A quantitative comparison of microfossil extraction methods from ice cores

Microfossil records from ice archives allow vegetation, fire and land-use activity reconstructions on broad spatial scales. Samples typically contain low microfossil concentrations. Therefore, large ice volumes are often needed for palynology. Hence, it is crucial to extract maximum microfossil numb...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Glaciology
Main Authors: Brugger, Sandra O., Gobet, Erika, Schanz, F.R.S., Heiri, Oliver, Schwörer, Christoph, Sigl, Michael, Schwikowski, Margit, Tinner, Willy
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/a-quantitative-comparison-of-microfossil-extraction-methods-from-
https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.31
id ftunivwagenin:oai:library.wur.nl:wurpubs/628425
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivwagenin:oai:library.wur.nl:wurpubs/628425 2024-04-28T08:26:49+00:00 A quantitative comparison of microfossil extraction methods from ice cores Brugger, Sandra O. Gobet, Erika Schanz, F.R.S. Heiri, Oliver Schwörer, Christoph Sigl, Michael Schwikowski, Margit Tinner, Willy 2018 text/html https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/a-quantitative-comparison-of-microfossil-extraction-methods-from- https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.31 en eng https://edepot.wur.nl/653862 https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/a-quantitative-comparison-of-microfossil-extraction-methods-from- doi:10.1017/jog.2018.31 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Wageningen University & Research Journal of Glaciology 64 (2018) 245 ISSN: 0022-1430 Life Science Article/Letter to editor 2018 ftunivwagenin https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.31 2024-04-03T15:17:23Z Microfossil records from ice archives allow vegetation, fire and land-use activity reconstructions on broad spatial scales. Samples typically contain low microfossil concentrations. Therefore, large ice volumes are often needed for palynology. Hence, it is crucial to extract maximum microfossil numbers through appropriate physical-chemical treatments. We compare six methods covering the main water reduction procedures: evaporation, filtration and centrifugation with snow samples. Adding a known number of Lycopodium marker spores prior to sample treatment and a second marker (Eucalyptus) after laboratory processing allows a quantitative microfossil loss assessment during pollen extraction. We applied the best-performing method (average loss of 22%) to high-alpine firn cores from Colle Gnifetti glacier for validation with a natural archive containing extremely low microfossil concentrations. We conclude that samples processed with different microfossil extraction protocols may give different results for pollen concentrations, percentages and ratios between different pollen types, especially if vesiculate conifer pollen is an important pollen assemblage component. We recommend a new evaporation-based method which delivers the smallest and least variable losses among the tested approaches. Since microfossil losses are inevitable during laboratory procedure, adding markers prior to sample processing is mandatory to achieve reliable microfossil concentration and influx estimates. Article in Journal/Newspaper Journal of Glaciology Wageningen UR (University & Research Centre): Digital Library Journal of Glaciology 64 245 432 442
institution Open Polar
collection Wageningen UR (University & Research Centre): Digital Library
op_collection_id ftunivwagenin
language English
topic Life Science
spellingShingle Life Science
Brugger, Sandra O.
Gobet, Erika
Schanz, F.R.S.
Heiri, Oliver
Schwörer, Christoph
Sigl, Michael
Schwikowski, Margit
Tinner, Willy
A quantitative comparison of microfossil extraction methods from ice cores
topic_facet Life Science
description Microfossil records from ice archives allow vegetation, fire and land-use activity reconstructions on broad spatial scales. Samples typically contain low microfossil concentrations. Therefore, large ice volumes are often needed for palynology. Hence, it is crucial to extract maximum microfossil numbers through appropriate physical-chemical treatments. We compare six methods covering the main water reduction procedures: evaporation, filtration and centrifugation with snow samples. Adding a known number of Lycopodium marker spores prior to sample treatment and a second marker (Eucalyptus) after laboratory processing allows a quantitative microfossil loss assessment during pollen extraction. We applied the best-performing method (average loss of 22%) to high-alpine firn cores from Colle Gnifetti glacier for validation with a natural archive containing extremely low microfossil concentrations. We conclude that samples processed with different microfossil extraction protocols may give different results for pollen concentrations, percentages and ratios between different pollen types, especially if vesiculate conifer pollen is an important pollen assemblage component. We recommend a new evaporation-based method which delivers the smallest and least variable losses among the tested approaches. Since microfossil losses are inevitable during laboratory procedure, adding markers prior to sample processing is mandatory to achieve reliable microfossil concentration and influx estimates.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Brugger, Sandra O.
Gobet, Erika
Schanz, F.R.S.
Heiri, Oliver
Schwörer, Christoph
Sigl, Michael
Schwikowski, Margit
Tinner, Willy
author_facet Brugger, Sandra O.
Gobet, Erika
Schanz, F.R.S.
Heiri, Oliver
Schwörer, Christoph
Sigl, Michael
Schwikowski, Margit
Tinner, Willy
author_sort Brugger, Sandra O.
title A quantitative comparison of microfossil extraction methods from ice cores
title_short A quantitative comparison of microfossil extraction methods from ice cores
title_full A quantitative comparison of microfossil extraction methods from ice cores
title_fullStr A quantitative comparison of microfossil extraction methods from ice cores
title_full_unstemmed A quantitative comparison of microfossil extraction methods from ice cores
title_sort quantitative comparison of microfossil extraction methods from ice cores
publishDate 2018
url https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/a-quantitative-comparison-of-microfossil-extraction-methods-from-
https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.31
genre Journal of Glaciology
genre_facet Journal of Glaciology
op_source Journal of Glaciology 64 (2018) 245
ISSN: 0022-1430
op_relation https://edepot.wur.nl/653862
https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/a-quantitative-comparison-of-microfossil-extraction-methods-from-
doi:10.1017/jog.2018.31
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Wageningen University & Research
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.31
container_title Journal of Glaciology
container_volume 64
container_issue 245
container_start_page 432
op_container_end_page 442
_version_ 1797586051261267968