Financial costs of conducting science in the Arctic: examples from seabird research

Research in remote locations is more expensive than similar activities at sites with easier access, but these costs have rarely been compared. Using examples from seabird research, we show that conducting research in the Arctic is typically eight times more expensive than pursuing similar studies at...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mallory, Mark L., Gilchrist, H Grant, Janssen, Michael, Major, Heather L, Merkel, Flemming, Provencher, Jennifer F., Strøm, Hallvard
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: NRC Research Press (a division of Canadian Science Publishing) 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1807/90676
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/AS-2017-0019
id ftunivtoronto:oai:localhost:1807/90676
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtoronto:oai:localhost:1807/90676 2023-05-15T14:39:35+02:00 Financial costs of conducting science in the Arctic: examples from seabird research Mallory, Mark L. Gilchrist, H Grant Janssen, Michael Major, Heather L Merkel, Flemming Provencher, Jennifer F. Strøm, Hallvard 2018-05-30 http://hdl.handle.net/1807/90676 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/AS-2017-0019 unknown NRC Research Press (a division of Canadian Science Publishing) N http://hdl.handle.net/1807/90676 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/AS-2017-0019 Article 2018 ftunivtoronto 2020-06-17T12:20:19Z Research in remote locations is more expensive than similar activities at sites with easier access, but these costs have rarely been compared. Using examples from seabird research, we show that conducting research in the Arctic is typically eight times more expensive than pursuing similar studies at a southern location. The differences in costs are related principally to the much higher expenses of travel and shipping (typically 4-10X higher for Arctic work), as well as the good practice of meaningful engagement with northern communities (4-25% of project costs). Although there is some variation in costs among Arctic countries, we hope that the consistent pattern of relatively higher Arctic costs allows policy-makers and funding agencies to better plan for research support, especially for this region that is experiencing rapid environmental change. The accepted manuscript in pdf format is listed with the files at the bottom of this page. The presentation of the authors' names and (or) special characters in the title of the manuscript may differ slightly between what is listed on this page and what is listed in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript; that in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript is what was submitted by the author. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic University of Toronto: Research Repository T-Space Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection University of Toronto: Research Repository T-Space
op_collection_id ftunivtoronto
language unknown
description Research in remote locations is more expensive than similar activities at sites with easier access, but these costs have rarely been compared. Using examples from seabird research, we show that conducting research in the Arctic is typically eight times more expensive than pursuing similar studies at a southern location. The differences in costs are related principally to the much higher expenses of travel and shipping (typically 4-10X higher for Arctic work), as well as the good practice of meaningful engagement with northern communities (4-25% of project costs). Although there is some variation in costs among Arctic countries, we hope that the consistent pattern of relatively higher Arctic costs allows policy-makers and funding agencies to better plan for research support, especially for this region that is experiencing rapid environmental change. The accepted manuscript in pdf format is listed with the files at the bottom of this page. The presentation of the authors' names and (or) special characters in the title of the manuscript may differ slightly between what is listed on this page and what is listed in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript; that in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript is what was submitted by the author.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Mallory, Mark L.
Gilchrist, H Grant
Janssen, Michael
Major, Heather L
Merkel, Flemming
Provencher, Jennifer F.
Strøm, Hallvard
spellingShingle Mallory, Mark L.
Gilchrist, H Grant
Janssen, Michael
Major, Heather L
Merkel, Flemming
Provencher, Jennifer F.
Strøm, Hallvard
Financial costs of conducting science in the Arctic: examples from seabird research
author_facet Mallory, Mark L.
Gilchrist, H Grant
Janssen, Michael
Major, Heather L
Merkel, Flemming
Provencher, Jennifer F.
Strøm, Hallvard
author_sort Mallory, Mark L.
title Financial costs of conducting science in the Arctic: examples from seabird research
title_short Financial costs of conducting science in the Arctic: examples from seabird research
title_full Financial costs of conducting science in the Arctic: examples from seabird research
title_fullStr Financial costs of conducting science in the Arctic: examples from seabird research
title_full_unstemmed Financial costs of conducting science in the Arctic: examples from seabird research
title_sort financial costs of conducting science in the arctic: examples from seabird research
publisher NRC Research Press (a division of Canadian Science Publishing)
publishDate 2018
url http://hdl.handle.net/1807/90676
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/AS-2017-0019
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation N
http://hdl.handle.net/1807/90676
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/AS-2017-0019
_version_ 1766311559644053504