Antarctic coastal microalgal primary production and photosynthesis
Primary production in coastal Antarctica is primarily contributed from three sources: sea ice algae, phytoplankton, and microphytobenthos. Compared to other eastern Antarctic sites, the sea ice microalgal biomass at Casey Station, in spring 2005 was relatively low, 3.84 ± 1.67 to 21.6 ± 13.3 mg chl-...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/22811 |
_version_ | 1821755249290903552 |
---|---|
author | McMinn, A Ashworth, C Bhagooli, R Martin, A Salleh, S Ralph, P Ryan, K |
author_facet | McMinn, A Ashworth, C Bhagooli, R Martin, A Salleh, S Ralph, P Ryan, K |
author_sort | McMinn, A |
collection | University of Technology Sydney: OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars |
description | Primary production in coastal Antarctica is primarily contributed from three sources: sea ice algae, phytoplankton, and microphytobenthos. Compared to other eastern Antarctic sites, the sea ice microalgal biomass at Casey Station, in spring 2005 was relatively low, 3.84 ± 1.67 to 21.6 ± 13.3 mg chl-a m-2 but productive, 103-163 mg C m-2 day-1. The photosynthetic parameters, Fv/Fm and rETRmax, imply a community well-acclimated to the light climate of the benthic, water column, and sea ice habitats. Phytoplankton biomass was greatest in late spring (11.1 ± 0.920 μg chl-a l-1), which probably reflects input from the overlying sea ice. Lower biomass and depressed Fv/Fm values later in the season were probably due to nutrient limitation. Benthic microalgal biomass was consistently between 200 and 400 mg chl-a m-2 and production increased through into late summer (204 mg C m-2 day-1). After the sea ice broke out, the marine environment supported a small phytoplankton biomass and a large benthic microalgal biomass. Compared with previous studies, Fv/Fm values were relatively low but there was no evidence of photoinhibition. When sea ice was present, primary production of benthic microalgae was either very low or there was a net draw down of oxygen. The benthic microalgal community made a larger contribution to total primary production than the phytoplankton or sea ice algae at water depth less than approximately 5 m. © 2012 Springer-Verlag. |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica ice algae Sea ice |
genre_facet | Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica ice algae Sea ice |
geographic | Antarctic Casey Station |
geographic_facet | Antarctic Casey Station |
id | ftunivtsydney:oai:opus.lib.uts.edu.au:10453/22811 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | unknown |
long_lat | ENVELOPE(110.528,110.528,-66.282,-66.282) |
op_collection_id | ftunivtsydney |
op_relation | Marine Biology 10.1007/s00227-012-2044-0 Marine Biology, 2012, 159 (12), pp. 2827 - 2837 0025-3162 http://hdl.handle.net/10453/22811 |
publishDate | 2012 |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftunivtsydney:oai:opus.lib.uts.edu.au:10453/22811 2025-01-16T19:24:21+00:00 Antarctic coastal microalgal primary production and photosynthesis McMinn, A Ashworth, C Bhagooli, R Martin, A Salleh, S Ralph, P Ryan, K 2012-12-01 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10453/22811 unknown Marine Biology 10.1007/s00227-012-2044-0 Marine Biology, 2012, 159 (12), pp. 2827 - 2837 0025-3162 http://hdl.handle.net/10453/22811 Marine Biology & Hydrobiology Journal Article 2012 ftunivtsydney 2022-03-13T13:20:40Z Primary production in coastal Antarctica is primarily contributed from three sources: sea ice algae, phytoplankton, and microphytobenthos. Compared to other eastern Antarctic sites, the sea ice microalgal biomass at Casey Station, in spring 2005 was relatively low, 3.84 ± 1.67 to 21.6 ± 13.3 mg chl-a m-2 but productive, 103-163 mg C m-2 day-1. The photosynthetic parameters, Fv/Fm and rETRmax, imply a community well-acclimated to the light climate of the benthic, water column, and sea ice habitats. Phytoplankton biomass was greatest in late spring (11.1 ± 0.920 μg chl-a l-1), which probably reflects input from the overlying sea ice. Lower biomass and depressed Fv/Fm values later in the season were probably due to nutrient limitation. Benthic microalgal biomass was consistently between 200 and 400 mg chl-a m-2 and production increased through into late summer (204 mg C m-2 day-1). After the sea ice broke out, the marine environment supported a small phytoplankton biomass and a large benthic microalgal biomass. Compared with previous studies, Fv/Fm values were relatively low but there was no evidence of photoinhibition. When sea ice was present, primary production of benthic microalgae was either very low or there was a net draw down of oxygen. The benthic microalgal community made a larger contribution to total primary production than the phytoplankton or sea ice algae at water depth less than approximately 5 m. © 2012 Springer-Verlag. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica ice algae Sea ice University of Technology Sydney: OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars Antarctic Casey Station ENVELOPE(110.528,110.528,-66.282,-66.282) |
spellingShingle | Marine Biology & Hydrobiology McMinn, A Ashworth, C Bhagooli, R Martin, A Salleh, S Ralph, P Ryan, K Antarctic coastal microalgal primary production and photosynthesis |
title | Antarctic coastal microalgal primary production and photosynthesis |
title_full | Antarctic coastal microalgal primary production and photosynthesis |
title_fullStr | Antarctic coastal microalgal primary production and photosynthesis |
title_full_unstemmed | Antarctic coastal microalgal primary production and photosynthesis |
title_short | Antarctic coastal microalgal primary production and photosynthesis |
title_sort | antarctic coastal microalgal primary production and photosynthesis |
topic | Marine Biology & Hydrobiology |
topic_facet | Marine Biology & Hydrobiology |
url | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/22811 |