Resilience, Reliability, and Recoverability (3Rs)

Recent natural and human-made disasters, mortgage derivatives crises, and the need for stable systems in different areas have renewed interest in the concept of resilience, especially as it relates to complex industrial systems with mechanical failures. This concept in the engineering systems (infra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jheeta, Manjit Singh
Format: Master Thesis
Language:English
Published: UiT The Arctic University of Norway 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10037/25358
id ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/25358
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/25358 2023-05-15T15:12:31+02:00 Resilience, Reliability, and Recoverability (3Rs) Jheeta, Manjit Singh 2022-01-06 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/25358 eng eng UiT The Arctic University of Norway UiT Norges arktiske universitet https://hdl.handle.net/10037/25358 Copyright 2022 The Author(s) Teknologi Safety TEK-3901 Master thesis Mastergradsoppgave 2022 ftunivtroemsoe 2022-06-08T22:58:57Z Recent natural and human-made disasters, mortgage derivatives crises, and the need for stable systems in different areas have renewed interest in the concept of resilience, especially as it relates to complex industrial systems with mechanical failures. This concept in the engineering systems (infrastructure) domain could be interpreted as the probability that system conditions exceed an irrevocable tipping point. But the probability in this subject covers the different areas that different approaches and indicators can evaluate. In this context, reliability engineering is used the reliability (uptime) and recoverability (downtime) indicators (or performance indicators) as the most useful probabilistic tools for performance measurement. Therefore, our research penalty area is the resilience concept in combination with reliability and recoverability. It must be said that the resilience evaluators must be considering a diversity of knowledge sources. In this thesis, the literature review points to several important implications for understanding and applying resilience in the engineering area and The Arctic condition. Indeed, we try to understand the application and interaction of different performance-based resilience concepts. In this way, a collection of the most popular performance-based resilience analysis methods with an engineering perspective is added as a state-of-the-art review. The performance indicators studies reveal that operational conditions significantly affect the components, industry activities, and infrastructures performance in various ways. These influential factors (or heterogeneity) can broadly be studied into two groups: observable and unobservable risk factors in probability analysis of system performance. The covariate-based models (regression), such as proportional hazard models (PHM), and their extent are the most popular methods for quantifying observable and unobservable risk factors. The report is organized as follows: After a brief introduction of resilience, chapters 2,3 priorly ... Master Thesis Arctic University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftunivtroemsoe
language English
topic Teknologi
Safety
TEK-3901
spellingShingle Teknologi
Safety
TEK-3901
Jheeta, Manjit Singh
Resilience, Reliability, and Recoverability (3Rs)
topic_facet Teknologi
Safety
TEK-3901
description Recent natural and human-made disasters, mortgage derivatives crises, and the need for stable systems in different areas have renewed interest in the concept of resilience, especially as it relates to complex industrial systems with mechanical failures. This concept in the engineering systems (infrastructure) domain could be interpreted as the probability that system conditions exceed an irrevocable tipping point. But the probability in this subject covers the different areas that different approaches and indicators can evaluate. In this context, reliability engineering is used the reliability (uptime) and recoverability (downtime) indicators (or performance indicators) as the most useful probabilistic tools for performance measurement. Therefore, our research penalty area is the resilience concept in combination with reliability and recoverability. It must be said that the resilience evaluators must be considering a diversity of knowledge sources. In this thesis, the literature review points to several important implications for understanding and applying resilience in the engineering area and The Arctic condition. Indeed, we try to understand the application and interaction of different performance-based resilience concepts. In this way, a collection of the most popular performance-based resilience analysis methods with an engineering perspective is added as a state-of-the-art review. The performance indicators studies reveal that operational conditions significantly affect the components, industry activities, and infrastructures performance in various ways. These influential factors (or heterogeneity) can broadly be studied into two groups: observable and unobservable risk factors in probability analysis of system performance. The covariate-based models (regression), such as proportional hazard models (PHM), and their extent are the most popular methods for quantifying observable and unobservable risk factors. The report is organized as follows: After a brief introduction of resilience, chapters 2,3 priorly ...
format Master Thesis
author Jheeta, Manjit Singh
author_facet Jheeta, Manjit Singh
author_sort Jheeta, Manjit Singh
title Resilience, Reliability, and Recoverability (3Rs)
title_short Resilience, Reliability, and Recoverability (3Rs)
title_full Resilience, Reliability, and Recoverability (3Rs)
title_fullStr Resilience, Reliability, and Recoverability (3Rs)
title_full_unstemmed Resilience, Reliability, and Recoverability (3Rs)
title_sort resilience, reliability, and recoverability (3rs)
publisher UiT The Arctic University of Norway
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/10037/25358
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation https://hdl.handle.net/10037/25358
op_rights Copyright 2022 The Author(s)
_version_ 1766343181774880768