Why are Svalbard Arctic foxes Brucella spp. seronegative?

Arctic foxes (Vulpes lagopus) are susceptible to smooth Brucella (s-Brucella) infection and may be exposed to such bacteria through the consumption of infected marine mammals, as implied by the finding of s-Brucella antibodies in polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Arctic foxes in Svalbard have not previ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Research
Main Authors: Nymo, Ingebjørg Helena, Fuglei, Eva, Mørk, Torill, Breines, Eva Marie, Holmgren, Karin Elisabeth, Davidson, Rebecca K., Tryland, Morten
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Norwegian Polar Institute 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10037/27286
https://doi.org/10.33265/polar.v41.7867
id ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/27286
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/27286 2023-05-15T14:23:49+02:00 Why are Svalbard Arctic foxes Brucella spp. seronegative? Nymo, Ingebjørg Helena Fuglei, Eva Mørk, Torill Breines, Eva Marie Holmgren, Karin Elisabeth Davidson, Rebecca K. Tryland, Morten 2022-07-06 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/27286 https://doi.org/10.33265/polar.v41.7867 eng eng Norwegian Polar Institute Polar Research Nymo, Fuglei, Mørk, Breines, Holmgren, Davidson, Tryland. Why are Svalbard Arctic foxes Brucella spp. seronegative?. Polar Research. 2022;41 FRIDAID 2050360 doi:10.33265/polar.v41.7867 0800-0395 1751-8369 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/27286 Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) openAccess Copyright 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 CC-BY-NC Journal article Tidsskriftartikkel publishedVersion 2022 ftunivtroemsoe https://doi.org/10.33265/polar.v41.7867 2022-11-10T00:01:31Z Arctic foxes (Vulpes lagopus) are susceptible to smooth Brucella (s-Brucella) infection and may be exposed to such bacteria through the consumption of infected marine mammals, as implied by the finding of s-Brucella antibodies in polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Arctic foxes in Svalbard have not previously been investigated for s-Brucella antibodies, but such antibodies have been detected in Arctic foxes in Iceland, Alaska (USA) and Russia. We investigated blood from Svalbard Arctic foxes for s-Brucella antibodies using an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA). The animals (0–13 years old) were either caught by fur trappers (1995–2003, n = 403) or found dead (1995 and 2003, n = 3). No seropositive animals were detected. Morbidity and mortality due to the infection cannot be ruled out. However, no known, large disease outbreaks of unknown aetiology have been reported. Furthermore, it is unlikely that the Svalbard Arctic fox is resistant to infection as Arctic foxes from other populations are susceptible, and there is circumpolar connectivity between populations. The discrepancy between the findings in Iceland and Svalbard is surprising as both populations are on islands with no known local sources of exposure to s-Brucella other than marine mammals. However, our negative findings suggest that marine mammals may not be a major source of infection for this species. Comparative investigations are needed in order to draw conclusions regarding the epizootiology of s-Brucella in Arctic foxes in Svalbard and Iceland. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Fox Arctic Iceland Polar Research Svalbard Ursus maritimus Vulpes lagopus Alaska University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive Arctic Svalbard Polar Research 41
institution Open Polar
collection University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftunivtroemsoe
language English
description Arctic foxes (Vulpes lagopus) are susceptible to smooth Brucella (s-Brucella) infection and may be exposed to such bacteria through the consumption of infected marine mammals, as implied by the finding of s-Brucella antibodies in polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Arctic foxes in Svalbard have not previously been investigated for s-Brucella antibodies, but such antibodies have been detected in Arctic foxes in Iceland, Alaska (USA) and Russia. We investigated blood from Svalbard Arctic foxes for s-Brucella antibodies using an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA). The animals (0–13 years old) were either caught by fur trappers (1995–2003, n = 403) or found dead (1995 and 2003, n = 3). No seropositive animals were detected. Morbidity and mortality due to the infection cannot be ruled out. However, no known, large disease outbreaks of unknown aetiology have been reported. Furthermore, it is unlikely that the Svalbard Arctic fox is resistant to infection as Arctic foxes from other populations are susceptible, and there is circumpolar connectivity between populations. The discrepancy between the findings in Iceland and Svalbard is surprising as both populations are on islands with no known local sources of exposure to s-Brucella other than marine mammals. However, our negative findings suggest that marine mammals may not be a major source of infection for this species. Comparative investigations are needed in order to draw conclusions regarding the epizootiology of s-Brucella in Arctic foxes in Svalbard and Iceland.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Nymo, Ingebjørg Helena
Fuglei, Eva
Mørk, Torill
Breines, Eva Marie
Holmgren, Karin Elisabeth
Davidson, Rebecca K.
Tryland, Morten
spellingShingle Nymo, Ingebjørg Helena
Fuglei, Eva
Mørk, Torill
Breines, Eva Marie
Holmgren, Karin Elisabeth
Davidson, Rebecca K.
Tryland, Morten
Why are Svalbard Arctic foxes Brucella spp. seronegative?
author_facet Nymo, Ingebjørg Helena
Fuglei, Eva
Mørk, Torill
Breines, Eva Marie
Holmgren, Karin Elisabeth
Davidson, Rebecca K.
Tryland, Morten
author_sort Nymo, Ingebjørg Helena
title Why are Svalbard Arctic foxes Brucella spp. seronegative?
title_short Why are Svalbard Arctic foxes Brucella spp. seronegative?
title_full Why are Svalbard Arctic foxes Brucella spp. seronegative?
title_fullStr Why are Svalbard Arctic foxes Brucella spp. seronegative?
title_full_unstemmed Why are Svalbard Arctic foxes Brucella spp. seronegative?
title_sort why are svalbard arctic foxes brucella spp. seronegative?
publisher Norwegian Polar Institute
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/10037/27286
https://doi.org/10.33265/polar.v41.7867
geographic Arctic
Svalbard
geographic_facet Arctic
Svalbard
genre Arctic
Arctic Fox
Arctic
Iceland
Polar Research
Svalbard
Ursus maritimus
Vulpes lagopus
Alaska
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic Fox
Arctic
Iceland
Polar Research
Svalbard
Ursus maritimus
Vulpes lagopus
Alaska
op_relation Polar Research
Nymo, Fuglei, Mørk, Breines, Holmgren, Davidson, Tryland. Why are Svalbard Arctic foxes Brucella spp. seronegative?. Polar Research. 2022;41
FRIDAID 2050360
doi:10.33265/polar.v41.7867
0800-0395
1751-8369
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/27286
op_rights Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
openAccess
Copyright 2022 The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY-NC
op_doi https://doi.org/10.33265/polar.v41.7867
container_title Polar Research
container_volume 41
_version_ 1766296297521807360