Norge og EU : partnere i Arktis
This article raises three main questions: (i) What characterizes the EEC/EU's relationship to the Arctic? (ii) What issues/areas have caused problems for the EU in becoming a more relevant actor in the Arctic? (iii) To what degree has Norway been able to exert influence on the Union's ongo...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | Bokmål |
Published: |
University of Tromsø
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/4264 |
_version_ | 1829303674960084992 |
---|---|
author | Wegge, Njord |
author_facet | Wegge, Njord |
author_sort | Wegge, Njord |
collection | University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive |
description | This article raises three main questions: (i) What characterizes the EEC/EU's relationship to the Arctic? (ii) What issues/areas have caused problems for the EU in becoming a more relevant actor in the Arctic? (iii) To what degree has Norway been able to exert influence on the Union's ongoing Arctic policy development? By chronologically reviewing the EEC/EU's relationship to the Arctic the article demonstrates that the intensity and interest for the Northern region has varied dramatically from great interest to near ignorance. While the Greenlandic population in 1982, due to cultural and economic disputes, left the EEC, the Union's most recent challenges with respect to becoming a relevant actor in the Arctic has concerned disagreements with some of the Arctic states. These disputes have primarily included discord on 1. The Law of the seas' role in the Arctic, 2. the EU's desire to become a permanent observer in the Arctic Council and finally, 3. The EU's ban on seal products in the Common market. The article concludes by describing how Norway has been one, if not the most, important Arctic state for the Union, and that Norway has benefitted from a cooperative approach towards the EU. The cooperative approach has indirectly given Norway an opportunity to influence the outcome of the EU's Arctic policy. |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | Arctic Council Arctic Arktis Arktis* greenlandic |
genre_facet | Arctic Council Arctic Arktis Arktis* greenlandic |
geographic | Arctic Norway |
geographic_facet | Arctic Norway |
id | ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/4264 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | Norwegian (Bokmål) |
op_collection_id | ftunivtroemsoe |
op_relation | FRIDAID 925768 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/4264 |
op_rights | openAccess |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | University of Tromsø |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/4264 2025-04-13T14:12:25+00:00 Norge og EU : partnere i Arktis Wegge, Njord 2012 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/4264 nob nob University of Tromsø Universitetet i Tromsø FRIDAID 925768 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/4264 openAccess VDP::Social science: 200::Political science and organizational theory: 240::Comparative politics: 241 VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Statsvitenskap og organisasjonsteori: 240::Sammenlignende politikk: 241 Journal article Tidsskriftartikkel Peer reviewed 2012 ftunivtroemsoe 2025-03-14T05:17:56Z This article raises three main questions: (i) What characterizes the EEC/EU's relationship to the Arctic? (ii) What issues/areas have caused problems for the EU in becoming a more relevant actor in the Arctic? (iii) To what degree has Norway been able to exert influence on the Union's ongoing Arctic policy development? By chronologically reviewing the EEC/EU's relationship to the Arctic the article demonstrates that the intensity and interest for the Northern region has varied dramatically from great interest to near ignorance. While the Greenlandic population in 1982, due to cultural and economic disputes, left the EEC, the Union's most recent challenges with respect to becoming a relevant actor in the Arctic has concerned disagreements with some of the Arctic states. These disputes have primarily included discord on 1. The Law of the seas' role in the Arctic, 2. the EU's desire to become a permanent observer in the Arctic Council and finally, 3. The EU's ban on seal products in the Common market. The article concludes by describing how Norway has been one, if not the most, important Arctic state for the Union, and that Norway has benefitted from a cooperative approach towards the EU. The cooperative approach has indirectly given Norway an opportunity to influence the outcome of the EU's Arctic policy. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Council Arctic Arktis Arktis* greenlandic University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive Arctic Norway |
spellingShingle | VDP::Social science: 200::Political science and organizational theory: 240::Comparative politics: 241 VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Statsvitenskap og organisasjonsteori: 240::Sammenlignende politikk: 241 Wegge, Njord Norge og EU : partnere i Arktis |
title | Norge og EU : partnere i Arktis |
title_full | Norge og EU : partnere i Arktis |
title_fullStr | Norge og EU : partnere i Arktis |
title_full_unstemmed | Norge og EU : partnere i Arktis |
title_short | Norge og EU : partnere i Arktis |
title_sort | norge og eu : partnere i arktis |
topic | VDP::Social science: 200::Political science and organizational theory: 240::Comparative politics: 241 VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Statsvitenskap og organisasjonsteori: 240::Sammenlignende politikk: 241 |
topic_facet | VDP::Social science: 200::Political science and organizational theory: 240::Comparative politics: 241 VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Statsvitenskap og organisasjonsteori: 240::Sammenlignende politikk: 241 |
url | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/4264 |