Comparison of Deep Learning Models for the Classification of Noctilucent Cloud Images

Optically thin layers of tiny ice particles near the summer mesopause, known as noctilucent clouds, are of significant interest within the aeronomy and climate science communities. Groundbased optical cameras mounted at various locations in the arctic regions collect the dataset during favorable sum...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote Sensing
Main Authors: Sapkota, Rajendra, Sharma, Puneet, Mann, Ingrid
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10037/27344
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102306
id ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/27344
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/27344 2023-05-15T15:06:15+02:00 Comparison of Deep Learning Models for the Classification of Noctilucent Cloud Images Sapkota, Rajendra Sharma, Puneet Mann, Ingrid 2022-05-10 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/27344 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102306 eng eng MDPI Remote Sensing Sapkota, Sharma, Mann. Comparison of Deep Learning Models for the Classification of Noctilucent Cloud Images. Remote Sensing. 2022;14(10) FRIDAID 2045685 doi:10.3390/rs14102306 2072-4292 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/27344 Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) openAccess Copyright 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 CC-BY Journal article Tidsskriftartikkel Peer reviewed publishedVersion 2022 ftunivtroemsoe https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102306 2022-11-17T00:01:31Z Optically thin layers of tiny ice particles near the summer mesopause, known as noctilucent clouds, are of significant interest within the aeronomy and climate science communities. Groundbased optical cameras mounted at various locations in the arctic regions collect the dataset during favorable summer times. In this paper, first, we compare the performances of various deep learningbased image classifiers against a baseline machine learning model trained with support vector machine (SVM) algorithm to identify an effective and lightweight model for the classification of noctilucent clouds. The SVM classifier is trained with histogram of oriented gradient (HOG) features, and deep learning models such as SqueezeNet, ShuffleNet, MobileNet, and Resnet are fine-tuned based on the dataset. The dataset includes images observed from different locations in northern Europe with varied weather conditions. Second, we investigate the most informative pixels for the classification decision on test images. The pixel-level attributions calculated using the guide back-propagation algorithm are visualized as saliency maps. Our results indicate that the SqueezeNet model achieves an F1 score of 0.95. In addition, SqueezeNet is the lightest model used in our experiments, and the saliency maps obtained for a set of test images correspond better with relevant regions associated with noctilucent clouds. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive Arctic Remote Sensing 14 10 2306
institution Open Polar
collection University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftunivtroemsoe
language English
description Optically thin layers of tiny ice particles near the summer mesopause, known as noctilucent clouds, are of significant interest within the aeronomy and climate science communities. Groundbased optical cameras mounted at various locations in the arctic regions collect the dataset during favorable summer times. In this paper, first, we compare the performances of various deep learningbased image classifiers against a baseline machine learning model trained with support vector machine (SVM) algorithm to identify an effective and lightweight model for the classification of noctilucent clouds. The SVM classifier is trained with histogram of oriented gradient (HOG) features, and deep learning models such as SqueezeNet, ShuffleNet, MobileNet, and Resnet are fine-tuned based on the dataset. The dataset includes images observed from different locations in northern Europe with varied weather conditions. Second, we investigate the most informative pixels for the classification decision on test images. The pixel-level attributions calculated using the guide back-propagation algorithm are visualized as saliency maps. Our results indicate that the SqueezeNet model achieves an F1 score of 0.95. In addition, SqueezeNet is the lightest model used in our experiments, and the saliency maps obtained for a set of test images correspond better with relevant regions associated with noctilucent clouds.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Sapkota, Rajendra
Sharma, Puneet
Mann, Ingrid
spellingShingle Sapkota, Rajendra
Sharma, Puneet
Mann, Ingrid
Comparison of Deep Learning Models for the Classification of Noctilucent Cloud Images
author_facet Sapkota, Rajendra
Sharma, Puneet
Mann, Ingrid
author_sort Sapkota, Rajendra
title Comparison of Deep Learning Models for the Classification of Noctilucent Cloud Images
title_short Comparison of Deep Learning Models for the Classification of Noctilucent Cloud Images
title_full Comparison of Deep Learning Models for the Classification of Noctilucent Cloud Images
title_fullStr Comparison of Deep Learning Models for the Classification of Noctilucent Cloud Images
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Deep Learning Models for the Classification of Noctilucent Cloud Images
title_sort comparison of deep learning models for the classification of noctilucent cloud images
publisher MDPI
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/10037/27344
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102306
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation Remote Sensing
Sapkota, Sharma, Mann. Comparison of Deep Learning Models for the Classification of Noctilucent Cloud Images. Remote Sensing. 2022;14(10)
FRIDAID 2045685
doi:10.3390/rs14102306
2072-4292
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/27344
op_rights Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
openAccess
Copyright 2022 The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102306
container_title Remote Sensing
container_volume 14
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2306
_version_ 1766337901113638912