Chemical cues from both dangerous and nondangerous snakes elicit antipredator behaviours from a nocturnal lizard

Many prey species use chemical cues to detect predators. According to the threat sensitivity hypothesis, prey should match the intensity of their antipredator behaviour to the degree of threat posed by the predator. Several species of lizards display antipredator behaviours in the presence of snake...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Webb, JK, Du, WG, Pike, DA, Shine, R
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10453/32512
id ftunivtsydney:oai:opus.lib.uts.edu.au:10453/32512
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtsydney:oai:opus.lib.uts.edu.au:10453/32512 2023-05-15T13:51:50+02:00 Chemical cues from both dangerous and nondangerous snakes elicit antipredator behaviours from a nocturnal lizard Webb, JK Du, WG Pike, DA Shine, R 2009-06-01 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10453/32512 unknown Animal Behaviour 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.02.020 Animal Behaviour, 2009, 77 (6), pp. 1471 - 1478 0003-3472 http://hdl.handle.net/10453/32512 Behavioral Science & Comparative Psychology Journal Article 2009 ftunivtsydney 2022-03-13T14:02:18Z Many prey species use chemical cues to detect predators. According to the threat sensitivity hypothesis, prey should match the intensity of their antipredator behaviour to the degree of threat posed by the predator. Several species of lizards display antipredator behaviours in the presence of snake chemical cues, but how species specific are these responses? In Australia, most snake species eat lizards, and are therefore potentially dangerous. Hence, we predicted that lizards should display generalized rather than species-specific antipredator behaviours. To test this prediction, we quantified the behavioural responses of velvet geckos, Oedura lesueurii, to chemical cues from five species of elapid snakes that are syntopic with velvet geckos but differ in their degree of danger. These five snake species included two nocturnal ambush foragers that eat geckos (broad-headed snake Hoplocephalus bungaroides, and death adder, Acanthophis antarcticus), two active foragers that eat skinks (but rarely eat geckos) and that differ in their activity times (nocturnal small-eyed snake, Cryptophis nigrescens, and diurnal whip snake, Demansia psammophis), and a nocturnal nonthreatening species that feeds entirely on blind snakes (bandy-bandy, Vermicella annulata). Geckos showed similar antisnake behaviours (tail waving, tail vibration), and a similar intensity of responses (reducing activity, freezing), to chemical cues from all five snake species, even though the snakes differed in their degree of danger and foraging modes. Our results suggest that velvet geckos display generalized antipredator responses to chemicals from elapid snakes, rather than responding in a graded fashion depending upon the degree of threat posed by a particular snake species. © 2009 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* antarcticus University of Technology Sydney: OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars
institution Open Polar
collection University of Technology Sydney: OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars
op_collection_id ftunivtsydney
language unknown
topic Behavioral Science & Comparative Psychology
spellingShingle Behavioral Science & Comparative Psychology
Webb, JK
Du, WG
Pike, DA
Shine, R
Chemical cues from both dangerous and nondangerous snakes elicit antipredator behaviours from a nocturnal lizard
topic_facet Behavioral Science & Comparative Psychology
description Many prey species use chemical cues to detect predators. According to the threat sensitivity hypothesis, prey should match the intensity of their antipredator behaviour to the degree of threat posed by the predator. Several species of lizards display antipredator behaviours in the presence of snake chemical cues, but how species specific are these responses? In Australia, most snake species eat lizards, and are therefore potentially dangerous. Hence, we predicted that lizards should display generalized rather than species-specific antipredator behaviours. To test this prediction, we quantified the behavioural responses of velvet geckos, Oedura lesueurii, to chemical cues from five species of elapid snakes that are syntopic with velvet geckos but differ in their degree of danger. These five snake species included two nocturnal ambush foragers that eat geckos (broad-headed snake Hoplocephalus bungaroides, and death adder, Acanthophis antarcticus), two active foragers that eat skinks (but rarely eat geckos) and that differ in their activity times (nocturnal small-eyed snake, Cryptophis nigrescens, and diurnal whip snake, Demansia psammophis), and a nocturnal nonthreatening species that feeds entirely on blind snakes (bandy-bandy, Vermicella annulata). Geckos showed similar antisnake behaviours (tail waving, tail vibration), and a similar intensity of responses (reducing activity, freezing), to chemical cues from all five snake species, even though the snakes differed in their degree of danger and foraging modes. Our results suggest that velvet geckos display generalized antipredator responses to chemicals from elapid snakes, rather than responding in a graded fashion depending upon the degree of threat posed by a particular snake species. © 2009 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Webb, JK
Du, WG
Pike, DA
Shine, R
author_facet Webb, JK
Du, WG
Pike, DA
Shine, R
author_sort Webb, JK
title Chemical cues from both dangerous and nondangerous snakes elicit antipredator behaviours from a nocturnal lizard
title_short Chemical cues from both dangerous and nondangerous snakes elicit antipredator behaviours from a nocturnal lizard
title_full Chemical cues from both dangerous and nondangerous snakes elicit antipredator behaviours from a nocturnal lizard
title_fullStr Chemical cues from both dangerous and nondangerous snakes elicit antipredator behaviours from a nocturnal lizard
title_full_unstemmed Chemical cues from both dangerous and nondangerous snakes elicit antipredator behaviours from a nocturnal lizard
title_sort chemical cues from both dangerous and nondangerous snakes elicit antipredator behaviours from a nocturnal lizard
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/10453/32512
genre Antarc*
antarcticus
genre_facet Antarc*
antarcticus
op_relation Animal Behaviour
10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.02.020
Animal Behaviour, 2009, 77 (6), pp. 1471 - 1478
0003-3472
http://hdl.handle.net/10453/32512
_version_ 1766255874426273792