How Many Reindeer? UAV Surveys as an Alternative to Helicopter or Ground Surveys for Estimating Population Abundance in Open Landscapes

Conservation of wildlife depends on precise and unbiased knowledge on the abundance and distribution of species. It is challenging to choose appropriate methods to obtain a sufficiently high detectability and spatial coverage matching the species characteristics and spatiotemporal use of the landsca...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote Sensing
Main Authors: Paulsen, Ingrid M., Pedersen, Åshild Ø, Hann, Richard, Blanchet, Marie-Anne, Eischeid, Isabell, van Hazendonk, Charlotte Maartje, Ravolainen, Virve, Stien, Audun, Le Moullec, Mathilde
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10037/28486
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15010009
id ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/28486
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/28486 2023-05-15T15:07:17+02:00 How Many Reindeer? UAV Surveys as an Alternative to Helicopter or Ground Surveys for Estimating Population Abundance in Open Landscapes Paulsen, Ingrid M. Pedersen, Åshild Ø Hann, Richard Blanchet, Marie-Anne Eischeid, Isabell van Hazendonk, Charlotte Maartje Ravolainen, Virve Stien, Audun Le Moullec, Mathilde 2022-12-20 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/28486 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15010009 eng eng MDPI Remote Sensing https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/1/9 Paulsen IM, Pedersen ÅØ, Hann R, Blanchet ME, Eischeid I, van Hazendonk CM, Ravolainen V, Stien A, Le Moullec M. How Many Reindeer? UAV Surveys as an Alternative to Helicopter or Ground Surveys for Estimating Population Abundance in Open Landscapes. Remote Sensing. 2023;15(9) FRIDAID 2107909 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15010009 2072-4292 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/28486 Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) openAccess Copyright 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 CC-BY Journal article Tidsskriftartikkel Peer reviewed publishedVersion 2022 ftunivtroemsoe https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15010009 2023-02-09T00:03:55Z Conservation of wildlife depends on precise and unbiased knowledge on the abundance and distribution of species. It is challenging to choose appropriate methods to obtain a sufficiently high detectability and spatial coverage matching the species characteristics and spatiotemporal use of the landscape. In remote regions, such as in the Arctic, monitoring efforts are often resource-intensive and there is a need for cheap and precise alternative methods. Here, we compare an uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV; quadcopter) pilot survey of the non-gregarious Svalbard reindeer to traditional population abundance surveys from ground and helicopter to investigate whether UAVs can be an efficient alternative technology. We found that the UAV survey underestimated reindeer abundance compared to the traditional abundance surveys when used at management relevant spatial scales. Observer variation in reindeer detection on UAV imagery was influenced by the RGB greenness index and mean blue channel. In future studies, we suggest testing long-range fixed-wing UAVs to increase the sample size of reindeer and area coverage and incorporate detection probability in animal density models from UAV imagery. In addition, we encourage focus on more efficient post-processing techniques, including automatic animal object identification with machine learning and analytical methods that account for uncertainties. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Svalbard svalbard reindeer University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive Arctic Svalbard Remote Sensing 15 1 9
institution Open Polar
collection University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftunivtroemsoe
language English
description Conservation of wildlife depends on precise and unbiased knowledge on the abundance and distribution of species. It is challenging to choose appropriate methods to obtain a sufficiently high detectability and spatial coverage matching the species characteristics and spatiotemporal use of the landscape. In remote regions, such as in the Arctic, monitoring efforts are often resource-intensive and there is a need for cheap and precise alternative methods. Here, we compare an uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV; quadcopter) pilot survey of the non-gregarious Svalbard reindeer to traditional population abundance surveys from ground and helicopter to investigate whether UAVs can be an efficient alternative technology. We found that the UAV survey underestimated reindeer abundance compared to the traditional abundance surveys when used at management relevant spatial scales. Observer variation in reindeer detection on UAV imagery was influenced by the RGB greenness index and mean blue channel. In future studies, we suggest testing long-range fixed-wing UAVs to increase the sample size of reindeer and area coverage and incorporate detection probability in animal density models from UAV imagery. In addition, we encourage focus on more efficient post-processing techniques, including automatic animal object identification with machine learning and analytical methods that account for uncertainties.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Paulsen, Ingrid M.
Pedersen, Åshild Ø
Hann, Richard
Blanchet, Marie-Anne
Eischeid, Isabell
van Hazendonk, Charlotte Maartje
Ravolainen, Virve
Stien, Audun
Le Moullec, Mathilde
spellingShingle Paulsen, Ingrid M.
Pedersen, Åshild Ø
Hann, Richard
Blanchet, Marie-Anne
Eischeid, Isabell
van Hazendonk, Charlotte Maartje
Ravolainen, Virve
Stien, Audun
Le Moullec, Mathilde
How Many Reindeer? UAV Surveys as an Alternative to Helicopter or Ground Surveys for Estimating Population Abundance in Open Landscapes
author_facet Paulsen, Ingrid M.
Pedersen, Åshild Ø
Hann, Richard
Blanchet, Marie-Anne
Eischeid, Isabell
van Hazendonk, Charlotte Maartje
Ravolainen, Virve
Stien, Audun
Le Moullec, Mathilde
author_sort Paulsen, Ingrid M.
title How Many Reindeer? UAV Surveys as an Alternative to Helicopter or Ground Surveys for Estimating Population Abundance in Open Landscapes
title_short How Many Reindeer? UAV Surveys as an Alternative to Helicopter or Ground Surveys for Estimating Population Abundance in Open Landscapes
title_full How Many Reindeer? UAV Surveys as an Alternative to Helicopter or Ground Surveys for Estimating Population Abundance in Open Landscapes
title_fullStr How Many Reindeer? UAV Surveys as an Alternative to Helicopter or Ground Surveys for Estimating Population Abundance in Open Landscapes
title_full_unstemmed How Many Reindeer? UAV Surveys as an Alternative to Helicopter or Ground Surveys for Estimating Population Abundance in Open Landscapes
title_sort how many reindeer? uav surveys as an alternative to helicopter or ground surveys for estimating population abundance in open landscapes
publisher MDPI
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/10037/28486
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15010009
geographic Arctic
Svalbard
geographic_facet Arctic
Svalbard
genre Arctic
Svalbard
svalbard reindeer
genre_facet Arctic
Svalbard
svalbard reindeer
op_relation Remote Sensing
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/1/9
Paulsen IM, Pedersen ÅØ, Hann R, Blanchet ME, Eischeid I, van Hazendonk CM, Ravolainen V, Stien A, Le Moullec M. How Many Reindeer? UAV Surveys as an Alternative to Helicopter or Ground Surveys for Estimating Population Abundance in Open Landscapes. Remote Sensing. 2023;15(9)
FRIDAID 2107909
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15010009
2072-4292
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/28486
op_rights Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
openAccess
Copyright 2022 The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15010009
container_title Remote Sensing
container_volume 15
container_issue 1
container_start_page 9
_version_ 1766338828018122752