Are there multiple scaling regimes in Holocene temperature records?

The concept of multiple scaling regimes in temperature time series is examined, with emphasis on the question whether or not a mono-scaling model can be rejected from the data at hand. A model with only one regime is simpler and is preferred if this 5 explains the observed variability. Our analysis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nilsen, Tine, Rypdal, Kristoffer, Fredriksen, Hege-Beate
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus GmbH 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10037/8449
https://doi.org/10.5194/esdd-6-1201-2015
_version_ 1829301243096334336
author Nilsen, Tine
Rypdal, Kristoffer
Fredriksen, Hege-Beate
author_facet Nilsen, Tine
Rypdal, Kristoffer
Fredriksen, Hege-Beate
author_sort Nilsen, Tine
collection University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive
description The concept of multiple scaling regimes in temperature time series is examined, with emphasis on the question whether or not a mono-scaling model can be rejected from the data at hand. A model with only one regime is simpler and is preferred if this 5 explains the observed variability. Our analysis of spectra from reconstructed air temperature from Greenland and Antarctica ice cores shows that a scale break around centennial time scales is evident for the last glacial period, but not for the Holocene. Nor by analysing a number of late Holocene multiproxy temperature reconstructions can a significant scale break be identified. Our results indicate that a mono-scaling 10 model cannot be rejected as a null model for the Holocene climate up to at least millennial time scales, although it can be rejected for the glacial climate state. The scale break observed from the glacial time ice core records is likely caused by the influence of Dansgaard–Oeschger events and teleconnections to the Southern Hemisphere on centennial time scales. From our analysis we conclude that the two-regime model is 15 not sufficiently justified for the Holocene to be used for temperature prediction on centennial time scales
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
Dansgaard-Oeschger events
Greenland
ice core
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
Dansgaard-Oeschger events
Greenland
ice core
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
id ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/8449
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftunivtroemsoe
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/esdd-6-1201-2015
op_relation FRIDAID 1287739
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/8449
op_rights openAccess
publishDate 2015
publisher Copernicus GmbH
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/8449 2025-04-13T14:09:21+00:00 Are there multiple scaling regimes in Holocene temperature records? Nilsen, Tine Rypdal, Kristoffer Fredriksen, Hege-Beate 2015-07-17 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/8449 https://doi.org/10.5194/esdd-6-1201-2015 eng eng Copernicus GmbH FRIDAID 1287739 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/8449 openAccess VDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Geofag: 450::Meteorologi: 453 Journal article Tidsskriftartikkel 2015 ftunivtroemsoe https://doi.org/10.5194/esdd-6-1201-2015 2025-03-14T05:17:56Z The concept of multiple scaling regimes in temperature time series is examined, with emphasis on the question whether or not a mono-scaling model can be rejected from the data at hand. A model with only one regime is simpler and is preferred if this 5 explains the observed variability. Our analysis of spectra from reconstructed air temperature from Greenland and Antarctica ice cores shows that a scale break around centennial time scales is evident for the last glacial period, but not for the Holocene. Nor by analysing a number of late Holocene multiproxy temperature reconstructions can a significant scale break be identified. Our results indicate that a mono-scaling 10 model cannot be rejected as a null model for the Holocene climate up to at least millennial time scales, although it can be rejected for the glacial climate state. The scale break observed from the glacial time ice core records is likely caused by the influence of Dansgaard–Oeschger events and teleconnections to the Southern Hemisphere on centennial time scales. From our analysis we conclude that the two-regime model is 15 not sufficiently justified for the Holocene to be used for temperature prediction on centennial time scales Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Dansgaard-Oeschger events Greenland ice core University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive Greenland
spellingShingle VDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Geofag: 450::Meteorologi: 453
Nilsen, Tine
Rypdal, Kristoffer
Fredriksen, Hege-Beate
Are there multiple scaling regimes in Holocene temperature records?
title Are there multiple scaling regimes in Holocene temperature records?
title_full Are there multiple scaling regimes in Holocene temperature records?
title_fullStr Are there multiple scaling regimes in Holocene temperature records?
title_full_unstemmed Are there multiple scaling regimes in Holocene temperature records?
title_short Are there multiple scaling regimes in Holocene temperature records?
title_sort are there multiple scaling regimes in holocene temperature records?
topic VDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Geofag: 450::Meteorologi: 453
topic_facet VDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Geofag: 450::Meteorologi: 453
url https://hdl.handle.net/10037/8449
https://doi.org/10.5194/esdd-6-1201-2015