Crude federalism, oil politics and the evolution of intergovernmental relations in post-Soviet Russia

grantor: University of Toronto This dissertation explores the complicated interplay between the institutions of the Russian federal system, the policy making process and the dilemmas of legislative reform in the oil sector. Part one examines the problematic evolution of the 1995 federal Law on Produ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wilson, Gary N.
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2000
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1807/14079
http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp03/NQ49982.pdf
id ftunivtoronto:oai:localhost:1807/14079
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtoronto:oai:localhost:1807/14079 2023-05-15T17:03:00+02:00 Crude federalism, oil politics and the evolution of intergovernmental relations in post-Soviet Russia Wilson, Gary N. 2000 19582442 bytes application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1807/14079 http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp03/NQ49982.pdf en en_US eng http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp03/NQ49982.pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1807/14079 Thesis 2000 ftunivtoronto 2020-06-17T11:12:05Z grantor: University of Toronto This dissertation explores the complicated interplay between the institutions of the Russian federal system, the policy making process and the dilemmas of legislative reform in the oil sector. Part one examines the problematic evolution of the 1995 federal Law on Production Sharing Agreements, a critical element in the reformist agenda. Part two looks at the legislative responses of Tatarstan and Khanty Mansiisk, two resource producing regions, to the production sharing issue and the broader questions of reform in the resource sector. In spite of the apparent benefits that production sharing holds for the crisis-ridden Russian economy, the passage of production sharing legislation has been fraught with problems and delays. Why has this happened? I argue that the operationalization of a production sharing regime has been impeded by a series of institutionally-based cleavages and other disfunctional elements within the Russian federal system. First, jurisdictional overlap and the lack of a mutually acceptable and structured system for resolving disputes have undermined intergovernmental and interregional cooperation in the resource sector. Second, asymmetries between the constituent members of the federation, coupled with the absence of an institutional framework for managing interregional relations, have disrupted the policy making process at the federal level and complicated the process of political and economic reform in the some of the key resource-producing regions. Third, the dominant position of the executive branch at both the federal and regional levels has hampered the legislative process by aggravating the long-standing interbranch conflict. The study draws on the vast theoretical and empirical resources available to students of comparative federalism and comparative politics to explain the structures and processes that characterize the Russian federal model in the post-Soviet period. In doing so, it enhances our understanding of the policy making process in this transitional state. The research also makes a significant contribution to the literature on politics and government in federal states by positioning the Russian Federation within a broader comparative context and introducing a number of concepts and ideas that are unique to the Russian federal system. Ph.D. Thesis khanty University of Toronto: Research Repository T-Space
institution Open Polar
collection University of Toronto: Research Repository T-Space
op_collection_id ftunivtoronto
language English
description grantor: University of Toronto This dissertation explores the complicated interplay between the institutions of the Russian federal system, the policy making process and the dilemmas of legislative reform in the oil sector. Part one examines the problematic evolution of the 1995 federal Law on Production Sharing Agreements, a critical element in the reformist agenda. Part two looks at the legislative responses of Tatarstan and Khanty Mansiisk, two resource producing regions, to the production sharing issue and the broader questions of reform in the resource sector. In spite of the apparent benefits that production sharing holds for the crisis-ridden Russian economy, the passage of production sharing legislation has been fraught with problems and delays. Why has this happened? I argue that the operationalization of a production sharing regime has been impeded by a series of institutionally-based cleavages and other disfunctional elements within the Russian federal system. First, jurisdictional overlap and the lack of a mutually acceptable and structured system for resolving disputes have undermined intergovernmental and interregional cooperation in the resource sector. Second, asymmetries between the constituent members of the federation, coupled with the absence of an institutional framework for managing interregional relations, have disrupted the policy making process at the federal level and complicated the process of political and economic reform in the some of the key resource-producing regions. Third, the dominant position of the executive branch at both the federal and regional levels has hampered the legislative process by aggravating the long-standing interbranch conflict. The study draws on the vast theoretical and empirical resources available to students of comparative federalism and comparative politics to explain the structures and processes that characterize the Russian federal model in the post-Soviet period. In doing so, it enhances our understanding of the policy making process in this transitional state. The research also makes a significant contribution to the literature on politics and government in federal states by positioning the Russian Federation within a broader comparative context and introducing a number of concepts and ideas that are unique to the Russian federal system. Ph.D.
format Thesis
author Wilson, Gary N.
spellingShingle Wilson, Gary N.
Crude federalism, oil politics and the evolution of intergovernmental relations in post-Soviet Russia
author_facet Wilson, Gary N.
author_sort Wilson, Gary N.
title Crude federalism, oil politics and the evolution of intergovernmental relations in post-Soviet Russia
title_short Crude federalism, oil politics and the evolution of intergovernmental relations in post-Soviet Russia
title_full Crude federalism, oil politics and the evolution of intergovernmental relations in post-Soviet Russia
title_fullStr Crude federalism, oil politics and the evolution of intergovernmental relations in post-Soviet Russia
title_full_unstemmed Crude federalism, oil politics and the evolution of intergovernmental relations in post-Soviet Russia
title_sort crude federalism, oil politics and the evolution of intergovernmental relations in post-soviet russia
publishDate 2000
url http://hdl.handle.net/1807/14079
http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp03/NQ49982.pdf
genre khanty
genre_facet khanty
op_relation http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp03/NQ49982.pdf
http://hdl.handle.net/1807/14079
_version_ 1766056704706871296