Comparison of the efficiency and modes of capture of biodegradable versus nylon gillnets in the Northeast Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) fishery

Modern gillnets are usually made of nylon with high breaking strength, suitable elasticity and durability making them an efficient fishing gear. Lost, abandoned, or discarded gillnets at sea cause plastic pollution and can continue capturing marine animals over long periods of time. Biodegradable ma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine Pollution Bulletin
Main Authors: Cerbule, Kristine, Herrmann, Bent, Grimaldo, Eduardo, Larsen, Roger B., Savina, Esther, Vollstad, Jørgen
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10037/26388
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113618
id ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/26388
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/26388 2023-05-15T15:27:27+02:00 Comparison of the efficiency and modes of capture of biodegradable versus nylon gillnets in the Northeast Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) fishery Cerbule, Kristine Herrmann, Bent Grimaldo, Eduardo Larsen, Roger B. Savina, Esther Vollstad, Jørgen 2022-04-01 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/26388 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113618 eng eng Elsevier Marine Pollution Bulletin Cerbule, Herrmann, Grimaldo, Larsen, Savina, Vollstad. Comparison of the efficiency and modes of capture of biodegradable versus nylon gillnets in the Northeast Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) fishery. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2022;178:1-12 FRIDAID 2018865 doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113618 0025-326X 1879-3363 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/26388 openAccess Copyright 2022 The Author(s) Journal article Tidsskriftartikkel Peer reviewed publishedVersion 2022 ftunivtroemsoe https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113618 2022-08-24T23:00:00Z Modern gillnets are usually made of nylon with high breaking strength, suitable elasticity and durability making them an efficient fishing gear. Lost, abandoned, or discarded gillnets at sea cause plastic pollution and can continue capturing marine animals over long periods of time. Biodegradable materials are being developed to replace nylon in gillnets. However, biodegradable gillnets have shown reduced catch efficiency compared to the nylon gillnets which challenges their acceptance by the fishing sector. This study investigated catch efficiency and modes of capture between biodegradable and nylon gillnets in commercial cod (Gadus morhua) fishery. On average, new biodegradable gillnets caught 25% fewer cod compared to new nylon gillnets. The main capture modes were by the gills and by the body in used and new biodegradable gillnets, respectively. Differences in catch efficiency are related to specific modes of capture that may be related to differences in material properties. Article in Journal/Newspaper atlantic cod Gadus morhua Northeast Atlantic University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive Marine Pollution Bulletin 178 113618
institution Open Polar
collection University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftunivtroemsoe
language English
description Modern gillnets are usually made of nylon with high breaking strength, suitable elasticity and durability making them an efficient fishing gear. Lost, abandoned, or discarded gillnets at sea cause plastic pollution and can continue capturing marine animals over long periods of time. Biodegradable materials are being developed to replace nylon in gillnets. However, biodegradable gillnets have shown reduced catch efficiency compared to the nylon gillnets which challenges their acceptance by the fishing sector. This study investigated catch efficiency and modes of capture between biodegradable and nylon gillnets in commercial cod (Gadus morhua) fishery. On average, new biodegradable gillnets caught 25% fewer cod compared to new nylon gillnets. The main capture modes were by the gills and by the body in used and new biodegradable gillnets, respectively. Differences in catch efficiency are related to specific modes of capture that may be related to differences in material properties.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Cerbule, Kristine
Herrmann, Bent
Grimaldo, Eduardo
Larsen, Roger B.
Savina, Esther
Vollstad, Jørgen
spellingShingle Cerbule, Kristine
Herrmann, Bent
Grimaldo, Eduardo
Larsen, Roger B.
Savina, Esther
Vollstad, Jørgen
Comparison of the efficiency and modes of capture of biodegradable versus nylon gillnets in the Northeast Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) fishery
author_facet Cerbule, Kristine
Herrmann, Bent
Grimaldo, Eduardo
Larsen, Roger B.
Savina, Esther
Vollstad, Jørgen
author_sort Cerbule, Kristine
title Comparison of the efficiency and modes of capture of biodegradable versus nylon gillnets in the Northeast Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) fishery
title_short Comparison of the efficiency and modes of capture of biodegradable versus nylon gillnets in the Northeast Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) fishery
title_full Comparison of the efficiency and modes of capture of biodegradable versus nylon gillnets in the Northeast Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) fishery
title_fullStr Comparison of the efficiency and modes of capture of biodegradable versus nylon gillnets in the Northeast Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) fishery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the efficiency and modes of capture of biodegradable versus nylon gillnets in the Northeast Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) fishery
title_sort comparison of the efficiency and modes of capture of biodegradable versus nylon gillnets in the northeast atlantic cod (gadus morhua) fishery
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/10037/26388
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113618
genre atlantic cod
Gadus morhua
Northeast Atlantic
genre_facet atlantic cod
Gadus morhua
Northeast Atlantic
op_relation Marine Pollution Bulletin
Cerbule, Herrmann, Grimaldo, Larsen, Savina, Vollstad. Comparison of the efficiency and modes of capture of biodegradable versus nylon gillnets in the Northeast Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) fishery. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2022;178:1-12
FRIDAID 2018865
doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113618
0025-326X
1879-3363
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/26388
op_rights openAccess
Copyright 2022 The Author(s)
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113618
container_title Marine Pollution Bulletin
container_volume 178
container_start_page 113618
_version_ 1766357889423769600