Evaluating Arctic State Implementation of Ecosystem-Based Management Recommendations Supported by the Arctic Council: Canada, Norway, and the US
Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2014 The Arctic is a dynamic environment with growing global attention stimulated by a changing climate. Because the Arctic Ocean remains a common pool resource, the need for an ecosystem approach to oceans management (EBM) is widely acknowledged on...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1773/26900 |
id |
ftunivwashington:oai:digital.lib.washington.edu:1773/26900 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftunivwashington:oai:digital.lib.washington.edu:1773/26900 2023-05-15T14:30:43+02:00 Evaluating Arctic State Implementation of Ecosystem-Based Management Recommendations Supported by the Arctic Council: Canada, Norway, and the US McGrath, Jessica Ford Fluharty, David 2014 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1773/26900 en_US eng McGrath_washington_0250O_13434.pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1773/26900 Copyright is held by the individual authors. Arctic Canada Ecosystem-based management Evaluation Norway United States Environmental management International relations Natural resource management marine affairs Thesis 2014 ftunivwashington 2023-03-12T18:51:54Z Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2014 The Arctic is a dynamic environment with growing global attention stimulated by a changing climate. Because the Arctic Ocean remains a common pool resource, the need for an ecosystem approach to oceans management (EBM) is widely acknowledged on the international level. In 2009 a report supported by the Arctic Council titled, Best Practices in Ecosystems Based Oceans Management, provided recommendations for EBM implementation. This research project consists of a cross-case comparative analysis of Canada, Norway, and the United States and their efforts to implement EBM in the Arctic ecosystem while incorporating the recommendations into their domestic policies. By utilizing document analysis and a series of interviews, I find significant differences in both the commitment of best practices and level of implementation between the countries. Barriers, opportunities, and future actions are also identified and discussed in an effort to promote further implementation of EBM research among both Arctic and non-Arctic states. Thesis Arctic Council Arctic Arctic Ocean University of Washington, Seattle: ResearchWorks Arctic Arctic Ocean Canada Norway |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of Washington, Seattle: ResearchWorks |
op_collection_id |
ftunivwashington |
language |
English |
topic |
Arctic Canada Ecosystem-based management Evaluation Norway United States Environmental management International relations Natural resource management marine affairs |
spellingShingle |
Arctic Canada Ecosystem-based management Evaluation Norway United States Environmental management International relations Natural resource management marine affairs McGrath, Jessica Ford Evaluating Arctic State Implementation of Ecosystem-Based Management Recommendations Supported by the Arctic Council: Canada, Norway, and the US |
topic_facet |
Arctic Canada Ecosystem-based management Evaluation Norway United States Environmental management International relations Natural resource management marine affairs |
description |
Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2014 The Arctic is a dynamic environment with growing global attention stimulated by a changing climate. Because the Arctic Ocean remains a common pool resource, the need for an ecosystem approach to oceans management (EBM) is widely acknowledged on the international level. In 2009 a report supported by the Arctic Council titled, Best Practices in Ecosystems Based Oceans Management, provided recommendations for EBM implementation. This research project consists of a cross-case comparative analysis of Canada, Norway, and the United States and their efforts to implement EBM in the Arctic ecosystem while incorporating the recommendations into their domestic policies. By utilizing document analysis and a series of interviews, I find significant differences in both the commitment of best practices and level of implementation between the countries. Barriers, opportunities, and future actions are also identified and discussed in an effort to promote further implementation of EBM research among both Arctic and non-Arctic states. |
author2 |
Fluharty, David |
format |
Thesis |
author |
McGrath, Jessica Ford |
author_facet |
McGrath, Jessica Ford |
author_sort |
McGrath, Jessica Ford |
title |
Evaluating Arctic State Implementation of Ecosystem-Based Management Recommendations Supported by the Arctic Council: Canada, Norway, and the US |
title_short |
Evaluating Arctic State Implementation of Ecosystem-Based Management Recommendations Supported by the Arctic Council: Canada, Norway, and the US |
title_full |
Evaluating Arctic State Implementation of Ecosystem-Based Management Recommendations Supported by the Arctic Council: Canada, Norway, and the US |
title_fullStr |
Evaluating Arctic State Implementation of Ecosystem-Based Management Recommendations Supported by the Arctic Council: Canada, Norway, and the US |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluating Arctic State Implementation of Ecosystem-Based Management Recommendations Supported by the Arctic Council: Canada, Norway, and the US |
title_sort |
evaluating arctic state implementation of ecosystem-based management recommendations supported by the arctic council: canada, norway, and the us |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1773/26900 |
geographic |
Arctic Arctic Ocean Canada Norway |
geographic_facet |
Arctic Arctic Ocean Canada Norway |
genre |
Arctic Council Arctic Arctic Ocean |
genre_facet |
Arctic Council Arctic Arctic Ocean |
op_relation |
McGrath_washington_0250O_13434.pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1773/26900 |
op_rights |
Copyright is held by the individual authors. |
_version_ |
1766304549899862016 |