Where did the rats of big South Cape Island come from?

The ship rat invasion of Big South Cape Island/Taukihepa in the 1960s was an ecological catastrophe that marked a turning point for the management of rodents on offshore islands of New Zealand. Despite the importance of this event in the conservation history of New Zealand, and subsequent major adva...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robins, Judith H., Miller, Steven D., Russell, James C., Harper, Grant A., Fewster, Rachel M.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: New Zealand Ecological Society 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10289/10155
id ftunivwaikato:oai:researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz:10289/10155
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivwaikato:oai:researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz:10289/10155 2023-07-02T03:33:36+02:00 Where did the rats of big South Cape Island come from? Robins, Judith H. Miller, Steven D. Russell, James C. Harper, Grant A. Fewster, Rachel M. 2016 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/10289/10155 en eng New Zealand Ecological Society New Zealand Journal of Ecology Robins, J. H., Miller, S. D., Russell, J. C., Harper, G. A., & Fewster, R. M. (2016). Where did the rats of big South Cape Island come from? New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 40(2), 229–234. 0110-6465 https://hdl.handle.net/10289/10155 © New Zealand Ecological Society. Used with permission. Journal Article 2016 ftunivwaikato 2023-06-13T17:22:41Z The ship rat invasion of Big South Cape Island/Taukihepa in the 1960s was an ecological catastrophe that marked a turning point for the management of rodents on offshore islands of New Zealand. Despite the importance of this event in the conservation history of New Zealand, and subsequent major advances in rodent eradication and biosecurity, the source and pathway of the rat invasion of Big South Cape Island has never been identified. Using modern molecular methods on contemporary and historical tissue samples, we identify the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) haplotype of ship rats (Rattus rattus) on Big South Cape Island and compare it to that of ship rats in the neighbouring regions of Stewart Island/Rakiura and southern New Zealand, all hypothesised as possible source sites for the invasion. We identify two haplotype clusters, each comprising three closely related haplotypes; one cluster unique to Stewart Island, and the other found in southern New Zealand and elsewhere. By a process of elimination we rule that the ship rat invasion of Big South Cape Island was neither by swimming nor boat transport from Stewart Island, and is unlikely to have come from the south coast ports of New Zealand. However, because the ship rat haplotype found on Big South Cape Island is cosmopolitan to New Zealand’s South Island and elsewhere, we can only confirm that the invasion likely originated from some distance, but are not able to identify the invasion source more precisely. An unexpected consequence of our study is the discovery of five new mtDNA haplotypes for R. rattus that have not been previously reported. Article in Journal/Newspaper Rattus rattus The University of Waikato: Research Commons New Zealand
institution Open Polar
collection The University of Waikato: Research Commons
op_collection_id ftunivwaikato
language English
description The ship rat invasion of Big South Cape Island/Taukihepa in the 1960s was an ecological catastrophe that marked a turning point for the management of rodents on offshore islands of New Zealand. Despite the importance of this event in the conservation history of New Zealand, and subsequent major advances in rodent eradication and biosecurity, the source and pathway of the rat invasion of Big South Cape Island has never been identified. Using modern molecular methods on contemporary and historical tissue samples, we identify the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) haplotype of ship rats (Rattus rattus) on Big South Cape Island and compare it to that of ship rats in the neighbouring regions of Stewart Island/Rakiura and southern New Zealand, all hypothesised as possible source sites for the invasion. We identify two haplotype clusters, each comprising three closely related haplotypes; one cluster unique to Stewart Island, and the other found in southern New Zealand and elsewhere. By a process of elimination we rule that the ship rat invasion of Big South Cape Island was neither by swimming nor boat transport from Stewart Island, and is unlikely to have come from the south coast ports of New Zealand. However, because the ship rat haplotype found on Big South Cape Island is cosmopolitan to New Zealand’s South Island and elsewhere, we can only confirm that the invasion likely originated from some distance, but are not able to identify the invasion source more precisely. An unexpected consequence of our study is the discovery of five new mtDNA haplotypes for R. rattus that have not been previously reported.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Robins, Judith H.
Miller, Steven D.
Russell, James C.
Harper, Grant A.
Fewster, Rachel M.
spellingShingle Robins, Judith H.
Miller, Steven D.
Russell, James C.
Harper, Grant A.
Fewster, Rachel M.
Where did the rats of big South Cape Island come from?
author_facet Robins, Judith H.
Miller, Steven D.
Russell, James C.
Harper, Grant A.
Fewster, Rachel M.
author_sort Robins, Judith H.
title Where did the rats of big South Cape Island come from?
title_short Where did the rats of big South Cape Island come from?
title_full Where did the rats of big South Cape Island come from?
title_fullStr Where did the rats of big South Cape Island come from?
title_full_unstemmed Where did the rats of big South Cape Island come from?
title_sort where did the rats of big south cape island come from?
publisher New Zealand Ecological Society
publishDate 2016
url https://hdl.handle.net/10289/10155
geographic New Zealand
geographic_facet New Zealand
genre Rattus rattus
genre_facet Rattus rattus
op_relation New Zealand Journal of Ecology
Robins, J. H., Miller, S. D., Russell, J. C., Harper, G. A., & Fewster, R. M. (2016). Where did the rats of big South Cape Island come from? New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 40(2), 229–234.
0110-6465
https://hdl.handle.net/10289/10155
op_rights © New Zealand Ecological Society. Used with permission.
_version_ 1770273613786644480