Gonads or body? Differences in gonadal and somatic photoperiodic growth response in two vole species

To optimally time reproduction, seasonal mammals use a photoperiodic neuroendocrine system (PNES) that measures photoperiod and subsequently drives reproduction. To adapt to late spring arrival at northern latitudes, a lower photoperiodic sensitivity and therefore a higher critical photoperiod for r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Experimental Biology
Main Authors: van Rosmalen, Laura, van Dalum, Mattis Jayme, Hazlerigg, David, Hut, Roelof A.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: The Company of Biologists 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10037/19972
https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.230987
_version_ 1829307323343962112
author van Rosmalen, Laura
van Dalum, Mattis Jayme
Hazlerigg, David
Hut, Roelof A.
author_facet van Rosmalen, Laura
van Dalum, Mattis Jayme
Hazlerigg, David
Hut, Roelof A.
author_sort van Rosmalen, Laura
collection University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive
container_title Journal of Experimental Biology
description To optimally time reproduction, seasonal mammals use a photoperiodic neuroendocrine system (PNES) that measures photoperiod and subsequently drives reproduction. To adapt to late spring arrival at northern latitudes, a lower photoperiodic sensitivity and therefore a higher critical photoperiod for reproductive onset is necessary in northern species to arrest reproductive development until spring onset. Temperature–photoperiod relationships, and hence food availability–photoperiod relationships, are highly latitude dependent. Therefore, we predict PNES sensitivity characteristics to be latitude dependent. Here, we investigated photoperiodic responses at different times during development in northern (tundra or root vole, Microtus oeconomus ) and southern vole species (common vole, Microtus arvalis ) exposed to constant short (SP) or long photoperiod (LP). Although the tundra vole grows faster under LP, no photoperiodic effect on somatic growth is observed in the common vole. In contrast, gonadal growth is more sensitive to photoperiod in the common vole, suggesting that photoperiodic responses in somatic and gonadal growth can be plastic, and might be regulated through different mechanisms. In both species, thyroid-stimulating hormone β-subunit ( Tshβ ) and iodothyronine deiodinase 2 ( Dio2 ) expression is highly increased under LP, whereas Tshr and Dio3 decrease under LP. High Tshr levels in voles raised under SP may lead to increased sensitivity to increasing photoperiods later in life. The higher photoperiodic-induced Tshr response in tundra voles suggests that the northern vole species might be more sensitive to thyroid-stimulating hormone when raised under SP. In conclusion, species differences in developmental programming of the PNES, which is dependent on photoperiod early in development, may form different breeding strategies as part of latitudinal adaptation.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Common vole
Microtus arvalis
Tundra
genre_facet Common vole
Microtus arvalis
Tundra
id ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/19972
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftunivtroemsoe
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.230987
op_relation van Dalum, M.J. (2022). Evolution of seasonal adaptations in voles - a physiological and genetic approach. (Doctoral thesis). https://hdl.handle.net/10037/24919 .
Journal of Experimental Biology
van Rosmalen, van Dalum, Hazlerigg, Hut. Gonads or body? Differences in gonadal and somatic photoperiodic growth response in two vole species. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2020;223
FRIDAID 1848179
doi:10.1242/jeb.230987
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/19972
op_rights openAccess
© 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd |
publishDate 2020
publisher The Company of Biologists
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/19972 2025-04-13T14:17:33+00:00 Gonads or body? Differences in gonadal and somatic photoperiodic growth response in two vole species van Rosmalen, Laura van Dalum, Mattis Jayme Hazlerigg, David Hut, Roelof A. 2020-10-21 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/19972 https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.230987 eng eng The Company of Biologists van Dalum, M.J. (2022). Evolution of seasonal adaptations in voles - a physiological and genetic approach. (Doctoral thesis). https://hdl.handle.net/10037/24919 . Journal of Experimental Biology van Rosmalen, van Dalum, Hazlerigg, Hut. Gonads or body? Differences in gonadal and somatic photoperiodic growth response in two vole species. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2020;223 FRIDAID 1848179 doi:10.1242/jeb.230987 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/19972 openAccess © 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | VDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Zoology and botany: 480 VDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480 Journal article Tidsskriftartikkel Peer reviewed acceptedVersion 2020 ftunivtroemsoe https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.230987 2025-03-14T05:17:56Z To optimally time reproduction, seasonal mammals use a photoperiodic neuroendocrine system (PNES) that measures photoperiod and subsequently drives reproduction. To adapt to late spring arrival at northern latitudes, a lower photoperiodic sensitivity and therefore a higher critical photoperiod for reproductive onset is necessary in northern species to arrest reproductive development until spring onset. Temperature–photoperiod relationships, and hence food availability–photoperiod relationships, are highly latitude dependent. Therefore, we predict PNES sensitivity characteristics to be latitude dependent. Here, we investigated photoperiodic responses at different times during development in northern (tundra or root vole, Microtus oeconomus ) and southern vole species (common vole, Microtus arvalis ) exposed to constant short (SP) or long photoperiod (LP). Although the tundra vole grows faster under LP, no photoperiodic effect on somatic growth is observed in the common vole. In contrast, gonadal growth is more sensitive to photoperiod in the common vole, suggesting that photoperiodic responses in somatic and gonadal growth can be plastic, and might be regulated through different mechanisms. In both species, thyroid-stimulating hormone β-subunit ( Tshβ ) and iodothyronine deiodinase 2 ( Dio2 ) expression is highly increased under LP, whereas Tshr and Dio3 decrease under LP. High Tshr levels in voles raised under SP may lead to increased sensitivity to increasing photoperiods later in life. The higher photoperiodic-induced Tshr response in tundra voles suggests that the northern vole species might be more sensitive to thyroid-stimulating hormone when raised under SP. In conclusion, species differences in developmental programming of the PNES, which is dependent on photoperiod early in development, may form different breeding strategies as part of latitudinal adaptation. Article in Journal/Newspaper Common vole Microtus arvalis Tundra University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive Journal of Experimental Biology
spellingShingle VDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Zoology and botany: 480
VDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480
van Rosmalen, Laura
van Dalum, Mattis Jayme
Hazlerigg, David
Hut, Roelof A.
Gonads or body? Differences in gonadal and somatic photoperiodic growth response in two vole species
title Gonads or body? Differences in gonadal and somatic photoperiodic growth response in two vole species
title_full Gonads or body? Differences in gonadal and somatic photoperiodic growth response in two vole species
title_fullStr Gonads or body? Differences in gonadal and somatic photoperiodic growth response in two vole species
title_full_unstemmed Gonads or body? Differences in gonadal and somatic photoperiodic growth response in two vole species
title_short Gonads or body? Differences in gonadal and somatic photoperiodic growth response in two vole species
title_sort gonads or body? differences in gonadal and somatic photoperiodic growth response in two vole species
topic VDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Zoology and botany: 480
VDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480
topic_facet VDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Zoology and botany: 480
VDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480
url https://hdl.handle.net/10037/19972
https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.230987