-setting abilities were analysed within the G20 context, thanks to its rotational presidency within the forum. The researcher sought to uncover whether Mexico and South Korea had the ability to shape discussions and break away from the neoliberal discourse, and therefore Empire. The findings were of mixed results as it was established that while Mexico steps further away than South Korea from neoliberal perspectives, both client states still formulate their policies within a neoliberal framework, as the United States does not oppose or contest their agendas. While a fundamental conclusion was not reached, it was settled that Empire theory is still accurate in describing inter-capitalist state relations however it does not analytically grasp the rising opportunities existing for states, ...
format Thesis
author Bonvalot-Noirot, Emma
author_facet Bonvalot-Noirot, Emma
author_sort Bonvalot-Noirot, Emma
title The United States of America: an imperial manifestation? a study of the strengths and weaknesses of empire theory
title_short The United States of America: an imperial manifestation? a study of the strengths and weaknesses of empire theory
title_full The United States of America: an imperial manifestation? a study of the strengths and weaknesses of empire theory
title_fullStr The United States of America: an imperial manifestation? a study of the strengths and weaknesses of empire theory
title_full_unstemmed The United States of America: an imperial manifestation? a study of the strengths and weaknesses of empire theory
title_sort united states of america: an imperial manifestation? a study of the strengths and weaknesses of empire theory
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/10539/18318
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/10539/18318
_version_ 1768371497807642624