Reappraisal, Deaccessioning, and Accountability: When ‘Doing the Best We Can’ is not Good Enough

The subjects of reappraisal, deaccessioning, and accountability are rather consentaneous issues in the realm of archival study. Using the 2008 Paper Caper from Newfoundland as a case study, this article will discuss some of the issues surrounding reappraisal, deaccessioning, and accountability. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wall, Darren
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1807/80168
id ftunivtoronto:oai:localhost:1807/80168
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtoronto:oai:localhost:1807/80168 2023-05-15T17:21:47+02:00 Reappraisal, Deaccessioning, and Accountability: When ‘Doing the Best We Can’ is not Good Enough Wall, Darren 2010-03 http://hdl.handle.net/1807/80168 en_ca eng Wall, D. (2010). Reappraisal, Deaccessioning, and Accountability: When ‘Doing the Best We Can’ is not Good Enough. Faculty of Information Quarterly, 2(1), 1-12. 1925-9107 http://hdl.handle.net/1807/80168 Attribution 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ CC-BY Article 2010 ftunivtoronto 2020-06-17T12:07:42Z The subjects of reappraisal, deaccessioning, and accountability are rather consentaneous issues in the realm of archival study. Using the 2008 Paper Caper from Newfoundland as a case study, this article will discuss some of the issues surrounding reappraisal, deaccessioning, and accountability. The case study is used as a window into the way the above mentioned topics are considered within the archival community. Alternative methods of thought are offered in relation to these matters in an attempt to spur discussion as a means of dealing with reappraisal, deaccessioning, and accountability, with the goal of avoiding a reoccurrence of an incident like that of the Paper Caper. Article in Journal/Newspaper Newfoundland University of Toronto: Research Repository T-Space
institution Open Polar
collection University of Toronto: Research Repository T-Space
op_collection_id ftunivtoronto
language English
description The subjects of reappraisal, deaccessioning, and accountability are rather consentaneous issues in the realm of archival study. Using the 2008 Paper Caper from Newfoundland as a case study, this article will discuss some of the issues surrounding reappraisal, deaccessioning, and accountability. The case study is used as a window into the way the above mentioned topics are considered within the archival community. Alternative methods of thought are offered in relation to these matters in an attempt to spur discussion as a means of dealing with reappraisal, deaccessioning, and accountability, with the goal of avoiding a reoccurrence of an incident like that of the Paper Caper.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Wall, Darren
spellingShingle Wall, Darren
Reappraisal, Deaccessioning, and Accountability: When ‘Doing the Best We Can’ is not Good Enough
author_facet Wall, Darren
author_sort Wall, Darren
title Reappraisal, Deaccessioning, and Accountability: When ‘Doing the Best We Can’ is not Good Enough
title_short Reappraisal, Deaccessioning, and Accountability: When ‘Doing the Best We Can’ is not Good Enough
title_full Reappraisal, Deaccessioning, and Accountability: When ‘Doing the Best We Can’ is not Good Enough
title_fullStr Reappraisal, Deaccessioning, and Accountability: When ‘Doing the Best We Can’ is not Good Enough
title_full_unstemmed Reappraisal, Deaccessioning, and Accountability: When ‘Doing the Best We Can’ is not Good Enough
title_sort reappraisal, deaccessioning, and accountability: when ‘doing the best we can’ is not good enough
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/1807/80168
genre Newfoundland
genre_facet Newfoundland
op_relation Wall, D. (2010). Reappraisal, Deaccessioning, and Accountability: When ‘Doing the Best We Can’ is not Good Enough. Faculty of Information Quarterly, 2(1), 1-12.
1925-9107
http://hdl.handle.net/1807/80168
op_rights Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
_version_ 1766107453488889856