Resilience, Reliability, and Recoverability (3Rs)
Recent natural and human-made disasters, mortgage derivatives crises, and the need for stable systems in different areas have renewed interest in the concept of resilience, especially as it relates to complex industrial systems with mechanical failures. This concept in the engineering systems (infra...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Master Thesis |
Language: | English |
Published: |
UiT The Arctic University of Norway
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/25358 |
id |
ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/25358 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/25358 2023-05-15T15:12:31+02:00 Resilience, Reliability, and Recoverability (3Rs) Jheeta, Manjit Singh 2022-01-06 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/25358 eng eng UiT The Arctic University of Norway UiT Norges arktiske universitet https://hdl.handle.net/10037/25358 Copyright 2022 The Author(s) Teknologi Safety TEK-3901 Master thesis Mastergradsoppgave 2022 ftunivtroemsoe 2022-06-08T22:58:57Z Recent natural and human-made disasters, mortgage derivatives crises, and the need for stable systems in different areas have renewed interest in the concept of resilience, especially as it relates to complex industrial systems with mechanical failures. This concept in the engineering systems (infrastructure) domain could be interpreted as the probability that system conditions exceed an irrevocable tipping point. But the probability in this subject covers the different areas that different approaches and indicators can evaluate. In this context, reliability engineering is used the reliability (uptime) and recoverability (downtime) indicators (or performance indicators) as the most useful probabilistic tools for performance measurement. Therefore, our research penalty area is the resilience concept in combination with reliability and recoverability. It must be said that the resilience evaluators must be considering a diversity of knowledge sources. In this thesis, the literature review points to several important implications for understanding and applying resilience in the engineering area and The Arctic condition. Indeed, we try to understand the application and interaction of different performance-based resilience concepts. In this way, a collection of the most popular performance-based resilience analysis methods with an engineering perspective is added as a state-of-the-art review. The performance indicators studies reveal that operational conditions significantly affect the components, industry activities, and infrastructures performance in various ways. These influential factors (or heterogeneity) can broadly be studied into two groups: observable and unobservable risk factors in probability analysis of system performance. The covariate-based models (regression), such as proportional hazard models (PHM), and their extent are the most popular methods for quantifying observable and unobservable risk factors. The report is organized as follows: After a brief introduction of resilience, chapters 2,3 priorly ... Master Thesis Arctic University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive Arctic |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive |
op_collection_id |
ftunivtroemsoe |
language |
English |
topic |
Teknologi Safety TEK-3901 |
spellingShingle |
Teknologi Safety TEK-3901 Jheeta, Manjit Singh Resilience, Reliability, and Recoverability (3Rs) |
topic_facet |
Teknologi Safety TEK-3901 |
description |
Recent natural and human-made disasters, mortgage derivatives crises, and the need for stable systems in different areas have renewed interest in the concept of resilience, especially as it relates to complex industrial systems with mechanical failures. This concept in the engineering systems (infrastructure) domain could be interpreted as the probability that system conditions exceed an irrevocable tipping point. But the probability in this subject covers the different areas that different approaches and indicators can evaluate. In this context, reliability engineering is used the reliability (uptime) and recoverability (downtime) indicators (or performance indicators) as the most useful probabilistic tools for performance measurement. Therefore, our research penalty area is the resilience concept in combination with reliability and recoverability. It must be said that the resilience evaluators must be considering a diversity of knowledge sources. In this thesis, the literature review points to several important implications for understanding and applying resilience in the engineering area and The Arctic condition. Indeed, we try to understand the application and interaction of different performance-based resilience concepts. In this way, a collection of the most popular performance-based resilience analysis methods with an engineering perspective is added as a state-of-the-art review. The performance indicators studies reveal that operational conditions significantly affect the components, industry activities, and infrastructures performance in various ways. These influential factors (or heterogeneity) can broadly be studied into two groups: observable and unobservable risk factors in probability analysis of system performance. The covariate-based models (regression), such as proportional hazard models (PHM), and their extent are the most popular methods for quantifying observable and unobservable risk factors. The report is organized as follows: After a brief introduction of resilience, chapters 2,3 priorly ... |
format |
Master Thesis |
author |
Jheeta, Manjit Singh |
author_facet |
Jheeta, Manjit Singh |
author_sort |
Jheeta, Manjit Singh |
title |
Resilience, Reliability, and Recoverability (3Rs) |
title_short |
Resilience, Reliability, and Recoverability (3Rs) |
title_full |
Resilience, Reliability, and Recoverability (3Rs) |
title_fullStr |
Resilience, Reliability, and Recoverability (3Rs) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Resilience, Reliability, and Recoverability (3Rs) |
title_sort |
resilience, reliability, and recoverability (3rs) |
publisher |
UiT The Arctic University of Norway |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/25358 |
geographic |
Arctic |
geographic_facet |
Arctic |
genre |
Arctic |
genre_facet |
Arctic |
op_relation |
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/25358 |
op_rights |
Copyright 2022 The Author(s) |
_version_ |
1766343181774880768 |