Mantle viscosity inference: a comparison between simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm inversion methods

Two direct search methods, simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm, are applied to the inversion of the viscosity profile of the mantle using relative sea level time-histories for the Hudson Bay region. In problems characterized by a low-dimensional model space (Nd = 2 in this study), the tw...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Journal International
Main Authors: N. PIANA AGOSTINETTI, S. CIANETTI, SPADA, GIORGIO
Other Authors: N., PIANA AGOSTINETTI, Spada, Giorgio, S., Cianetti
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11576/1886044
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02237.x
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02237.x/abstract
_version_ 1835015723840176128
author N. PIANA AGOSTINETTI
S. CIANETTI
SPADA, GIORGIO
author2 N., PIANA AGOSTINETTI
Spada, Giorgio
S., Cianetti
author_facet N. PIANA AGOSTINETTI
S. CIANETTI
SPADA, GIORGIO
author_sort N. PIANA AGOSTINETTI
collection Unknown
container_issue 2
container_start_page 890
container_title Geophysical Journal International
container_volume 157
description Two direct search methods, simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm, are applied to the inversion of the viscosity profile of the mantle using relative sea level time-histories for the Hudson Bay region. In problems characterized by a low-dimensional model space (Nd = 2 in this study), the two inversion methods show comparable performances. When a larger number of dimensions is involved (specifically Nd = 6), we directly show that simulated annealing is less effective than neighbourhood algorithm in overcoming the obstacles that are found in the model space when our specific data set is employed. This study confirms that modifications of the conventional Monte Carlo inversion method, such as simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm, are viable tools to determine the viscosity profile of the mantle, which, until recently, has been mainly tackled by means of linearized techniques.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Hudson Bay
genre_facet Hudson Bay
geographic Hudson
Hudson Bay
geographic_facet Hudson
Hudson Bay
id ftunivurbino:oai:ora.uniurb.it:11576/1886044
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftunivurbino
op_container_end_page 900
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02237.x
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000221422500031
volume:157
firstpage:890
lastpage:900
numberofpages:11
journal:GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
http://hdl.handle.net/11576/1886044
publishDate 2004
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivurbino:oai:ora.uniurb.it:11576/1886044 2025-06-15T14:29:08+00:00 Mantle viscosity inference: a comparison between simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm inversion methods N. PIANA AGOSTINETTI S. CIANETTI SPADA, GIORGIO N., PIANA AGOSTINETTI Spada, Giorgio S., Cianetti 2004 STAMPA http://hdl.handle.net/11576/1886044 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02237.x http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02237.x/abstract eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000221422500031 volume:157 firstpage:890 lastpage:900 numberofpages:11 journal:GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL http://hdl.handle.net/11576/1886044 mantle viscosity neighbourhood algorithm postglacial rebound simulated annealing info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2004 ftunivurbino https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02237.x 2025-05-19T03:42:01Z Two direct search methods, simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm, are applied to the inversion of the viscosity profile of the mantle using relative sea level time-histories for the Hudson Bay region. In problems characterized by a low-dimensional model space (Nd = 2 in this study), the two inversion methods show comparable performances. When a larger number of dimensions is involved (specifically Nd = 6), we directly show that simulated annealing is less effective than neighbourhood algorithm in overcoming the obstacles that are found in the model space when our specific data set is employed. This study confirms that modifications of the conventional Monte Carlo inversion method, such as simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm, are viable tools to determine the viscosity profile of the mantle, which, until recently, has been mainly tackled by means of linearized techniques. Article in Journal/Newspaper Hudson Bay Unknown Hudson Hudson Bay Geophysical Journal International 157 2 890 900
spellingShingle mantle viscosity
neighbourhood algorithm
postglacial rebound
simulated annealing
N. PIANA AGOSTINETTI
S. CIANETTI
SPADA, GIORGIO
Mantle viscosity inference: a comparison between simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm inversion methods
title Mantle viscosity inference: a comparison between simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm inversion methods
title_full Mantle viscosity inference: a comparison between simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm inversion methods
title_fullStr Mantle viscosity inference: a comparison between simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm inversion methods
title_full_unstemmed Mantle viscosity inference: a comparison between simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm inversion methods
title_short Mantle viscosity inference: a comparison between simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm inversion methods
title_sort mantle viscosity inference: a comparison between simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm inversion methods
topic mantle viscosity
neighbourhood algorithm
postglacial rebound
simulated annealing
topic_facet mantle viscosity
neighbourhood algorithm
postglacial rebound
simulated annealing
url http://hdl.handle.net/11576/1886044
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02237.x
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02237.x/abstract