Effects of Human Disturbance on Foraging Behavior of Dunlins Calidris alpina

Studies on effects of human activity on the foraging behavior of dunlins Calidris alpina were conducted using methods of focal-animal sampling and human-disturbance experiment at the beaches of Yanpen and Yuecheng, Yueqing bay in Zhejiang Province from November 2003 to March 2004. Results of focal-a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yue-wei Yang, Gui-rong Xia, Ping Ding, Yu-zhao Chen
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:Chinese
English
Published: Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1807/9343
http://www.bioline.org.br/abstract?id=zr05039
id ftunivtoronto:oai:localhost:1807/9343
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtoronto:oai:localhost:1807/9343 2023-05-15T15:48:15+02:00 Effects of Human Disturbance on Foraging Behavior of Dunlins Calidris alpina Yue-wei Yang Gui-rong Xia Ping Ding Yu-zhao Chen 2005-12-31 200513 bytes application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1807/9343 http://www.bioline.org.br/abstract?id=zr05039 cn en_US chi eng Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences http://www.kiz.ac.cn; http://www.bioline.org.br/zr http://www.bioline.org.br/abstract?id=zr05039 Zoological Research (ISSN: 0254-5853) Vol 26 Num 2 http://hdl.handle.net/1807/9343 Copyright 2005 Kunming Institute of Zoology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences Human disturbance Dunlin Foraging behavior Minimal approach distance Article 2005 ftunivtoronto 2020-06-17T11:09:45Z Studies on effects of human activity on the foraging behavior of dunlins Calidris alpina were conducted using methods of focal-animal sampling and human-disturbance experiment at the beaches of Yanpen and Yuecheng, Yueqing bay in Zhejiang Province from November 2003 to March 2004. Results of focal-animal sampling showed that 96.6% of dunlins responded to human disturbances at a distance of 35 m or less by either running or flying. Dunlins spent 90% (94% in Yanpen with less people while only 85% in Yuecheng with more people) of the time foraging and 10% avoiding human disturbance generally. Number of persons and type of human activities had significant effects on foraging time, respectively. The distance and frequency of dunlin moved, and the response behaviors of dunlin to human approaching were significantly sensitive to the number of persons, the type of human activities and the distance from humans. The results of human-disturbance experiment indicated that the distances of dunlins responding to human were 3-30 m. The minimal approach distance to dunlins was significantly lager at one disturber than that at two disturbers, but no significant difference between two types of human activities, walking and running. This study tested the hypothesis that the human activities in shorebird foraging areas adversely affect the foraging behavior of dunlins. Article in Journal/Newspaper Calidris alpina University of Toronto: Research Repository T-Space The Beaches ENVELOPE(-56.832,-56.832,49.583,49.583)
institution Open Polar
collection University of Toronto: Research Repository T-Space
op_collection_id ftunivtoronto
language Chinese
English
topic Human disturbance
Dunlin
Foraging behavior
Minimal approach distance
spellingShingle Human disturbance
Dunlin
Foraging behavior
Minimal approach distance
Yue-wei Yang
Gui-rong Xia
Ping Ding
Yu-zhao Chen
Effects of Human Disturbance on Foraging Behavior of Dunlins Calidris alpina
topic_facet Human disturbance
Dunlin
Foraging behavior
Minimal approach distance
description Studies on effects of human activity on the foraging behavior of dunlins Calidris alpina were conducted using methods of focal-animal sampling and human-disturbance experiment at the beaches of Yanpen and Yuecheng, Yueqing bay in Zhejiang Province from November 2003 to March 2004. Results of focal-animal sampling showed that 96.6% of dunlins responded to human disturbances at a distance of 35 m or less by either running or flying. Dunlins spent 90% (94% in Yanpen with less people while only 85% in Yuecheng with more people) of the time foraging and 10% avoiding human disturbance generally. Number of persons and type of human activities had significant effects on foraging time, respectively. The distance and frequency of dunlin moved, and the response behaviors of dunlin to human approaching were significantly sensitive to the number of persons, the type of human activities and the distance from humans. The results of human-disturbance experiment indicated that the distances of dunlins responding to human were 3-30 m. The minimal approach distance to dunlins was significantly lager at one disturber than that at two disturbers, but no significant difference between two types of human activities, walking and running. This study tested the hypothesis that the human activities in shorebird foraging areas adversely affect the foraging behavior of dunlins.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Yue-wei Yang
Gui-rong Xia
Ping Ding
Yu-zhao Chen
author_facet Yue-wei Yang
Gui-rong Xia
Ping Ding
Yu-zhao Chen
author_sort Yue-wei Yang
title Effects of Human Disturbance on Foraging Behavior of Dunlins Calidris alpina
title_short Effects of Human Disturbance on Foraging Behavior of Dunlins Calidris alpina
title_full Effects of Human Disturbance on Foraging Behavior of Dunlins Calidris alpina
title_fullStr Effects of Human Disturbance on Foraging Behavior of Dunlins Calidris alpina
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Human Disturbance on Foraging Behavior of Dunlins Calidris alpina
title_sort effects of human disturbance on foraging behavior of dunlins calidris alpina
publisher Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
publishDate 2005
url http://hdl.handle.net/1807/9343
http://www.bioline.org.br/abstract?id=zr05039
long_lat ENVELOPE(-56.832,-56.832,49.583,49.583)
geographic The Beaches
geographic_facet The Beaches
genre Calidris alpina
genre_facet Calidris alpina
op_relation http://www.kiz.ac.cn; http://www.bioline.org.br/zr
http://www.bioline.org.br/abstract?id=zr05039
Zoological Research (ISSN: 0254-5853) Vol 26 Num 2
http://hdl.handle.net/1807/9343
op_rights Copyright 2005 Kunming Institute of Zoology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences
_version_ 1766383241558753280