Comparison of numerical wind modelling on hectometric and km scales at Kvitfjell wind power plant

Evaluating the performance of numerical weather models (NWMs) is crucial to identify the best choice of model for wind resource assessments. This thesis has investigated how well NWMs with different horizontal resolutions reproduced the wind directions, the wind speeds and the associated power produ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rein, Kristine
Format: Master Thesis
Language:English
Published: UiT The Arctic University of Norway 2023
Subjects:
WRF
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10037/30101
id ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/30101
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/30101 2023-09-05T13:19:25+02:00 Comparison of numerical wind modelling on hectometric and km scales at Kvitfjell wind power plant Rein, Kristine 2023-06-01 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/30101 eng eng UiT The Arctic University of Norway UiT Norges arktiske universitet https://hdl.handle.net/10037/30101 Copyright 2023 The Author(s) WRF NORA3 AROME Numerical weather model Complex terrain Wind verification Grid resolution EOM-3901 Master thesis Mastergradsoppgave 2023 ftunivtroemsoe 2023-08-23T23:07:15Z Evaluating the performance of numerical weather models (NWMs) is crucial to identify the best choice of model for wind resource assessments. This thesis has investigated how well NWMs with different horizontal resolutions reproduced the wind directions, the wind speeds and the associated power production at a wind power plant located in complex terrain. The evaluated models included NORA3, WRF1km, and AROME Troms and Finnmark (ATF300m) throughout the 9 months from January to September 2022, as well as WRF111m for some case studies of shorter duration. The models were evaluated by comparing the simulations’ results to hub-height wind measurements. ATF300m outperformed the other models in terms of lower errors when considering the time period as a whole, and also for a case with wind directions similar to the main wind direction registered for the park. This could be as a result of the better topographic representation by the model, thereby including terrain induced effects on the wind more accurately such as orographic blocking. However, NORA3 outperformed the other models in terms of lower errors for two cases with wind directions coming from the NW sector. These results may suggest that 3 km grid spacing gives a sufficient representation of the wind fields when the wind is coming from the open ocean and is less influenced by the terrain before entering the park. Another suggestion may be that the coarser spatial resolution of NORA3 provides lower simulated wind speeds which counteracts the overestimation related to the absence of a wind farm parameterization. Master Thesis Finnmark Finnmark Troms University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive
institution Open Polar
collection University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftunivtroemsoe
language English
topic WRF
NORA3
AROME
Numerical weather model
Complex terrain
Wind verification
Grid resolution
EOM-3901
spellingShingle WRF
NORA3
AROME
Numerical weather model
Complex terrain
Wind verification
Grid resolution
EOM-3901
Rein, Kristine
Comparison of numerical wind modelling on hectometric and km scales at Kvitfjell wind power plant
topic_facet WRF
NORA3
AROME
Numerical weather model
Complex terrain
Wind verification
Grid resolution
EOM-3901
description Evaluating the performance of numerical weather models (NWMs) is crucial to identify the best choice of model for wind resource assessments. This thesis has investigated how well NWMs with different horizontal resolutions reproduced the wind directions, the wind speeds and the associated power production at a wind power plant located in complex terrain. The evaluated models included NORA3, WRF1km, and AROME Troms and Finnmark (ATF300m) throughout the 9 months from January to September 2022, as well as WRF111m for some case studies of shorter duration. The models were evaluated by comparing the simulations’ results to hub-height wind measurements. ATF300m outperformed the other models in terms of lower errors when considering the time period as a whole, and also for a case with wind directions similar to the main wind direction registered for the park. This could be as a result of the better topographic representation by the model, thereby including terrain induced effects on the wind more accurately such as orographic blocking. However, NORA3 outperformed the other models in terms of lower errors for two cases with wind directions coming from the NW sector. These results may suggest that 3 km grid spacing gives a sufficient representation of the wind fields when the wind is coming from the open ocean and is less influenced by the terrain before entering the park. Another suggestion may be that the coarser spatial resolution of NORA3 provides lower simulated wind speeds which counteracts the overestimation related to the absence of a wind farm parameterization.
format Master Thesis
author Rein, Kristine
author_facet Rein, Kristine
author_sort Rein, Kristine
title Comparison of numerical wind modelling on hectometric and km scales at Kvitfjell wind power plant
title_short Comparison of numerical wind modelling on hectometric and km scales at Kvitfjell wind power plant
title_full Comparison of numerical wind modelling on hectometric and km scales at Kvitfjell wind power plant
title_fullStr Comparison of numerical wind modelling on hectometric and km scales at Kvitfjell wind power plant
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of numerical wind modelling on hectometric and km scales at Kvitfjell wind power plant
title_sort comparison of numerical wind modelling on hectometric and km scales at kvitfjell wind power plant
publisher UiT The Arctic University of Norway
publishDate 2023
url https://hdl.handle.net/10037/30101
genre Finnmark
Finnmark
Troms
genre_facet Finnmark
Finnmark
Troms
op_relation https://hdl.handle.net/10037/30101
op_rights Copyright 2023 The Author(s)
_version_ 1776200190755078144