Minimal glacier models

During the past few decades the study of glaciers and their response to climate change has shown a strong development. Early theoretical work in the fifties and sixties has been complemented by the construction of numerical models of glaciers and ice sheets with various degrees of complexity. Observ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Oerlemans, J.
Other Authors: Marine and Atmospheric Research, Dep Natuurkunde
Format: Book
Language:unknown
Published: Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving Services 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/224622
id ftunivutrecht:oai:dspace.library.uu.nl:1874/224622
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivutrecht:oai:dspace.library.uu.nl:1874/224622 2023-07-23T04:19:51+02:00 Minimal glacier models Oerlemans, J. Marine and Atmospheric Research Dep Natuurkunde 2008 image/pdf https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/224622 other unknown Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving Services https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/224622 info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess Book 2008 ftunivutrecht 2023-07-02T00:02:05Z During the past few decades the study of glaciers and their response to climate change has shown a strong development. Early theoretical work in the fifties and sixties has been complemented by the construction of numerical models of glaciers and ice sheets with various degrees of complexity. Observations of glaciers from space have given us a much better view on where the glaciers are and what they look like. More recently, advanced techniques like SAR interferometry have revealed an unexpectedly rich dynamic behaviour of many ice bodies. Fast flow (intermittent or continuous) has been observed on a large number of glaciers, and this finding suggests that many glaciers may adjust to climate change more quickly than hitherto assumed. In view of these developments it may seem a bit odd to write a text on “Minimal Glacier Models“. Why play around with simple quasi-analytical models if computer power is virtually unlimited to run codes on very high resolution? Well, digging into to numerical models and codes for more than 20 years has revealed to me that numerical modelling also has negative sides. First of all, documentation of codes (including my own) is normally inadequate, details of how boundary conditions are implemented in a numerical scheme are generally not described, and altogether reproducibility is poor. An outstanding problem is the dependence of numerical solutions on the resolution of a computational mesh or grid, in particular when the balance rate depends on surface elevation, or when the position of the grounding line plays an important role in the evolution of an ice sheet. This criticism is not meant to claim that one should stick with simpler models, but it helps to appreciate that there are more lines along which glaciers can be studied. Simple models are first of all learning tools. There is an intrinsic value in models that can be solved analytically or coded by a student in a couple of days. Simple models have the advantage that the parameter space can be explored in great detail. This ... Book Ice Sheet Utrecht University Repository
institution Open Polar
collection Utrecht University Repository
op_collection_id ftunivutrecht
language unknown
description During the past few decades the study of glaciers and their response to climate change has shown a strong development. Early theoretical work in the fifties and sixties has been complemented by the construction of numerical models of glaciers and ice sheets with various degrees of complexity. Observations of glaciers from space have given us a much better view on where the glaciers are and what they look like. More recently, advanced techniques like SAR interferometry have revealed an unexpectedly rich dynamic behaviour of many ice bodies. Fast flow (intermittent or continuous) has been observed on a large number of glaciers, and this finding suggests that many glaciers may adjust to climate change more quickly than hitherto assumed. In view of these developments it may seem a bit odd to write a text on “Minimal Glacier Models“. Why play around with simple quasi-analytical models if computer power is virtually unlimited to run codes on very high resolution? Well, digging into to numerical models and codes for more than 20 years has revealed to me that numerical modelling also has negative sides. First of all, documentation of codes (including my own) is normally inadequate, details of how boundary conditions are implemented in a numerical scheme are generally not described, and altogether reproducibility is poor. An outstanding problem is the dependence of numerical solutions on the resolution of a computational mesh or grid, in particular when the balance rate depends on surface elevation, or when the position of the grounding line plays an important role in the evolution of an ice sheet. This criticism is not meant to claim that one should stick with simpler models, but it helps to appreciate that there are more lines along which glaciers can be studied. Simple models are first of all learning tools. There is an intrinsic value in models that can be solved analytically or coded by a student in a couple of days. Simple models have the advantage that the parameter space can be explored in great detail. This ...
author2 Marine and Atmospheric Research
Dep Natuurkunde
format Book
author Oerlemans, J.
spellingShingle Oerlemans, J.
Minimal glacier models
author_facet Oerlemans, J.
author_sort Oerlemans, J.
title Minimal glacier models
title_short Minimal glacier models
title_full Minimal glacier models
title_fullStr Minimal glacier models
title_full_unstemmed Minimal glacier models
title_sort minimal glacier models
publisher Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving Services
publishDate 2008
url https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/224622
genre Ice Sheet
genre_facet Ice Sheet
op_relation https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/224622
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
_version_ 1772183323095859200