Why do organochlorine differences between arctic regions vary among trophic levels?

Statistical analysis of organochlorine contaminants (OCs) in marine mammals has shown that, for most OCs, the European Arctic is more contaminated than the Canadian and U.S. Arctic. Recently, comparison of OC concentration ranges in seabirds, arctic cod (Boregadus saida), and zooplankton, found no d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental Science & Technology
Main Authors: Borgå, Katrine, Gabrielsen, Geir Wing, Skaare, Janneche Utne, Kleivane, Lars, Norstrom, Ross J., Fisk, Aaron T.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Scholarship at UWindsor 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/glierpub/432
https://doi.org/10.1021/es0481124
id ftunivwindsor:oai:scholar.uwindsor.ca:glierpub-1434
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivwindsor:oai:scholar.uwindsor.ca:glierpub-1434 2023-06-11T04:07:58+02:00 Why do organochlorine differences between arctic regions vary among trophic levels? Borgå, Katrine Gabrielsen, Geir Wing Skaare, Janneche Utne Kleivane, Lars Norstrom, Ross J. Fisk, Aaron T. 2005-06-15T07:00:00Z https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/glierpub/432 https://doi.org/10.1021/es0481124 unknown Scholarship at UWindsor https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/glierpub/432 doi:10.1021/es0481124 https://doi.org/10.1021/es0481124 Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research Publications text 2005 ftunivwindsor https://doi.org/10.1021/es0481124 2023-05-06T19:10:57Z Statistical analysis of organochlorine contaminants (OCs) in marine mammals has shown that, for most OCs, the European Arctic is more contaminated than the Canadian and U.S. Arctic. Recently, comparison of OC concentration ranges in seabirds, arctic cod (Boregadus saida), and zooplankton, found no difference between these regions. To address these inconsistencies, marine food web OC data from the European (central Barents Sea (CBS)) and Canadian Arctic (Northwater Polynya (NOW)) were simultaneously statistically analyzed. In general, concentrations of OCs were greater in seabirds and ringed seals (Phoca hispida) from the CBS as compared to the NOW; consistent with circumpolar trends observed in marine mammals. In contrast, levels of OCs were generally similar in zooplankton and arctic cod between the CBS and NOW. The main exception is HCH which had greater levels in the NOW across all trophic levels because of the greater proximity to sources in eastern Asia. The lack of differences in OC concentrations in zooplankton and Arctic cod from the European and Canadian Arctic suggest that regional differences in OC contamination in the Arctic have evened out. Reduced regional differences were not observed in marine mammals or seabirds because they are long-lived and also acquire contaminants from maternal transfer and hence reflect levels from the past when the European Arctic was more contaminated than the Canadian Arctic. In addition, seabirds may reflect exposure from other areas. This study highlights the potential problem of comparing spatial trends by using means and confidence intervals as compared to simultaneous statistical analysis of raw data. Differences in the spatial trends of OCs between trophic levels in the Arctic are important for consideration when assessing regional differences in spatial and temporal trends of discontinued and current-use contaminants. © 2005 American Chemical Society. Text Arctic cod Arctic Barents Sea Phoca hispida Zooplankton University of Windsor, Ontario: Scholarship at UWindsor Arctic Barents Sea Environmental Science & Technology 39 12 4343 4352
institution Open Polar
collection University of Windsor, Ontario: Scholarship at UWindsor
op_collection_id ftunivwindsor
language unknown
description Statistical analysis of organochlorine contaminants (OCs) in marine mammals has shown that, for most OCs, the European Arctic is more contaminated than the Canadian and U.S. Arctic. Recently, comparison of OC concentration ranges in seabirds, arctic cod (Boregadus saida), and zooplankton, found no difference between these regions. To address these inconsistencies, marine food web OC data from the European (central Barents Sea (CBS)) and Canadian Arctic (Northwater Polynya (NOW)) were simultaneously statistically analyzed. In general, concentrations of OCs were greater in seabirds and ringed seals (Phoca hispida) from the CBS as compared to the NOW; consistent with circumpolar trends observed in marine mammals. In contrast, levels of OCs were generally similar in zooplankton and arctic cod between the CBS and NOW. The main exception is HCH which had greater levels in the NOW across all trophic levels because of the greater proximity to sources in eastern Asia. The lack of differences in OC concentrations in zooplankton and Arctic cod from the European and Canadian Arctic suggest that regional differences in OC contamination in the Arctic have evened out. Reduced regional differences were not observed in marine mammals or seabirds because they are long-lived and also acquire contaminants from maternal transfer and hence reflect levels from the past when the European Arctic was more contaminated than the Canadian Arctic. In addition, seabirds may reflect exposure from other areas. This study highlights the potential problem of comparing spatial trends by using means and confidence intervals as compared to simultaneous statistical analysis of raw data. Differences in the spatial trends of OCs between trophic levels in the Arctic are important for consideration when assessing regional differences in spatial and temporal trends of discontinued and current-use contaminants. © 2005 American Chemical Society.
format Text
author Borgå, Katrine
Gabrielsen, Geir Wing
Skaare, Janneche Utne
Kleivane, Lars
Norstrom, Ross J.
Fisk, Aaron T.
spellingShingle Borgå, Katrine
Gabrielsen, Geir Wing
Skaare, Janneche Utne
Kleivane, Lars
Norstrom, Ross J.
Fisk, Aaron T.
Why do organochlorine differences between arctic regions vary among trophic levels?
author_facet Borgå, Katrine
Gabrielsen, Geir Wing
Skaare, Janneche Utne
Kleivane, Lars
Norstrom, Ross J.
Fisk, Aaron T.
author_sort Borgå, Katrine
title Why do organochlorine differences between arctic regions vary among trophic levels?
title_short Why do organochlorine differences between arctic regions vary among trophic levels?
title_full Why do organochlorine differences between arctic regions vary among trophic levels?
title_fullStr Why do organochlorine differences between arctic regions vary among trophic levels?
title_full_unstemmed Why do organochlorine differences between arctic regions vary among trophic levels?
title_sort why do organochlorine differences between arctic regions vary among trophic levels?
publisher Scholarship at UWindsor
publishDate 2005
url https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/glierpub/432
https://doi.org/10.1021/es0481124
geographic Arctic
Barents Sea
geographic_facet Arctic
Barents Sea
genre Arctic cod
Arctic
Barents Sea
Phoca hispida
Zooplankton
genre_facet Arctic cod
Arctic
Barents Sea
Phoca hispida
Zooplankton
op_source Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research Publications
op_relation https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/glierpub/432
doi:10.1021/es0481124
https://doi.org/10.1021/es0481124
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1021/es0481124
container_title Environmental Science & Technology
container_volume 39
container_issue 12
container_start_page 4343
op_container_end_page 4352
_version_ 1768381068628459520