Icelandic permafrost dynamics since the Last Glacial Maximum – model results and geomorphological implications

Iceland’s periglacial realm is one of the most dynamic on the planet, with active geomorphologicalprocesses and high weathering rates of young bedrock resulting in high sediment yields and ongoingmass movement. Permafrost is discontinuous in Iceland’s highlands and mountains over c. 800 m a.s.l,and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Quaternary Science Reviews
Main Authors: Etzelmüller, Bernd, Patton, Henry, Schomacker, Anders, Czekirda, Justyna, Girod, Luc, Hubbard, Alun Lloyd, Lilleøren, Karianne Staalesen, Westermann, Sebastian
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020
Subjects:
Ice
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10037/17981
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106236
id ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/17981
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/17981 2023-05-15T14:26:46+02:00 Icelandic permafrost dynamics since the Last Glacial Maximum – model results and geomorphological implications Etzelmüller, Bernd Patton, Henry Schomacker, Anders Czekirda, Justyna Girod, Luc Hubbard, Alun Lloyd Lilleøren, Karianne Staalesen Westermann, Sebastian 2020-03-14 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/17981 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106236 eng eng Elsevier Quaternary Science Reviews Norges forskningsråd: 223259 info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/RCN/SFF/223259/Norway/Centre for Arctic Gas Hydrate, Environment and Climate/CAGE/ Etzelmüller, Patton, Schomacker, Czekirda, Girod, Hubbard, Lilleøren, Westermann. Icelandic permafrost dynamics since the Last Glacial Maximum – model results and geomorphological implications. Quaternary Science Reviews. 2020;233:1-15 FRIDAID 1802339 doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106236 0277-3791 1873-457X https://hdl.handle.net/10037/17981 openAccess Copyright 2020 The Author(s) VDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Geosciences: 450 VDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Geofag: 450 Journal article Tidsskriftartikkel Peer reviewed publishedVersion 2020 ftunivtroemsoe https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106236 2021-06-25T17:57:20Z Iceland’s periglacial realm is one of the most dynamic on the planet, with active geomorphologicalprocesses and high weathering rates of young bedrock resulting in high sediment yields and ongoingmass movement. Permafrost is discontinuous in Iceland’s highlands and mountains over c. 800 m a.s.l,and sporadic in palsa mires in the central highlands. During the late Pleistocene and Holocene, Iceland’speriglacial environment varied considerably in time and space, dominated by glacialfluctuations andperiglacial processes. To evaluate the dynamics of permafrost in Iceland since the last deglaciation, weuse the output of a coupled climate/ice sheet model to force a transient permafrost model (CryoGRID 2)from the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) through to the present. Wefind that permafrost was widespreadacross the deglaciated areas of western, northern and eastern Iceland after the LGM, and that up to 20% ofIceland’s terrestrial area was underlain by permafrost throughout the late Pleistocene. This influencedgeomorphological processes and landform generation: the early collapse of the marine-based ice sheettogether with the aggradation of permafrost in these zones initiated the formation of abundant and nowrelict rock glaciers across coastal margins. Permafrost degraded rapidly after the Younger Dryas, with amarked impact on slope stability. Permafrost that formed during the Little Ice Age is again thawingrapidly, and an escalation in slope failure and mass-movement might be currently underway. Our studydemonstrates that large regions of Iceland have been underlain by permafrost for millennia, facilitatinglandform development and influencing the stability of steep slopes. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Ice Ice Sheet Iceland palsa permafrost University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive Quaternary Science Reviews 233 106236
institution Open Polar
collection University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftunivtroemsoe
language English
topic VDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Geosciences: 450
VDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Geofag: 450
spellingShingle VDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Geosciences: 450
VDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Geofag: 450
Etzelmüller, Bernd
Patton, Henry
Schomacker, Anders
Czekirda, Justyna
Girod, Luc
Hubbard, Alun Lloyd
Lilleøren, Karianne Staalesen
Westermann, Sebastian
Icelandic permafrost dynamics since the Last Glacial Maximum – model results and geomorphological implications
topic_facet VDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Geosciences: 450
VDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Geofag: 450
description Iceland’s periglacial realm is one of the most dynamic on the planet, with active geomorphologicalprocesses and high weathering rates of young bedrock resulting in high sediment yields and ongoingmass movement. Permafrost is discontinuous in Iceland’s highlands and mountains over c. 800 m a.s.l,and sporadic in palsa mires in the central highlands. During the late Pleistocene and Holocene, Iceland’speriglacial environment varied considerably in time and space, dominated by glacialfluctuations andperiglacial processes. To evaluate the dynamics of permafrost in Iceland since the last deglaciation, weuse the output of a coupled climate/ice sheet model to force a transient permafrost model (CryoGRID 2)from the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) through to the present. Wefind that permafrost was widespreadacross the deglaciated areas of western, northern and eastern Iceland after the LGM, and that up to 20% ofIceland’s terrestrial area was underlain by permafrost throughout the late Pleistocene. This influencedgeomorphological processes and landform generation: the early collapse of the marine-based ice sheettogether with the aggradation of permafrost in these zones initiated the formation of abundant and nowrelict rock glaciers across coastal margins. Permafrost degraded rapidly after the Younger Dryas, with amarked impact on slope stability. Permafrost that formed during the Little Ice Age is again thawingrapidly, and an escalation in slope failure and mass-movement might be currently underway. Our studydemonstrates that large regions of Iceland have been underlain by permafrost for millennia, facilitatinglandform development and influencing the stability of steep slopes.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Etzelmüller, Bernd
Patton, Henry
Schomacker, Anders
Czekirda, Justyna
Girod, Luc
Hubbard, Alun Lloyd
Lilleøren, Karianne Staalesen
Westermann, Sebastian
author_facet Etzelmüller, Bernd
Patton, Henry
Schomacker, Anders
Czekirda, Justyna
Girod, Luc
Hubbard, Alun Lloyd
Lilleøren, Karianne Staalesen
Westermann, Sebastian
author_sort Etzelmüller, Bernd
title Icelandic permafrost dynamics since the Last Glacial Maximum – model results and geomorphological implications
title_short Icelandic permafrost dynamics since the Last Glacial Maximum – model results and geomorphological implications
title_full Icelandic permafrost dynamics since the Last Glacial Maximum – model results and geomorphological implications
title_fullStr Icelandic permafrost dynamics since the Last Glacial Maximum – model results and geomorphological implications
title_full_unstemmed Icelandic permafrost dynamics since the Last Glacial Maximum – model results and geomorphological implications
title_sort icelandic permafrost dynamics since the last glacial maximum – model results and geomorphological implications
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2020
url https://hdl.handle.net/10037/17981
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106236
genre Arctic
Ice
Ice Sheet
Iceland
palsa
permafrost
genre_facet Arctic
Ice
Ice Sheet
Iceland
palsa
permafrost
op_relation Quaternary Science Reviews
Norges forskningsråd: 223259
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/RCN/SFF/223259/Norway/Centre for Arctic Gas Hydrate, Environment and Climate/CAGE/
Etzelmüller, Patton, Schomacker, Czekirda, Girod, Hubbard, Lilleøren, Westermann. Icelandic permafrost dynamics since the Last Glacial Maximum – model results and geomorphological implications. Quaternary Science Reviews. 2020;233:1-15
FRIDAID 1802339
doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106236
0277-3791
1873-457X
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/17981
op_rights openAccess
Copyright 2020 The Author(s)
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106236
container_title Quaternary Science Reviews
container_volume 233
container_start_page 106236
_version_ 1766300192585285632