Not erroneous but cautious conclusions about the potential effect of climate change on the geographical distribution of insect pest species in the Swedish boreal forest. Response to Björklund et al. (2015)

We argue that the conclusions drawn from the paper “The potential effect of climate change on the geographical distribution of insect pest species in the Swedish boreal forest”, published in the Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research were not erroneous as stated by a letter published in the same jo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research
Main Authors: Hof, Anouschka R., Svahlin, Anna
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/not-erroneous-but-cautious-conclusions-about-the-potential-effect
https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2015.1079644
id ftunivwagenin:oai:library.wur.nl:wurpubs/581248
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivwagenin:oai:library.wur.nl:wurpubs/581248 2024-02-04T10:03:18+01:00 Not erroneous but cautious conclusions about the potential effect of climate change on the geographical distribution of insect pest species in the Swedish boreal forest. Response to Björklund et al. (2015) Hof, Anouschka R. Svahlin, Anna 2016 text/html https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/not-erroneous-but-cautious-conclusions-about-the-potential-effect https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2015.1079644 en eng https://edepot.wur.nl/545018 https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/not-erroneous-but-cautious-conclusions-about-the-potential-effect doi:10.1080/02827581.2015.1079644 info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess Wageningen University & Research Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 31 (2016) 1 ISSN: 0282-7581 Climate change Norway spruce Scots pine forestry insects pests species distribution modelling info:eu-repo/semantics/article Article/Letter to editor info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2016 ftunivwagenin https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2015.1079644 2024-01-10T23:18:22Z We argue that the conclusions drawn from the paper “The potential effect of climate change on the geographical distribution of insect pest species in the Swedish boreal forest”, published in the Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research were not erroneous as stated by a letter published in the same journal by Björklund et al. (2015. Erroneous conclusions about current geographical distribution and future expansion of forest insects in Northern Sweden: Comments on Hof and Svahlin (2015). Scand. J. Forest Res)”, but cautious. We regret possible underestimations caused by lack of occurrence records for some species for some areas. However, basing predictions of the impact of future climate change on the distribution of species on current range maps likely leads to grave overestimations of future range predictions since current range maps assume species are homogenously distributed throughout the landscape, which is often not the case. We argue that underestimating the distribution range of pest species rather than overestimating their distribution pinpoints areas that may need extra attention in future better, and therefore chose to be cautious rather than bold. We further like to stress that one should always be aware of possible insect outbreaks throughout the region, not only because predictions may underestimate the future distribution of species but also since the location and likelihood of insect pest outbreaks is not only determined by climatic factors. Article in Journal/Newspaper Northern Sweden Wageningen UR (University & Research Centre): Digital Library Björklund ENVELOPE(17.265,17.265,66.183,66.183) Norway Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 31 1 128 129
institution Open Polar
collection Wageningen UR (University & Research Centre): Digital Library
op_collection_id ftunivwagenin
language English
topic Climate change
Norway spruce
Scots pine
forestry
insects
pests
species distribution modelling
spellingShingle Climate change
Norway spruce
Scots pine
forestry
insects
pests
species distribution modelling
Hof, Anouschka R.
Svahlin, Anna
Not erroneous but cautious conclusions about the potential effect of climate change on the geographical distribution of insect pest species in the Swedish boreal forest. Response to Björklund et al. (2015)
topic_facet Climate change
Norway spruce
Scots pine
forestry
insects
pests
species distribution modelling
description We argue that the conclusions drawn from the paper “The potential effect of climate change on the geographical distribution of insect pest species in the Swedish boreal forest”, published in the Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research were not erroneous as stated by a letter published in the same journal by Björklund et al. (2015. Erroneous conclusions about current geographical distribution and future expansion of forest insects in Northern Sweden: Comments on Hof and Svahlin (2015). Scand. J. Forest Res)”, but cautious. We regret possible underestimations caused by lack of occurrence records for some species for some areas. However, basing predictions of the impact of future climate change on the distribution of species on current range maps likely leads to grave overestimations of future range predictions since current range maps assume species are homogenously distributed throughout the landscape, which is often not the case. We argue that underestimating the distribution range of pest species rather than overestimating their distribution pinpoints areas that may need extra attention in future better, and therefore chose to be cautious rather than bold. We further like to stress that one should always be aware of possible insect outbreaks throughout the region, not only because predictions may underestimate the future distribution of species but also since the location and likelihood of insect pest outbreaks is not only determined by climatic factors.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Hof, Anouschka R.
Svahlin, Anna
author_facet Hof, Anouschka R.
Svahlin, Anna
author_sort Hof, Anouschka R.
title Not erroneous but cautious conclusions about the potential effect of climate change on the geographical distribution of insect pest species in the Swedish boreal forest. Response to Björklund et al. (2015)
title_short Not erroneous but cautious conclusions about the potential effect of climate change on the geographical distribution of insect pest species in the Swedish boreal forest. Response to Björklund et al. (2015)
title_full Not erroneous but cautious conclusions about the potential effect of climate change on the geographical distribution of insect pest species in the Swedish boreal forest. Response to Björklund et al. (2015)
title_fullStr Not erroneous but cautious conclusions about the potential effect of climate change on the geographical distribution of insect pest species in the Swedish boreal forest. Response to Björklund et al. (2015)
title_full_unstemmed Not erroneous but cautious conclusions about the potential effect of climate change on the geographical distribution of insect pest species in the Swedish boreal forest. Response to Björklund et al. (2015)
title_sort not erroneous but cautious conclusions about the potential effect of climate change on the geographical distribution of insect pest species in the swedish boreal forest. response to björklund et al. (2015)
publishDate 2016
url https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/not-erroneous-but-cautious-conclusions-about-the-potential-effect
https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2015.1079644
long_lat ENVELOPE(17.265,17.265,66.183,66.183)
geographic Björklund
Norway
geographic_facet Björklund
Norway
genre Northern Sweden
genre_facet Northern Sweden
op_source Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 31 (2016) 1
ISSN: 0282-7581
op_relation https://edepot.wur.nl/545018
https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/not-erroneous-but-cautious-conclusions-about-the-potential-effect
doi:10.1080/02827581.2015.1079644
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
Wageningen University & Research
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2015.1079644
container_title Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research
container_volume 31
container_issue 1
container_start_page 128
op_container_end_page 129
_version_ 1789970612397015040