Global diversity and geography of planktonic marine fungi

Growing interest in understanding the relevance of marine fungi to food webs, biogeochemical cycling, and biological patterns necessitates establishing a context for interpreting future findings. To help establish this context, we summarize the diversity of cultured and observed marine planktonic fu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Botanica Marina
Main Author: Hassett, Brandon
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10037/17258
https://doi.org/10.1515/bot-2018-0113
id ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/17258
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/17258 2023-05-15T18:18:40+02:00 Global diversity and geography of planktonic marine fungi Hassett, Brandon 2019-07-24 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/17258 https://doi.org/10.1515/bot-2018-0113 eng eng De Gruyter Botanica Marina Hassett BT. Global diversity and geography of planktonic marine fungi. Botanica Marina. 2019 FRIDAID 1718399 https://doi.org/10.1515/bot-2018-0113 0006-8055 1437-4323 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/17258 openAccess © 2019 The Authors Journal article Tidsskriftartikkel Peer reviewed publishedVersion 2019 ftunivtroemsoe https://doi.org/10.1515/bot-2018-0113 2021-06-25T17:56:47Z Growing interest in understanding the relevance of marine fungi to food webs, biogeochemical cycling, and biological patterns necessitates establishing a context for interpreting future findings. To help establish this context, we summarize the diversity of cultured and observed marine planktonic fungi from across the world. While exploring this diversity, we discovered that only half of the known marine fungal species have a publicly available DNA locus, which we hypothesize will likely hinder accurate high-throughput sequencing classification in the future, as it does currently. Still, we reprocessed >600 high-throughput datasets and analyzed 4.9 × 10 9 sequences (4. 8 × 10 9 shotgun metagenomic reads and 1.0 × 108 amplicon sequences) and found that every fungal phylum is represented in the global marine planktonic mycobiome; however, this mycobiome is generally predominated by three phyla: the Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Chytridiomycota. We hypothesize that these three clades are the most abundant due to a combination of evolutionary histories, as well as physical processes that aid in their dispersal. We found that environments with atypical salinity regimes (>5 standard deviations from the global mean: Red Sea, Baltic Sea, sea ice) hosted higher proportions of the Chytridiomycota, relative to open oceans that are dominated by Dikarya. The Baltic Sea and Mediterranean Sea had the highest fungal richness of all areas explored. An analysis of similarity identified significant differences between oceanographic regions. There were no latitudinal gradients of marine fungal richness and diversity observed. As more high-throughput sequencing data become available, expanding the collection of reference loci and genomes will be essential to understanding the ecology of marine fungi. Article in Journal/Newspaper Sea ice University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive Botanica Marina 63 2 121 139
institution Open Polar
collection University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive
op_collection_id ftunivtroemsoe
language English
description Growing interest in understanding the relevance of marine fungi to food webs, biogeochemical cycling, and biological patterns necessitates establishing a context for interpreting future findings. To help establish this context, we summarize the diversity of cultured and observed marine planktonic fungi from across the world. While exploring this diversity, we discovered that only half of the known marine fungal species have a publicly available DNA locus, which we hypothesize will likely hinder accurate high-throughput sequencing classification in the future, as it does currently. Still, we reprocessed >600 high-throughput datasets and analyzed 4.9 × 10 9 sequences (4. 8 × 10 9 shotgun metagenomic reads and 1.0 × 108 amplicon sequences) and found that every fungal phylum is represented in the global marine planktonic mycobiome; however, this mycobiome is generally predominated by three phyla: the Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Chytridiomycota. We hypothesize that these three clades are the most abundant due to a combination of evolutionary histories, as well as physical processes that aid in their dispersal. We found that environments with atypical salinity regimes (>5 standard deviations from the global mean: Red Sea, Baltic Sea, sea ice) hosted higher proportions of the Chytridiomycota, relative to open oceans that are dominated by Dikarya. The Baltic Sea and Mediterranean Sea had the highest fungal richness of all areas explored. An analysis of similarity identified significant differences between oceanographic regions. There were no latitudinal gradients of marine fungal richness and diversity observed. As more high-throughput sequencing data become available, expanding the collection of reference loci and genomes will be essential to understanding the ecology of marine fungi.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Hassett, Brandon
spellingShingle Hassett, Brandon
Global diversity and geography of planktonic marine fungi
author_facet Hassett, Brandon
author_sort Hassett, Brandon
title Global diversity and geography of planktonic marine fungi
title_short Global diversity and geography of planktonic marine fungi
title_full Global diversity and geography of planktonic marine fungi
title_fullStr Global diversity and geography of planktonic marine fungi
title_full_unstemmed Global diversity and geography of planktonic marine fungi
title_sort global diversity and geography of planktonic marine fungi
publisher De Gruyter
publishDate 2019
url https://hdl.handle.net/10037/17258
https://doi.org/10.1515/bot-2018-0113
genre Sea ice
genre_facet Sea ice
op_relation Botanica Marina
Hassett BT. Global diversity and geography of planktonic marine fungi. Botanica Marina. 2019
FRIDAID 1718399
https://doi.org/10.1515/bot-2018-0113
0006-8055
1437-4323
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/17258
op_rights openAccess
© 2019 The Authors
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1515/bot-2018-0113
container_title Botanica Marina
container_volume 63
container_issue 2
container_start_page 121
op_container_end_page 139
_version_ 1766195314155323392