Norge og EU : partnere i Arktis

This article raises three main questions: (i) What characterizes the EEC/EU's relationship to the Arctic? (ii) What issues/areas have caused problems for the EU in becoming a more relevant actor in the Arctic? (iii) To what degree has Norway been able to exert influence on the Union's ongo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wegge, Njord
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:Bokmål
Published: University of Tromsø 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10037/4264
_version_ 1829303674960084992
author Wegge, Njord
author_facet Wegge, Njord
author_sort Wegge, Njord
collection University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive
description This article raises three main questions: (i) What characterizes the EEC/EU's relationship to the Arctic? (ii) What issues/areas have caused problems for the EU in becoming a more relevant actor in the Arctic? (iii) To what degree has Norway been able to exert influence on the Union's ongoing Arctic policy development? By chronologically reviewing the EEC/EU's relationship to the Arctic the article demonstrates that the intensity and interest for the Northern region has varied dramatically from great interest to near ignorance. While the Greenlandic population in 1982, due to cultural and economic disputes, left the EEC, the Union's most recent challenges with respect to becoming a relevant actor in the Arctic has concerned disagreements with some of the Arctic states. These disputes have primarily included discord on 1. The Law of the seas' role in the Arctic, 2. the EU's desire to become a permanent observer in the Arctic Council and finally, 3. The EU's ban on seal products in the Common market. The article concludes by describing how Norway has been one, if not the most, important Arctic state for the Union, and that Norway has benefitted from a cooperative approach towards the EU. The cooperative approach has indirectly given Norway an opportunity to influence the outcome of the EU's Arctic policy.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Arctic Council
Arctic
Arktis
Arktis*
greenlandic
genre_facet Arctic Council
Arctic
Arktis
Arktis*
greenlandic
geographic Arctic
Norway
geographic_facet Arctic
Norway
id ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/4264
institution Open Polar
language Norwegian (Bokmål)
op_collection_id ftunivtroemsoe
op_relation FRIDAID 925768
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/4264
op_rights openAccess
publishDate 2012
publisher University of Tromsø
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/4264 2025-04-13T14:12:25+00:00 Norge og EU : partnere i Arktis Wegge, Njord 2012 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/4264 nob nob University of Tromsø Universitetet i Tromsø FRIDAID 925768 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/4264 openAccess VDP::Social science: 200::Political science and organizational theory: 240::Comparative politics: 241 VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Statsvitenskap og organisasjonsteori: 240::Sammenlignende politikk: 241 Journal article Tidsskriftartikkel Peer reviewed 2012 ftunivtroemsoe 2025-03-14T05:17:56Z This article raises three main questions: (i) What characterizes the EEC/EU's relationship to the Arctic? (ii) What issues/areas have caused problems for the EU in becoming a more relevant actor in the Arctic? (iii) To what degree has Norway been able to exert influence on the Union's ongoing Arctic policy development? By chronologically reviewing the EEC/EU's relationship to the Arctic the article demonstrates that the intensity and interest for the Northern region has varied dramatically from great interest to near ignorance. While the Greenlandic population in 1982, due to cultural and economic disputes, left the EEC, the Union's most recent challenges with respect to becoming a relevant actor in the Arctic has concerned disagreements with some of the Arctic states. These disputes have primarily included discord on 1. The Law of the seas' role in the Arctic, 2. the EU's desire to become a permanent observer in the Arctic Council and finally, 3. The EU's ban on seal products in the Common market. The article concludes by describing how Norway has been one, if not the most, important Arctic state for the Union, and that Norway has benefitted from a cooperative approach towards the EU. The cooperative approach has indirectly given Norway an opportunity to influence the outcome of the EU's Arctic policy. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Council Arctic Arktis Arktis* greenlandic University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive Arctic Norway
spellingShingle VDP::Social science: 200::Political science and organizational theory: 240::Comparative politics: 241
VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Statsvitenskap og organisasjonsteori: 240::Sammenlignende politikk: 241
Wegge, Njord
Norge og EU : partnere i Arktis
title Norge og EU : partnere i Arktis
title_full Norge og EU : partnere i Arktis
title_fullStr Norge og EU : partnere i Arktis
title_full_unstemmed Norge og EU : partnere i Arktis
title_short Norge og EU : partnere i Arktis
title_sort norge og eu : partnere i arktis
topic VDP::Social science: 200::Political science and organizational theory: 240::Comparative politics: 241
VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Statsvitenskap og organisasjonsteori: 240::Sammenlignende politikk: 241
topic_facet VDP::Social science: 200::Political science and organizational theory: 240::Comparative politics: 241
VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Statsvitenskap og organisasjonsteori: 240::Sammenlignende politikk: 241
url https://hdl.handle.net/10037/4264