The association between anthropometric measures of adiposity and the progression of carotid atherosclerosis

• Published in: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
• Main Authors: Imahori, Yume, Mathiesen, Ellisiv B., Morgan, Katy E., Frost, Chris, Hughes, Alun D., Hopstock, Laila Arnesdatter, Johnsen, Stein Harald, Emaus, Nina, Leon, David Adrew
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2020
• Subjects: VDP::Medical disciplines: 700; VDP::Medisinske Fag: 700; Tromsø
• Online Access: https://hdl.handle.net/10037/18511; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01417-0

Background - Few reports are available on the contribution of general and abdominal obesity to the progression of carotid atherosclerosis in late adulthood. This study investigated the impact of four simple anthropometric measures of general and abdominal obesity on the progression of carotid atherosclerosis and the extent to which the association between adiposity and the progression of plaque burden is mediated by cardiometabolic markers. Methods - Four thousand three hundred forty-five adults (median age 60) from the population-based Tromsø Study were followed over 7 years from the first carotid ultrasound screening to the next. The progression of carotid atherosclerosis was measured in three ways: incidence of plaques in previously plaque-free participants; change in the number of plaques; and total plaque area (TPA). We used generalised linear models to investigate the association between each adiposity measure – body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) – and each outcome. Models were adjusted for potential confounders (age, sex, smoking, education, physical activity). The pathways through which any associations observed might operate were investigated by further adjusting for cardiometabolic mediators (systolic blood pressure, cholesterol, and HbA1c). Results - There was little evidence that adiposity was related to the formation of new plaques during follow-up. However, abdominal adiposity was associated with TPA progression. WHtR showed the largest effect size (mean change in TPA per one standard deviation (SD) increase in WHtR of 0.665 mm 2 , 95% confidence interval 0.198, 1.133) while BMI showed the smallest. Effect sizes were substantially reduced after the adjustment for potential mediators. Conclusions - Abdominal obesity indirectly measured with WC seems more strongly associated with the progression of TPA than general obesity. These associations appear to be largely mediated by known cardiometabolic markers.